For several decades, sedimentologists have had difficulty in obtaining an efficient index of particle form that can be used to specify adequately irregular morphology of sedimentary particles. Mandelbrot has suggested the use of the fractal dimension as a single value estimate of form, in order to characterize morphologically closed loops of an irregular nature. The concept of fractal dimension derives from Richardson's unpublished suggestion that a stable linear relationship appears when the logarithm of the perimeter estimate of an irregular outline is plotted against the logarithm of the unit of measurement (step length). Decreases in step length result in an increase in perimeter by a constant weight (b) for particles whose morphological variations are the same at all measurement scales (self-similarity). The fractal dimension (D) equals 1.0-(b), where b is the slope coefficient of the best-fitting linear regression of the plot. The value of D lies between 1.0 and 2.0, with increasing values of D correlating with increasing irregularity of the outline. In practice, particle outline morphology is not always self-similar, such that two or possibly more fractal elements can occur for many outlines. Two fractal elements reflect the morphological difference between micro-scale edge textural effects (D1) and macro-scale particle structural effects (D2) generated by the presence of crenellate-edge morphology (re-entrants). Fractal calibration on a range of regular/irregular particle outline morphologies, plus examination of carbonate beach, pyroclastic and weathered quartz particles indicates that this type of analysis is best suited for morphological characterization of irregular and crenellate particles. In this respect, fractal analysis appears as the complementary analytical technique to harmonic form analysis in order to achieve an adequate specification of all types of particles on a continuum of irregular to regular morphology.