SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press, 2001.
  • 2
    Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Sutton PD. Births: preliminary data for 2002. National Vital Statistics Report, 2003; 51: 45.
  • 3
    Nassar N, Sullivan E. Australia's Mothers and Babies 1999. Sydney: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Perinatal Statistics Unit, 2001.
  • 4
    Eden KB, Hashima JN, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Guise J-M. Childbirth preferences after cesarean birth: a review of evidence. Birth, 2004; 31: 4960.
  • 5
    Emmett CL, Shaw ARG, Montgomery AA, Murphy DJ. Women's experience of decision-making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2006; 113: 14381445.
  • 6
    Anderson GM. Making sense of rising caesarean section rates. British Medical Journal, 2004; 329: 696697.
  • 7
    Fraser W, Maunsell E, Hodnett E, Moutquin J-M, the Childbirth Alternatives Post-Cesarean Study Group. Randomized controlled trial of a prenatal vaginal birth after cesarean section education and support program. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997; 176: 419425.
  • 8
    Walker R, Turnbull D, Pratt N, Wilkinson C. The development and process evaluation of an information-based intervention for pregnant women aimed at addressing rates of caesarean section. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2005; 112: 16051614.
  • 9
    Paterson-Brown S, Amu O, Rajendran S, Bolaji II. Education and debate: should doctors perform and elective caesarean section on request? British Medical Journal, 1998; 317: 462465.
  • 10
    Minkoff H, Chervenak FA. Elective primary cesarean delivery. New England Journal of Medicine, 2003; 348: 946950.
  • 11
    Department of Health. Changing Childbirth: Part I. Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: HMSO, 1993.
  • 12
    National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Caesarean Section: Clinical Guideline 13. London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence, 2004.
  • 13
    Lavender T, Kingdon C, Hart A, Gyte G, Gabbay M, Neilson JP. Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery. British Medical Journal, 2005; 331: 490491.
  • 14
    Kamal P, Dixon-Woods M, Kurinczuk JJ, Oppenheimer C, Squire P, Waugh J. Factors influencing repeat caesarean section: qualitative exploratory study of obstetricians’ and midwives accounts. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2005; 112: 17.
  • 15
    York S, Briscoe L, Walkinshaw S, Lavender T. Why women choose to have a repeat caesarean section. British Journal of Midwifery, 2005; 13: 440445.
  • 16
    O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V et al. Decision Aids for Patients Facing Health Treatment or Screening Decisions (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
  • 17
    O'Connor AM, Rostim A, Fiset V et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. British Medical Journal, 1999; 319: 731734.
  • 18
    Bekker HL, Hewison J, Thornton JG. Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome. Patient Education and Counseling, 2003; 50: 323329.
  • 19
    Roberts CL, Raynes-Greenow CH, Nassar N, Trevena L, McCaffery K. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for the management of pain in labour and childbirth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2004; 4: 24.
  • 20
    Roberts CL, Nassar N, Barratt A, Raynes-Greenow CH, Peat B, Henderson-Smart D. Protocol for the evaluation of a decision aid for women with a breech-presenting baby. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2004; 4: 26.
  • 21
    Shorten A, Chamberlain M, Shorten B, Kariminia A. Making choices for childbirth: development and testing of a decision-aid for women who have experienced previous caesarean. Patient Education and Counseling, 2004; 52: 307313.
  • 22
    Shorten A, Shorten B, Keogh J, West S, Morris J. Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after casarean. Birth, 2005; 32: 252261.
  • 23
    Chuang J-H, Jenders RA. Trial of Labor versus Elective Repeat Cesarean Section for the Women with Previous Cesarean Section: a Decision Analysis. Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Symposium, 1999: 226230.
  • 24
    Mankuta DD, Leshno MM, Menasche MM, Brezis MM. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: trial of labor or repeat cesarean section? A decision analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003; 189: 714719.
  • 25
    Shy KK, Logerfo JP, Karp LE. Evaluation of elective repeat cesarean section as a standard of care: an application of decision analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981; 139: 123129.
  • 26
    Elwyn G, Edwards A, Eccles M, Rovner D. Decision analysis in patient care. Lancet, 2001; 358: 571574.
  • 27
    Montgomery AA, Fahey T, Peters TJ. A factorial randomised controlled trial of decision analysis and an information video plus leaflet for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. British Journal of General Practice, 2003; 53: 446453.
  • 28
    Montgomery AA, the DiAMOND Study Group. The DiAMOND trial protocol: a randomised controlled trial of two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with a previous caesarean section. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2004; 4: 25.
  • 29
    Edwards A, Elwyn G, Mulley A. Explaining risks: turning numerical data in meaningful pictures. British Medical Journal, 2002; 324: 827830.
  • 30
    Paling J. Strategies to help patients understand risks. British Medical Journal, 2003; 327: 745748.
  • 31
    Wills CE, Holmes-Rovner M. Patient comprehension of information for shared treatment decision making: state of the art and future directions. Patient Education and Counseling, 2003; 50: 285290.
  • 32
    Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal, 2000; 321: 694696.
  • 33
    Elwyn G, O'Connor AM, Stacey D et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. British Medical Journal, 2006; 333: 417.
  • 34
    Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD. Challenges for designing and implementing decision aids. Patient Education and Counseling, 2004; 54: 265273.
  • 35
    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T, O'Brien MA. Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions. Health Expectations, 2005; 8: 114125.
  • 36
    Dowie J. The role of patients’ meta-preferences in the design and evaluation of decision support systems. Health Expectations, 2002; 5: 1627.