SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Berger JT. Redefining the domains of decision making by physician and patient. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 2011; 65: 828830.
  • 2
    Crutchfield TN, Morgan RM. Building long-term patient-physician relationships. Health Marketing Quarterly, 2010; 27: 215243.
  • 3
    Carlsen B, Aavik A. Patient involvement in clinical decision-making: the effect of GP attitude on patient satisfaction. Health Expectations, 2006; 9: 148157.
  • 4
    Vick S, Scott A. Agency in health care. Examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship. Journal of Health Economics, 1998; 17: 587605.
  • 5
    Kalda R, Polluste K, Lember M. Patient satisfaction with care is associated with personal choice of physician. Health Policy, 2003; 64: 5562.
  • 6
    Chan CM, Azman WA. Attitudes and role orientations on doctor-patient fit and patient satisfaction in cancer care. Singapore Medical Journal, 2012; 53: 5256.
  • 7
    Haskard KB, Williams SL, DiMatteo MR, Rosenthal R, White MK, Goldstein MG. Physician and patient communication training in primary care: effects on participation and satisfaction. Health Psychology, 2008; 27: 513522.
  • 8
    Ryan J, Sysko J. The contingency of patient preferences for involvement in health decision making. Health Care Management Review, 2007; 32: 3036.
  • 9
    Langer A, Schroder-Back P, Brink A, Eurich J. The agency problem and medical acting: an example of applying economic theory to medical ethics. Medical Health Care and Philosophy, 2009; 12: 99108.
  • 10
    Heath J. The uses and abuses of agency theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2009; 19: 497528.
  • 11
    Angell M. The doctor as double agent. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1993; 3: 279286.
  • 12
    Shortell SM, Waters TM, Clarke KWB, Budetti PP. Physicians as double agents. Maintaining trust in an era of multiple accountabilities. JAMA, 1998; 280: 11021108.
  • 13
    Rutherford MA, Buchholtz AK. Investigating the relationship between board characteristics and board information. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2007; 15: 576584.
  • 14
    Spraggon M, Bodolica V. Post-acquisition structuring of CEO pay packages: incentives and punishments. Strategic Organization, 2011; 9: 187221.
  • 15
    Gafni A, Charles C, Whelan T. The physician-patient encounter: the physician as a perfect agent for the patient versus the informed treatment decision-making model. Social Science & Medicine, 1998; 47: 347354.
  • 16
    Mooney G, Ryan M. Agency in health care: getting beyond first principles. Journal of Health Economics, 1993; 12: 125135.
  • 17
    Nguyen H. The principal-agent problems in health care: evidence from prescribing patterns of private providers in Vietnam. Health Policy and Planning, 2011; 26: 5362.
  • 18
    Christianson JB, Leatherman S, Sutherland K. Lessons from evaluations of purchaser pay-for-performance programs: a review of the evidence. Medical Care Research and Review, 2008; 65: 5S35S.
  • 19
    Golden BR. The cost of pay-for-performance in healthcare: an alternative view. Healthcare Papers, 2006; 6: 3946.
  • 20
    Rowe JW. Pay-for-performance and accountability: related themes in improving health care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2006; 145: 695699.
  • 21
    Deshpande SP, Joseph J, Prasad R. Factors impacting ethical behavior in hospitals. Journal of Business Ethics, 2006; 69: 207216.
  • 22
    Johnson GL, Ramaprasad A. Patient-physician relationships in the information age. Marketing Health Services, 2000; 20: 2027.
  • 23
    Dwyer D, Liu H, Rizzo JA. Does patient trust promote better care? Applied Economics, 2012; 44: 22832295.
  • 24
    Xie B, Dilts DM, Shor M. The physician-patient relationship: the impact of patient-obtained medical information. Health Economics, 2006; 15: 813833.
  • 25
    Braithwaite J, Travaglia JF. An overview of clinical governance policies, practices and initiatives. Australian Health Review, 2008; 32: 1022.
  • 26
    Schneider U, Ulrich V. The physician-patient relationship revisited: the patient's view. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 2008; 8: 279300.
  • 27
    Ryan M. Agency in health care: lessons for economists from sociologists. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1994; 53: 207217.
