SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Department of Health. The New NHS: Modern Dependable. London: TSO, 1997.
  • 2
    Department of Health. Patient and Public Involvement in the New NHS. London: Department of Health, 1999.
  • 3
    Department of Health. Creating a Patient-led NHS: Delivering the NHS Improvement Plan. London: Department of Health, 2005.
  • 4
    Department of Health. High Quality Care for All – NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. London: Department of Health, 2008.
  • 5
    Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social Science & Medicine, 2000; 51: 10871100.
  • 6
    Kennedy I. Patients are experts in their own field. BMJ, 2003; 326: 12761277.
  • 7
    UK Government. Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/28/contents/enacted, accessed 10 April 2010.
  • 8
    Gillespie R, Florin D, Gillam S. How is patient-centred care understood by the clinical, managerial and lay stakeholders responsible for promoting this agenda?Health Expectations, 2004; 7: 142148.
  • 9
    Lewin S, Skea Z, Entwistle VA, Zwarenstein M, Dick J. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2001; Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003267. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.
  • 10
    Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 2002; 48: 5156.
  • 11
    Wressle E, Öeberg B, Henriksson C. The rehabilitation process for the geriatric stroke patient-an exploratory study of goal setting and interventions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1999; 21: 8087.
  • 12
    Cott C, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2007; 29: 1561574.
  • 13
    Ellis-Hill C, Robison J, Wiles R et al. Going home to get on with life: patients and carers experiences of being discharged from hospital following a stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2009; 31: 6172.
  • 14
    Redfern J, McKevitt C, Wolfe C. Risk management after stroke: the limits of a patient-centred approach. Health, Risk & Society, 2006; 8: 123141.
  • 15
    Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews2007, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD000197. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub2
  • 16
    Long A. The User’s Perspective in Outcome Measurement: An Overview of the Issues. 8. Leeds: UK Clearing House on Health Outcomes, University of Leeds, 1996.
  • 17
    Goodrich J. Exploring the wide range of terminology used to describe care that is patient-centred. Nursing Times, 2009; 105: 1417.
  • 18
    Burton C. Living with stroke: a phenomenological study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000; 32: 301309.
  • 19
    Visser-Meily A, Post M, Gorter J et al. Rehabilitation of stroke patients needs a family-centred approach. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2006; 28: 15571561.
  • 20
    Duncan P, Wallace D, Studenski S et al. Conceptualization of a new stroke-specific outcome measure: the Stroke Impact Scale. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2001; 8: 1933.
  • 21
    Dowswell G, Lawler J, Dowswell T et al. Investigating recovery from stroke: a qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2000; 9: 507515.
  • 22
    Kersten P, Low J, Ashburn A et al. The unmet needs of young people who have had a stroke: results of a national UK survey. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2002; 24: 860866.
  • 23
    Blickem C, Priyadharshini E. Patient narratives: the potential for ‘patient-centred’ interprofessional learning?Journal of Interprofessional Care, 2007; 21: 619632.
  • 24
    Brott T, Adams H, Olinger C et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke, 1989; 20: 864870.
  • 25
    Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 1965; 14: 6165.
  • 26
    Granger C, Hamilton B, Keith R et al. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 1986; 1: 5974.
  • 27
    Holbrook M, Skilbeck C. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 1983; 12: 166170.
  • 28
    Long A, Hesketh A, Paszek G et al. Development of a reliable self-report outcome measure for pragmatic trials of communication therapy following stroke: the Communication Outcome after Stroke (COAST) scale. Clinical Rehabilitation, 2008; 22: 10831094.
  • 29
    Kjellström T, Norrving B, Shatchkute A. The Helsingborg Declaration 2006 on European Stroke Strategies. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2007; 23: 229241.
  • 30
    Trigg R, Wood V, Hewer L. Social reintegration after stroke: the first stages in the development of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO). Clinical Rehabilitation, 1999; 13: 341353.
  • 31
    Harden A. Extending the boundaries of systematic reviews to integrate different types of study: examples of methods developed within reviews on young people’s health. In: Popay J (ed.) Moving Beyond Effectiveness in Evidence Synthesis. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2006: 3140.
  • 32
    Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic Reviews: CRD’s Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York, 2009.
  • 33
    Outpatient Service Trialists. Therapy-Based Rehabilitation Services for Stroke Patients at Home. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2003; Issue 1. Art. No. CD002925.
