• 1
    Edwards AGK, Elwyn GJ. Evidence-Based Patient Choice – Inevitable or Impossible? New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  • 2
    Mazur DJ. Shared Decision Making in the Patient-Physician Relationship: Challenges Facing Patients, Physicians, and Medical Institutions. Tampa, FL: American College of Physician Executives, 2001.
  • 3
    Braddock CH 3rd, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1999; 282: 23132320.
  • 4
    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science and Medicine, 1997; 44: 681692.
  • 5
    Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S et al. Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Education and Counseling, 2001; 43: 522.
  • 6
    Makoul G. Perpetuating Passivity: A Study of Physician Patient Communication and Decision Making. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, 1992.
  • 7
    van Thiel J, Kraan HF, Van Der Vleuten CP. Reliability and feasibility of measuring medical interviewing skills: the revised Maastricht History-Taking and Advice Checklist. Medical Education, 1991; 25: 224229.
  • 8
    Roter DL. The Roter Method of Interaction Process Analysis. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University, Department of Health Policy and Management, 1991.
  • 9
    Kurtz SM, Silverman JD. The Calgary-Cambridge Referenced Observation Guides: an aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programmes. Medical Education, 1996; 30: 8389.
  • 10
    Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2003; 12: 9399.
  • 11
    Marvel MK, Schilling R, Doherty WJ, Baird MA. Levels of physician involvement with patients and their families. A model for teaching and research. Journal of Family Practice, 1994; 39: 535544.
  • 12
    Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. Journal of Family Practice, 2000; 49: 796804.
  • 13
    Simon D, Loh A, Harter M. Measuring (shared) decision-making--a review of psychometric instruments. Zeitschrift für ärztliche Fortbildung und Qualitätssicherung, 2007; 101: 259267.
  • 14
    Legare F, Moher D, Elwyn G, LeBlanc A, Gravel K. Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2007; 7: 30.
  • 15
    Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expectations, 2005; 8: 3442.
  • 16
    Goss C, Fontanesi S, Mazzi MA et al. Shared decision making: the reliability of the OPTION scale in Italy. Patient Education and Counseling, 2007; 66: 296302.
  • 17
    Siriwardena AN, Edwards AG, Campion P, Freeman A, Elwyn G. Involve the patient and pass the MRCGP: investigating shared decision making in a consulting skills examination using a validated instrument. British Journal of General Practice, 2006; 56: 857862.
  • 18
    Loh A, Simon D, Hennig K, Hennig B, Harter M, Elwyn G. The assessment of depressive patients’ involvement in decision making in audio-taped primary care consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 2006; 63: 314318.
  • 19
    Krones T, Keller H, Sonnichsen A et al. Absolute cardiovascular disease risk and shared decision making in primary care: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Family Medicine, 2008; 6: 218227.
  • 20
    Kremer H, Ironson G. Measuring the Involvement of People with HIV in Treatment Decision Making Using the Control Preferences Scale. Medical Decision Making, 2008; 28: 899908.
  • 21
    Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. The British Journal of General Practice, 2000; 50: 892899.
  • 22
    Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Grol R. Shared Decision Making. Measurement using the OPTION Instrument. Wageningen: Ponsen and Looijen BV, 2005.
  • 23
    Wirtz M, Caspar F. Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität.[Inter-rater Agreement and Inter-rater Reliability]. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2002.
  • 24
    Sprent P, Smeeton N. Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods. London: Chapman and Hall, 2007.
  • 25
    Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
  • 26
    Howell DC. Statistical Methods for Psychology. Florence: Cengage Learning Services, 2009.
  • 27
    Robinson BF, Bakeman R. ComKappa: A Windows 95 program for calculating kappa and related statistics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 1998; 30: 731732.
  • 28
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 1977; 33: 159174.
  • 29
    Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 1994; 6: 284290.
  • 30
    Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 1998; 17: 101110.
  • 31
    Bühner M. Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion [Introduction to Test and Questionnaire Construction]. Munich: Pearson Education, 2006.
  • 32
    Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making Sense of Factor Analysis. The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003.
  • 33
    Swets JA. Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis in Psychology and Diagnostics: Collected Papers. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.
  • 34
    Ellis PD. The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes. Statistical Power, Meta-analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  • 35
    Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990; 43: 543549.
  • 36
    Cicchetti DV, Feinstein AR. High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990; 43: 551558.
  • 37
    Weiss MC, Peters TJ. Measuring shared decision making in the consultation: a comparison of the OPTION and Informed Decision Making instruments. Patient Education and Counseling, 2008; 70: 7986.
  • 38
    Schneider A, Korner T, Mehring M, Wensing M, Elwyn G, Szecsenyi J. Impact of age, health locus of control and psychological co-morbidity on patients’ preferences for shared decision making in general practice. Patient Education and Counseling, 2006; 61: 292298.
  • 39
    Melbourne E, Sinclair K, Durand MA, Legare F, Elwyn G. Developing a dyadic OPTION scale to measure perceptions of shared decision making. Patient Education and Counseling, 2010; 78: 177183.