SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Ryan A, Wilson S, Greenfield S, Clifford S, McManus RJ, Pattison HM. Range of self-tests available to buy in the United Kingdom: an Internet survey. Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England), 2006b; 28: 370.
  • 2
    Ronda G, Portegijs P, Dinant GJ, Buntinx F, Norg R, Van der Weijden T. Use of diagnostic self-tests on body materials among Internet users in the Netherlands: prevalence and correlates of use. BMC Public Health, 2009; 9: 100.
  • 3
    Ryan A, Greenfield S, Wilson S. Prevalence and determinants of the use of self-tests by members of the public: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health, 2006a; 6: 193.
  • 4
    Grispen JEJ, Ickenroth MHP, De Vries NK, Dinant GJ, Ronda G, Van der Weijden T. Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol). BMC Public Health, 2010; 10: 453.
  • 5
    Ickenroth MHP, Ronda G, Grispen JEJ, Dinant G, De Vries N, Van der Weijden T. How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey. BMC Family Practice, 2010; 11: 77.
  • 6
    Borriello SP. Science, medicine, and the future. Near patient microbiological tests. British Medical Journal, 1999; 319: 298301.
  • 7
    Campbell S, Klein R. Home testing to detect human immunodeficiency virus: boon or bane? Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006; 44: 34733476.
  • 8
    Frith L. HIV self-testing: a time to revise current policy. Lancet, 2007; 369: 243245.
  • 9
    Ryan A, Greenfield S, McManus R, Wilson S. Self-care–has DIY gone too far? British Journal of General Practice, 2006; 56: 907908.
  • 10
    Franck M, Foulon V, Van Vaerenbergh L. ABOP, the automatic patient information leaflet optimizer: evaluation of a tool in development. Patient Education and Counseling, 2011; 83: 411416.
  • 11
    Humphris G, Duncalf M, Holt D, Field E. The experimental evaluation of an oral cancer information leaflet. Oral oncology, 1999; 35: 575582.
  • 12
    Pander Maat H, Lentz L. Improving the usability of patient information leaflets. Patient Education and Counseling, 2010; 80: 113119.
  • 13
    Beaver K, Luker K. Readability of patient information booklets for women with breast cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 1997; 31: 95102.
  • 14
    Dickinson D, Raynor D, Duman M. Patient information leaflets for medicines: using consumer testing to determine the most effective design. Patient Education and Counseling, 2001; 43: 147159.
  • 15
    Datta AK, Selman TJ, Kwok T, Tang T, Khan KS. Quality of information accompanying on-line marketing of home diagnostic tests. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2008; 101: 3438.
  • 16
    Health Council of the Netherlands. Annual Report on Screening for Disease 2007 – The Self-testing of Body Samples. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands, 2007.
  • 17
    Wielders JPM, Loeber JG, Bartels PCM. Praktische consequenties van IVD-Richtlijn voor laboratoria, kansen en beperkingen [Practical consequences of IVD guidelines for laboratories, opportunities and limitations]. Nederlands tijdschrift voor klinische chemie en laboratoriumgeneeskunde, 2004; 29: 209213.
  • 18
    Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. British Medical Journal, 2006; 333: 417423.
  • 19
    Elwyn G, O'Connor AM, Bennett C et al. Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). PLoS One, 2009; 4: 3: e4705, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004705.
  • 20
    Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1999; 53: 105111.
  • 21
    Charnock D, Shepperd S, Rose P, Lucassen A. Discern Genetics Quality Criteria, 2006.
  • 22
    Van Drongelen AW, De Vries CGJCA, Pot JWGA. Assessment of Files of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices for Self-testing. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 2008.
  • 23
    Grispen JEJ, Ronda G, Dinant GJ, de Vries NK, van der Weijden T. To test or not to test: a cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV. BMC Public Health, 2011; 11: 112.
  • 24
    Ickenroth MH, Grispen JE, Ronda G, Tacken M, Dinant GJ, de Vries NK et al. Motivation and experiences of self-testers regarding tests for cardiovascular risk factors. Health Expectations, 2011; doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00733.x [Epub ahead of print].
  • 25
    Michel CE, Saison FG, Joshi H, Mahilum-Tapay LM, Lee HH. Pitfalls of Internet-accessible diagnostic tests: inadequate performance of a CE-marked Chlamydia test for home use. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 2009; 85: 187.
  • 26
    Car J, Lang B, Colledge A, Ung C, Majeed A. Interventions for enhancing consumers' online health literacy. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011; 6. Art. No.: CD007092, doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd007092.pub2.