SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)Social Science & Medicine, 1997; 44: 681692.
  • 2
    Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. British Medical Journal, 1999; 319: 766771.
  • 3
    Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. British Journal of General Practice, 2000; 50: 892899.
  • 4
    Shields CG, Franks P, Fiscella K, Meldrum S, Epstein RM. Rochester participatory decision-making scale (RPAD): reliability and validity. Annals of Family Medicine, 2005; 3: 436442.
  • 5
    Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expectations, 2005; 8: 3442.
  • 6
    O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner D, Holmes-Rovner M, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. [update of Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(3):CD001431; PMID: 11686990]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews2003; 2: CD001431.
  • 7
    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science & Medicine, 1999; 49: 651661.
  • 8
    Elwyn G, Edwards A, Hood K et al. Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Family Practice, 2004; 21: 337346.
  • 9
    Murray E, Charles C, Gafni A. Shared decision-making in primary care: tailoring the Charles et al. model to fit the context of general practice. Patient Education and Counseling, 2006; 62: 205211.
  • 10
    Montori VM, Gafni A, Charles C. A shared treatment decision-making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians: the case of diabetes. Health Expectations, 2006; 9: 2536.
  • 11
    Vagholkar S, Hermiz O, Zwar N, Shortus T, Comino E, Harris M. Multidisciplinary care plans for diabetic patients: what do they contain?Australian Family Physician, 2007; 36: 279282.
  • 12
    Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1990.
  • 13
    Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1967.
  • 14
    NVivo qualitative data analysis software. QSR NVivo [Computer Program]. Version 2.0. Melbourne: QSR International Pty Ltd, 2002.
  • 15
    Beauchamp TL. The promise of the beneficence model for medical ethics. Journal of Contemporary Health Law & Policy, 1990; 6: 145155.
  • 16
    Bensing J. Bridging the gap: the separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Patient Education and Counseling, 2000; 39: 1725.
  • 17
    McGuire AL, McCullough LB, Weller SC, Whitney SN. Missed expectations? physicians’ views of patients’ participation in medical decision-makingMedical Care, 2005; 43: 466470.
  • 18
    Epstein RM, Campbell TL, Cohen-Cole SA, McWhinney IR, Smilkstein G. Perspectives on patient-doctor communication. Journal of Family Practice, 1993; 37: 377388.
  • 19
    Roland M. Linking physician pay to quality of care: a major experiment in the UK. New England Journal of Medicine, 2004; 351: 14481454.