Treatment of imported New World cutaneous leishmaniasis in Germany
Article first published online: 18 OCT 2011
© 2011 The International Society of Dermatology
International Journal of Dermatology
Volume 50, Issue 11, pages 1336–1342, November 2011
How to Cite
Harms, G., Scherbaum, H., Reiter-Owona, I., Stich, A. and Richter, J. (2011), Treatment of imported New World cutaneous leishmaniasis in Germany. International Journal of Dermatology, 50: 1336–1342. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.04987.x
Conflicts of interest: None
- Issue published online: 18 OCT 2011
- Article first published online: 18 OCT 2011
Background Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), a parasitic disease which represents a public health problem, particularly in Central and South America, has become a leading condition in travelers who return from tropical countries with skin disorders. Cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis, the most common causative agent, requires systemic treatment because it is potentially able to disseminate and to cause mucosal or mucocutaneous disease. Although several drugs are available for the systemic treatment of leishmaniases, a definitive treatment regimen for infection caused by species of the Viannia subgenus has yet to be established in many countries, including Germany.
Methods We analyzed treatment outcomes in 23 returnees from Central and South America who were diagnosed with L. (V.) braziliensis CL by polymerase chain reaction.
Results Complete cure within one month following treatment was observed in 18 patients (78%). Cure was achieved with liposomal amphotericin B in 11 of 13 patients, miltefosine in five of eight patients, and meglumine antimoniate in two (of two) patients. Of the five patients (22%) who failed to respond to initial therapy, four were cured with meglumine antimoniate and one with liposomal amphotericin B.
Conclusions In this outcome evaluation of treatment of imported L. (V.) braziliensis infections, liposomal amphotericin B, miltefosine, and meglumine antimoniate proved to be effective. Conventional meglumine antimoniate showed high efficacy as a first-line treatment and cured lesions that failed to respond to the other two drugs. A multi-country study using standardized treatment protocols is needed to establish a definitive regimen.