SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Llewellyn-ThomasHA . Studying patients’ preferences in health care decision-making . Canadian Medical Association Journal , 1992 ; 147 : 859 .
  • 2
    Llewellyn-ThomasHA . Patients’ health-care decision making: a framework for descriptive and experimental investigations . Medical Decision Making , 1995 ; 15 : 101 .
  • 3
    CharlesC , GafniA , WhelanT . Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) . Social Science and Medicine , 1997 ; 44 : 681692 .
  • 4
    CharlesC , GafniA , WhelanT . Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model . Social Science and Medicine , 1999 ; 49 : 651661 .
  • 5
    CharlesC , GafniA , WhelanT , O’BrienM . Cultural influences on the physician-patient encounter: the case of shared treatment decision-making . Patient Education and Counseling , 2006 ; 63 : 262267 .
  • 6
    WennbergJ . Practice variation, shared decision-making and health care policy . In : EdwardsA , ElwynG ( eds ) Shared Decision-Making in Health Care: Achieving Evidence-Based Patient Choice . Oxford : Oxford University Press , 2009 : 13 .
  • 7
    ElwynG , O’ConnorA , StaceyD et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process . British Medical Journal , 2006 ; 333 : 417 .
  • 8
    IPDASi Assessment Brochure . http://www.ipdasi.org/IPDASi%20Information.pdf, accessed 15 June 2010 .
  • 9
    IPDAS Collaboration website: What‘s new section . http://www.ipdas.ohri.ca/news.html, accessed 15 June 2010 .
  • 10
    IPDAS Collaboration website. What are Patient Decision Aids?http://www.ipdas.ohri.ca.what.html, accessed 15 June 2010 .
  • 11
    IPDAS Collboration website. Home page. http://www.ipdas.ohri.ca/index.html, accessed 15 June 2010 .
  • 12
    O’ConnorA , Llewellyn-ThomasH , StaceyD ( eds ). IPDAS Collaboration Background Document . 2003 ; Available at: http://ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS_Background.pdf, accessed 31 January 2009 .
  • 13
    O’ConnorAM , StaceyD , EntwistleV et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions . Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews2003 ; Art. No.: CD001431. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431 .
  • 14
    CharlesC , RedkoC , WhelanT , GafniW , RenyoL . Doing nothing is no choice: lay constructions of treatment decision-making among women with early-stage breast cancer . Sociology of Health and Illness , 1998 ; 20 : 7195 .
  • 15
    TverskyA , KahnemanD . Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases . Science , 1974 ; 185 : 11241131 .
  • 16
    TverskyA , KahnemanD . The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice . Science , 1981 ; 211 : 453458 .
  • 17
    LoewensteinG , WeberEU , HseeCK , WelchN . Risk as feelings . Psychological Bulletin , 2001 ; 127 : 267286 .
  • 18
    SlovicP , FinucaneM , PetersE , MacGregorDG . The affect heuristic . In : GilovichT , GriffinD , KahnemanD ( eds ) Heuristics and Biases . New York : Cambridge University Press , 2002 : 397420 .
  • 19
    Von NeumannK , MorgansternO . Theory of Games and Economic Behavior . Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press , 1947 .
  • 20
    BellDE , FarquharPE . Perspective on utility theory . Operations Research , 1986 ; 34 : 179183 .
  • 21
    MichinaMJ . Choice under uncertainty: problems solved and unsolved . Economic Perspectives , 1987 ; 1 : 121154 .
  • 22
    FishburnPC . Expected utility: an anniversary and a new era . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 1988 ; 1 : 267288 .
  • 23
    WoloshinW , SchwartzLM , ByramS , FischhoffB , WelchHG . A new scale for assessing perceptions of chance . Medical Decision Making , 2000 ; 20 : 298307 .
  • 24
    WoloshinW , SchwartzLM , WelchHG . Risk charts: putting cancer in context . Journal of the National Cancer Institute , 2002 ; 94 : 799804 .
  • 25
    Feldman-StewartD , KocovskiN , McConnellBA , BrundageMD , MackillopWJ . Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions . Medical Decision Making , 2000 ; 20 : s228s238 .
  • 26
    EdwardsA , ElwynG , CoveyJ , MatthewsE , PillR . Presenting risk information – a review of the effects of “Framing” and other manipulations on patient outcomes . Journal of Health Communication , 2001 ; 6 : 6182 .
  • 27
    EdwardsA , ElwynG , MulleyA . Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures . British Medical Journal , 2002 ; 324 : 827830 .
  • 28
    SkolbekkenJ . Communicating the risk reduction achieved by cholesterol reducing drugs . British Medical Journal , 1998 ; 316 : 19561958 .
  • 29
    BekkerHL . The loss of reason in patient decision aid research: do checklists damage the quality of informed choice interventions?Patient Education and Counseling , 2010 ; 78 : 357364 .
  • 30
    ElwynG , O’ConnorAM , BennettC et al. Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi) . PLoS ONE2009 ; 4 : e4705 . Epub 2009 Mar 4 .
  • 31
    DurandM-A , StielM , BoivinJ , ElwynG . Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies . Patient Education and Counseling , 2008 ; 71 : 125135 .
  • 32
    O’ConnorAG , ElwynG , StaceyD ( eds ). IPDAS Voting Document . 2005 ; Available at: http://ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS_First_Round.pdf, accessed 31 January 2009 .
  • 33
    O’ConnorAG , ElwynG , StaceyD ( eds ). IPDAS Voting Document– 2nd Round . 2005 ; Available at:http://www.ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS_Second_Round.pdf, accessed 31 January 2009 .
  • 34
    IPDAS Collaboration . 2005 . Criteria for Judging the Quality of Patient Decision Aids . Available at: http://www.ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS_checklist.pdf, accessed 31 January 2009 .