  • 28
    Schneider U. Asymmetric information and the demand for health care – the case of double moral hazard. Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 2004; 124: 233256.
  • 29
    Iizuka T. Experts' agency problem: evidence from the prescription drug market in Japan. Rand Journal of Economics, 2007; 38: 844862.
  • 30
    Bauer K. Cybermedicine and the moral integrity of the physician-patient relationship. Ethics and Information Technology, 2004; 6: 8391.
  • 31
    Mechanic D, Meyer S. Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness. Social Science & Medicine, 2000; 51: 657668.
  • 32
    Thom DH, Hall MA, Pawlson LG. Measuring patients' trust in physicians when assessing quality of care. Health Affairs, 2004; 23: 124132.
  • 33
    Miller J. The other side of trust in health care: prescribing drugs with the potential for abuse. Bioethics, 2007; 21: 5160.
  • 34
    Skirbekk H. Negotiated or taken-for-granted trust? Explicit and implicit interpretations of trust in a medical setting. Medical Health Care and Philosophy, 2009; 12: 37.
  • 35
    Skirbekk H, Middelthon A-L, Hjortdahl P, Finset A. Mandates of trust in the doctor-patient relationship. Qualitative Health Research, 2011; 21: 11821190.
  • 36
    Schenker Y, White DB, Asch DA, Kahn JM. Healthcare system distrust in the intensive care unit. Journal of Critical Care, 2012; 27: 310.
  • 37
    O'Neill O. A Question of Trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • 38
    Leisen B, Hyman MR. Antecedents and consequences of trust in a service provider: the case of primary care physicians. Journal of Business Research, 2004; 57: 990999.
  • 39
    Sullivan R. Building trust through governance: lessons from tri-sector partnerships in the extractive industries. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2007; 25: 5576.
  • 40
    Gray H. Trust and trustworthy care in the managed care era. Health Affairs, 1997; 16: 3449.
  • 41
    Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. Journal of Family Practice, 1998; 47: 213220.
  • 42
    Pearson SD, Raeke LH. Patients' trust in physicians: many theories, few measures, and little data. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2000; 15: 509513.
  • 43
    Kao AC, Green DC, Davis NA, Koplan JP, Cleary PD. Patients' trust in their physicians: effects of choice, continuity, and payment method. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1998; 13: 681686.
  • 44
    Thom DH, Campbell B. Patient-physician trust: an exploratory study. Journal of Family Practice, 1997; 44: 169176.
  • 45
    Lee Y-Y, Lin JL. The effects of trust in physician on self-efficacy, adherence and diabetes outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 2009; 68: 10601068.
  • 46
    Jotkowitz AB, Glick S, Porath A. A physician charter on medical professionalism: a challenge for medical education. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 2004; 15: 59.
  • 47
    Atkins CGK. The failure of formal rights and equality in the clinic: a critique of bioethics. Ethics & Medicine, 2005; 21: 139162.
  • 48
    Evans M, Bergum V, Bamforth S, MacPhail S. Relational ethics and genetic counseling. Nursing Ethics, 2004; 11: 459471.
  • 49
    Magill G, Prybil L. Stewardship and integrity in health care: a role for organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 2004; 50: 225238.
  • 50
    Hall MA. Arrow on trust. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2001; 26: 11311144.
  • 51
    Lim J-Y. The effect of patient's asymmetric information problem on elderly use of medical care. Applied Economics, 2007; 39: 21332142.
  • 52
    Balkrishnan R, Duganm E, Camacho FT, Hall MA. Trust and satisfaction with physicians, insurers, and the medical profession. Medical Care, 2003; 41: 10581064.
  • 53
    Baker R, Mainous AG, Gray DP, Love MM. Exploration of the relationship between continuity, trust in regular doctors and patient satisfaction with consultations with family doctors. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2003; 21: 2732.
  • 54
    Tarn DM, Meredith LS, Kagawa-Singer M et al. Trust in one's physician: the role of ethnic match, autonomy, acculturation, and religiosity among Japanese and Japanese Americans. Annals of Family Medicine, 2005; 3: 339347.
