SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    McKieJ , ShrimptonB , HurworthR , BellC , RichardsonJ . Who should be involved in health care decision making? A qualitative studyHealth Care Analysis , 2008 ; 16 : 114126 .
  • 2
    TorgensonD , GosdonT . Priority setting in health care: should we ask the tax payer?British Medical Journal , 2000 ; 320 : 1699 .
  • 3
    JordanJ , DowswellT , HarrisonS , LilfordR , MortM . Health needs- assessment: whose priorities? Listening to users and the publicBritish Medical Journal , 1998 ; 316 : 16681670 .
  • 4
    BruniR , LaupacisA , MartinD . Public engagement in setting priorities in health care . Canadian Medical Association Journal , 2008 ; 179 : 1518 .
  • 5
    RosenP , KarlbergI . Opinions of Swedish citizens, Health-care politicians, administrators and doctors on rationing and health-care financing . Health Expectations , 2002 ; 5 : 148155 .
  • 6
    SorokaSN , LimET . Issue definition and the opinion-policy link: public preferences and health care spending in the US and UK . British Journal of Politics and International Relations , 2003 ; 5 : 576593 .
  • 7
    VigodaE . From responsiveness to collaboration: governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration . Public Administration Review , 2003 ; 62 : 527540 .
  • 8
    ManzaJ , CookFL , PageBI . Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy . New York : Oxford University Press , 2002 .
  • 9
    BarzelayM . The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue . Berkeley & Los Angeles : University of California Press , 2001 .
  • 10
    LynnLEJr . The new public management: how to transform a theme into a legacy . Public Administration Review , 1998 ; 58 : 231237 .
  • 11
    HoodC . A public management for all seasons?Public Administration , 1991 ; 69 : 319 .
  • 12
    BursteinP . Why estimates of the impact of public opinion on public policy are too high . Social Forces , 2006 ; 84 : 22732289 .
  • 13
    HoboltSB , KlemmemsenR . Responsive government? Public opinion and government policy preferences in Britain and DenmarkPolitical Studies , 2005 ; 53 : 379402 .
  • 14
    CopeGH . Bureaucratic reform and issues of political responsiveness . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 1997 ; 7 : 461471 .
  • 15
    DurantRF . The democratic deficit in America . Political Science Quarterly , 1995 ; 110 : 2547 .
  • 16
    EriksonRS , WrightGC , McIverJP . Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press , 1993 .
  • 17
    LijphartA . Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries . New Haven and London : Yale University Press , 1984 .
  • 18
    DahlRA . Pluralist Democracy in the United States: Conflict and Consent . Chicago : Rand McNally , 1967 .
  • 19
    CoulterA . The Autonomous Patient: Ending Paternalism in Medical Care . London : Nuffield Trust , 2002 .
  • 20
    DeberR , KraetschmerN , UrowitzS , SharpeN . Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populationsHealth Expectations , 2007 ; 10 : 248258 .
  • 21
    MarshallM , LeathermanS , MattkeS . Selecting indicators for the quality of health promotion, prevention and primary care at the health systems level in OECD countries . OECD Health Technical Papers , 2004 ; 16 : 149 .
  • 22
    DonaldsonM , YordyK , VanselowN , eds . Defining Primary Care: An Interim Report . Washington, DC : National Academy Press , 1994 .
  • 23
    Mosby Elsevier . Mosby’s Medical Dictionary , 8th edn . St Louis, MO : Mosby , 2009 .
  • 24
    SegenJC.McGraw-Hill Concise Dictionary of Modern Medicine . New York : McGraw-Hill , 2002 .
  • 25
    SafranDG , KosinskiM , TarlovAR et al. The Primary Care Assessment Survey: tests of data quality and measurement performance . Medical Care , 1998 ; 36 : 728739 .
  • 26
    ParasuramanA , BerryL , ZeithamlVA . SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality . Journal of Retailing , 1988 ; 64 : 1240 .
  • 27
    McAvoyBR , KanerEF , LockCA , HeatherN , GilvarryE . Our healthier nation: are general practitioners willing and able to deliver? A survey of attitudes to and involvement in health promotion and lifestyle counsellingBritish Journal of General Practice , 1999 ; 49 : 187190 .
  • 28
    StottNCH , PillRM . “Advise yes, dictate no.” Patients’ views on health promotion in the consultation . Family Practice , 1990 ; 7 : 125131 .
  • 29
    HutchisonBG , AbelsonJ , WoodwardCA , NormanG . Preventive care and barriers to effective prevention. How do family physicians see it? . Canadian Family Physician , 1996 ; 42 : 16931700 .
  • 30
    GoetzelR . Do prevention or treatment services save money? The wrong debate . Health Affairs , 2009 ; 28 : 3741 .
  • 31
    CohenJ , NeumanP , WeinsteinM . Does preventive care save money? Health economics and the presidential candidatesNew England Journal of Medicine , 2008 ; 358 : 661663 .
  • 32
    SmoohaS . Ethnic democracy: Israel as an Archetype . Israel Studies , 1997 ; 2 : 198241 .
  • 33
    AlfordJ . Defining the client in the public sector: a social – exchange perspective . Public Administration Review , 2002 ; 62 : 337346 .
  • 34
    AlfordJ . Rethinking the public: paying attention to citizens and clients [online] . In : GloverD , PatmoreG , JungwirthG ( eds ) For the People: Reclaiming Our Government . Sydney : Pluto Press in association with the Australian Fabian Society , 2000 : 566 .