These authors contributed equally to this work.
Isolation and functional characterization of an influx silicon transporter in two pumpkin cultivars contrasting in silicon accumulation
Article first published online: 21 FEB 2011
© 2011 The Authors. The Plant Journal © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
The Plant Journal
Volume 66, Issue 2, pages 231–240, April 2011
How to Cite
Mitani, N., Yamaji, N., Ago, Y., Iwasaki, K. and Ma, J. F. (2011), Isolation and functional characterization of an influx silicon transporter in two pumpkin cultivars contrasting in silicon accumulation. The Plant Journal, 66: 231–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04483.x
- Issue published online: 18 APR 2011
- Article first published online: 21 FEB 2011
- Accepted manuscript online: 3 JAN 2011 02:18PM EST
- Received 20 July 2010; revised 16 December 2010; accepted 22 December 2010; published online 21 February 2011.
Figure S1. Si uptake by the whole roots in two pumpkin cultivars. (A) Time-dependent uptake of Si. Seedlings of 14-d-old were exposed to a solution containing 0.5 mM silicic acid for different times. (B) Concentration-dependent uptake of Si. Seedlings were exposed to a solution containing different concentrations of Si . (C) Si concentration in the xylem sap. Seedlings exposed to different Si concentrations for 24 hours were decapitated and the xylem sap was collected for 30 min. All data are means of three biological replicates.
Figure S2. Phylogenetic tree of silicon influx transporters in pumpkin (Cm-), rice (Os-), maize (Zm-), barley (Hv-) and zucchini CpNIP1. The 0.1 scale shows substitution distance.
Figure S3. Alignment of amino acid sequences of silicon influx transporters from rice (Os Lsi1) and two pumpkin cultivars (B+, Shintosa; B–, Super-unryu). Green boxes show amino acid residues composing ar/R selectivity filter and gray shadow shows NPA motifs. Pink box shows amino acid residue difference between two pumpkin cultivars
Figure S4. Localization of GFP-CmLsi1 fusion protein expressed in Xenopus oocyte. (a), (d) water injected control. (b), (e) GFP-CmLsi1(B+). (c), (f) GFP-CmLsi1(B+P242L). (a-c) confocal image of intact oocyte. (d-f) squashed oocyte. GFP-CmLsi1(B+) and GFP-CmLsi1(B+)P242L were digested from the vectors which were used for the subcellular localization assay, with XbaI and PstI. Then these fragments were inserted into oocyte expression vector pXßG-ev1. Oocytes injected with cRNA were squashed between the slide grass and cover grass, and GFP fluorescence was observed by laser-scanning confocal microscopy (LSM700; Carl Zeiss).
Appendix S1. Alignment used to generate the phylogenetic tree presented in Figure S2.
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer-reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
|TPJ_4483_sm_Figure-S1.eps||716K||Supporting info item|
|TPJ_4483_sm_Figure-S2.eps||419K||Supporting info item|
|TPJ_4483_sm_Figure-S3.eps||825K||Supporting info item|
|TPJ_4483_sm_Figure-S4.eps||16206K||Supporting info item|
|TPJ_4483_sm_Appendix-S1.doc||26K||Supporting info item|
|TPJ_4483_sm_Legends.doc||27K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.