• Open Access

Chronic Disease Management Programmes: an adequate response to patients’ needs?

Authors

  • Mieke Rijken PhD,

    1. Head of research programme
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Nienke Bekkema MA,

    1. PhD student, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Pauline Boeckxstaens MD,

    1. PhD student, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • François G. Schellevis MD PhD,

    1. Professor, Department of General Practice, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
    2. Head of research department, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jan M. De Maeseneer MD PhD,

    1. Professor, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Peter P. Groenewegen PhD

    1. Professor, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
    2. Director, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author

Mieke Rijken, PhD
Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL)
P.O. Box 1568
3500 BN Utrecht
the Netherlands
E-mail: m.rijken@nivel.nl

Abstract

Background  Inspired by American examples, several European countries are now developing disease management programmes (DMPs) to improve the quality of care for patients with chronic diseases. Recently, questions have been raised whether the disease management approach is appropriate to respond to patient-defined needs.

Objective  In this article we consider the responsiveness of current European DMPs to patients’ needs defined in terms of multimorbidity, functional and participation problems, and self-management.

Method  Information about existing DMPs was derived from a survey among country-experts. In addition, we made use of international scientific literature.

Results  Most European DMPs do not have a solid answer yet to the problem of multimorbidity. Methods of linking DMPs, building extra modules to deal with the most prevalent comorbidities and integration of case management principles are introduced. Rehabilitation, psychosocial and reintegration support are not included in all DMPs, and the involvement of the social environment of the patient is uncommon. Interventions tailored to the needs of specific social or cultural patient groups are mostly not available. Few DMPs provide access to individualized patient information to strengthen self-management, including active engagement in decision making.

Conclusion  To further improve the responsiveness of DMPs to patients’ needs, we suggest to monitor ‘patient relevant outcomes’ that might be based on the ICF-model. To address the needs of patients with multimorbidity, we propose a generic comprehensive model, embedded in primary care. A goal-oriented approach provides the opportunity to prioritize goals that really matter to patients.

Ancillary