SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Agresti A, 2002. Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edn. New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Interscience.
  • Battilani P, Rossi V, Saccardi A, 1999. Development of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni epidemics on peaches. Journal of Plant Pathology81, 16171.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG, 1999. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research8, 13560.
  • Bock CH, Parker PE, Cook AZ, Gottwald TR, 2008. Visual rating and the use of image analysis for assessing different symptoms of citrus canker on grapefruit leaves. Plant Disease92, 53041.
  • Bock CH, Parker PE, Cook AZ, Gottwald TR, 2009a. Automated image analysis of severity of foliar citrus canker. Plant Disease93, 6605.
  • Bock CH, Gottwald TR, Parker PE et al. , 2009b. The Horsfall–Barratt scale and severity estimates of citrus canker. European Journal of Plant Pathology125, 2338.
  • Bock CH, Gottwald TR, Parker PE et al. , 2010a. Some consequences of using the Horsfall–Barratt scale for hypothesis testing. Phytopathology100, 103041.
  • Bock CH, Poole GH, Parker PE, Gottwald TR, 2010b. Plant disease severity estimated visually, by digital photography and image analysis, and by hyperspectral imaging. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences29, 59107.
  • Campbell CL, Madden LV, 1990. Introduction to Plant Disease Epidemiology. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Citadin I, Assmann AP, Mazaro SM, de Gouvêa A, Danner MA, Malagi G, 2008. Diagramatic scale to evaluate the severity of bacteriose in peach trees. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura30, 32730.
  • Crisosto CH, Mitchell FG, Johnson S, 1995. Factors in fresh market stone fruit quality. Postharvest News and Information6, 17N21N.
  • Everitt BS, 1999. Dictionary of Statistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Forbes GA, Jeger MJ, 1987. Factors affecting the estimation of disease intensity in simulated plant structures. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz94, 11320.
  • Forbes GA, Korva JT, 1994. The effect of using a Horsfall–Barratt scale on precision and accuracy of visual estimation of potato late blight severity in the field. Plant Pathology43, 67582.
  • Horsfall JG, Barratt RW, 1945. An improved grading system for measuring plant disease. Phytopathology35, 655.
  • Kendall MG, 1945. The treatment of ties in ranking problems. Biometrika33, 23951.
  • Kendall MG, Babington Smith B, 1939. The problem of m rankings. Annals of Mathematical Statistics10, 27587.
  • Lin L-K, 1989. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics45, 25568.
  • Madden LV, Hughes G, van den Bosch F, 2007. The Study of Plant Disease Epidemics. St Paul, MN, USA: APS Press.
  • Newson R, 2002. Parameters behind “nonparametric” statistics: Kendall’s tau, Somers’ D and median differences. Stata Journal2, 4564.
  • Newton AC, Hackett CA, 1994. Subjective components of mildew assessment on spring barley. European Journal of Plant Pathology100, 395412.
  • Nita M, Ellis MA, Madden LV, 2003. Reliability and accuracy of visual estimation of Phomopsis leaf blight of strawberry. Phytopathology93, 9951005.
  • Nutter FW Jr, Littwiller D, 1993. ALFALFA.PRO– a computerized disease assessment training program for foliar diseases of alfalfa. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Central Alfalfa Improvement Conference, 20–22 June 1993. Lincoln, NE, USA: University of Nebraska, 15.
  • Parker SR, Shaw MW, Royle DJ, 1995. Reliable measurement of disease severity. Aspects of Applied Biology43, 20514.
  • Ritchie DF, 1995. Bacterial spot. In: Ogawa JM, Zehr EI, Bird GW, Ritchie DF, Uriu K, Uyemoto JK, eds. Compendium of Stone Fruit Diseases. St Paul, MN, USA: American Phytopathological Society, 502.
  • Rousson V, Gasser T, Seifert B, 2002. Assessing the intrarater, interrater and test retest reliability of continuous measurements. Statistics in Medicine21, 343146.
  • Sherwood RT, Berg CC, Hoover MR, Zeiders KE, 1983. Illusions in visual assessment of Stagonospora leaf spot of orchardgrass. Phytopathology73, 1737.
  • Shoukri MM, 2004. Measure of Interobserver Agreement. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  • Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GG, 2000. Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System, 2nd edn. Carry, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.
  • Svensson E, 2000. Concordance between ratings using different scales for the same variable. Statistics in Medicine19, 348396.
  • Tomerlin JR, Howell TA, 1988. DISTRAIN: a computer program for training people to estimate disease severity on cereal leaves. Plant Disease72, 4559.
  • Yi Q, Wang PP, He Y, 2008. Reliability analysis for continuous measurements: equivalence test for agreement. Statistics in Medicine27, 281625.
  • Zehr EI, Shepard DP, Bridges Jr WC, 1996. Bacterial spot of peach as influenced by water congestion, leaf wetness duration, and temperature. Plant Disease80, 33941.