  • 34
    Petticrew M, Roberts H. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.
  • 35
    Lawrence M. Patient-Centred Stroke Care: Young Adults and their Families, PhD thesis. Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University, 2009.
  • 36
    Jackson J, Kinn S, Dalgarno P. Patient-centred outcomes in dietary research. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 2005; 18: 8392.
  • 37
    Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2008 edition. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute, 2008. http://www.joannabriggs.edu.au/Documents/JBIReviewManual_CiP11449.pdf, accessed 10 April 2010.
  • 38
    Garcia J, Bricker L, Henderson J et al. Women’s views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review. Birth, 2002; 29: 225250.
  • 39
    Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C et al. Evaluating Meta-Ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science & Medicine, 2003; 56: 671684.
  • 40
    Thomas J, Harden A, Oakley A et al. Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews. BMJ, 2004; 328: 10101012.
  • 41
    Glass T, Dym B, Greenberg S et al. Psychosocial intervention in stroke: Families in Recovery from Stroke Trial (FIRST). American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 2000; 70: 169181.
  • 42
    Glass T, Berkman L, Hiltunen E et al. The Families in Recovery From Stroke Trial (FIRST): primary study results. Psychosomatic Medicine, 2004; 66: 889897.
  • 43
    Secrest J. Transformation of the relationship: the experience of primary support persons of stroke survivors. Rehabilitation Nursing, 2000; 25: 9399.
  • 44
    Grant J, Davis L. Living with loss: the stroke family caregiver. Journal of Family Nursing, 1997; 3: 3656.
  • 45
    Fox L, Poulsen S, Bawden K et al. Critical elements and outcomes of a residential family-based intervention for aphasia caregivers. Aphasiology, 2004; 18: 11771199.
  • 46
    Nordehn G, Meredith A, Bye L. A preliminary investigation of barriers to achieving patient-centered communication with patients who have stroke-related communication disorders. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2006; 13: 6877.
  • 47
    Harris J, Eng J. Goal priorities identified through client-centred measurement in individuals with chronic stroke. Physiotherapy Canada, 2004; 56: 171176.
  • 48
    Clark J, Rugg S. The importance of independence in toileting: the views of stroke survivors and their occupational therapists. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2005; 68: 165171.
  • 49
    Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1998; 12: 338347.
  • 50
    Ekstam L, Uppgard B, von Koch L et al. Functioning in everyday life after stroke: a longitudinal study of elderly people receiving rehabilitation at home. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science, 2007; 27: 434446.
  • 51
    Studenski S, Wallace D, Duncan P et al. Predicting stroke recovery: three- and six-month rates of patient-centered functional outcomes based on the Orpington Prognostic Scale. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2001; 49: 308312.
  • 52
    Jansa J, Sicherl Z, Angleitner K et al. The use of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in clients with an acute stroke. WFOT Bulletin, 2004; 50: 1823.
  • 53
    Ljungberg C, Hanson E, Loevgren M. A home rehabilitation program for stroke patients: a pilot study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 2001; 15: 4453.
  • 54
    van Bennekom C, Jelles F, Lankhorst G et al. Value of measuring perceived problems in a stroke population. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1996; 10: 288294.
  • 55
    Kersten P, George S, Low J et al. The subjective index of physical and social outcome: its usefulness in a younger stroke population. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 2004; 27: 5963.
  • 56
    Cup E, Scholte op Reimer W, Thijssen M et al. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 2003; 17: 402409.
  • 57
    Townend E, Brady M, McLauglan K. A systematic evaluation of the adaptation of depression diagnostic methods for stroke survivors who have aphasia. Stroke, 2007; 38: 30763083.
  • 58
    Shuldham C, Fleming S, Yorke J. Undertaking a systematic review: the road to successful completion. Journal of Research in Nursing, 2008; 13: 282298.
  • 59
    Wade D, Hewer R. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1987; 50: 177182.
  • 60
    de Haan R, Limburg M, Bossuyut P et al. The clinical meaning of Rankin ‘handicap’ grades. Stroke, 1995; 26: 20272030.
  • 61
    Lavis J. How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking?PLoS Medicine, 2009; 6: e1000141.
  • 62
    Kirkevold M. The unfolding illness trajectory of stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2002; 24: 887898.
  • 63
    Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 2009; 339: b2700.