Weak and strong publics: drawing on Nancy Fraser to explore parental participation in neonatal networks
Article first published online: 1 NOV 2011
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Volume 17, Issue 1, pages 104–115, February 2014
How to Cite
Gibson, A. J., Lewando-Hundt, G. and Blaxter, L. (2014), Weak and strong publics: drawing on Nancy Fraser to explore parental participation in neonatal networks. Health Expectations, 17: 104–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00735.x
- Issue published online: 12 JAN 2014
- Article first published online: 1 NOV 2011
- Accepted for publication 8 August 2011
- West Midlands Specialised Commissioning Team
- Grace's Research Fund
- health policy;
- _managed clinical networks;
- neonatal care;
- patient and public involvement
Aims We draw on the work of Nancy Fraser, and in particular her concepts of weak and strong publics, to analyze the process of parental involvement in managed neonatal network boards.
Background Public involvement has moved beyond the individual level to include greater involvement of both patients and the public in governance. However, there is relatively little literature that explores the nature and outcomes of long-term patient involvement initiatives or has attempted to theorize, particularly at the level of corporate decision making, the process of patient and public involvement.
Methods A repeated survey of all neonatal network managers in England was carried out in 2006–07 to capture developments and changes in parental representation over this time period. This elicited information about the current status of parent representation on neonatal network boards. Four networks were also selected as case studies. This involved interviews with key members of each network board, interviews with parent representatives, observation of meetings and access to board minutes.
Results Data collected show that a wide range of approaches to involving parents has been adopted. These range from decisions not to involve parents at this level to relatively well-developed systems designed to link parent representatives on network boards to parents in neonatal units.
Conclusion Despite these variations, we suggest that parental participation within neonatal services remains an example of a weak public because the parent representatives had limited participation with little influence on decision making.