  • 55
    Kraetschmer N, Sharpe N, Urowitz S, Deber RB. How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making? Health Expectations, 2004; 7: 317326.
  • 56
    Kaplan KJ, Schneiderhan M, Harrow M, Omens R. Autonomy, gender, and preference for paternalistic or informative physicians: a study of the doctor-patient relation. Ethics & Medicine, 2002; 18: 4960.
  • 57
    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine, 1997; 44: 681692.
  • 58
    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science & Medicine, 1999; 49: 651661.
  • 59
    Weiss GG. The new doctor-patient paradigm. Medical Economics, 2008; 85: 4854.
  • 60
    Clawson AL. The relationship between clinical decision making and ethical decision making. Physiotherapy, 1994; 80: 1014.
  • 61
    Kassirer JP. Patient, physicians and the internet. Health Affairs, 2000; 19: 115123.
  • 62
    Davies M, Elwyn G. Advocating mandatory patient ‘autonomy’ in healthcare: adverse reactions and side effects. Health Care Analysis, 2008; 16: 315328.
  • 63
    Erdem SA, Harrison-Walker LJ. The role of the Internet in physician-patient relationships: the issue of trust. Business Horizons, 2006; 49: 387393.
  • 64
    Sciamanna CN, Clark MA, Diaz JA, Newton M. Filling the gaps in physician communication: the role of the Internet among the primary care patients. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2003; 72: 18.
  • 65
    Sommerhalder K, Abraham A, Zufferey MC, Barth J, Abel T. Internet information and medical consultations: experiences from patients' and physicians' perspectives. Patient Education and Counseling, 2009; 77: 266271.
  • 66
    Dworkin G. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  • 67
    De Roubaix JAM. Beneficence, non-maleficence, distributive justice and respect for patient autonomy – reconcilable ends in aesthetic surgery? Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2011; 64: 1116.
  • 68
    Delany CM. Respecting patient autonomy and obtaining their informed consent: ethical theory – missing in action. Physiotherapy, 2005; 91: 197203.
  • 69
    Harris J. The Value of Life: An Introduction to Medical Ethics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985.
  • 70
    Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision making. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 1997; 2: 112121.
  • 71
    Entwistle VA, Watt IS. Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: the case for a broader conceptual framework. Patient Education and Counseling, 2006; 63: 268278.
  • 72
    Schneider C. The Practice of Autonomy: Patients, Doctors, and Medical Decisions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1998.
  • 73
    Cecil D, Killeen I. Control, compliance and satisfaction in the family practice encounter. Family Medicine, 1997; 29: 653657.
  • 74
    Lee Y-Y, Lin JL. Do patient autonomy preferences matter? Linking patient-centered care to patient-physician relationships and health outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 2010; 71: 18111818.
  • 75
    Mukherjee A, McGinnis J. E-health: an analysis of key themes in research. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 2007; 1: 349363.
  • 76
    Ouschan R, Sweeney J, Johnson L. Customer empowerment and relationship outcomes in healthcare consultations. European Journal of Marketing, 2006; 40: 10681086.
  • 77
    Fang H, Rizzo JA. Information-oriented patients and physician career satisfaction: is there a link? Health Economics, Policy and Law, 2011; 6: 295311.
  • 78
    Ball MJ, Lillis J. E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2001; 61: 110.
  • 79
    Wald HS, Dube CE, Anthony DC. Untangling the Web – the impact of Internet use on health care and the physician-patient relationship. Patient Education and Counseling, 2007; 68: 218224.
  • 80
    Greaney AM, O'Mathuna DP, Scott PA. Patient autonomy and choice in healthcare: self-testing devices as a case in point. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2011; Epub ahead of print.
  • 81
    Axtell-Thompson LM. Consumer directed health care: ethical limits to choice and responsibility. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2005; 30: 207226.
  • 82
    Levy N. Forced to be free? Increasing patient autonomy by constraining it. Journal of Medical Ethics, 2012; Epub ahead of print.
  • 83
    Kalliainen LK, Lichtman DM. Current issues in the physician-patient relationship. Journal of Hand Surgery, 2010; 35: 21262129.
  • 84
    Rogers WA. Is there a moral duty for doctors to trust patients? Journal of Medical Ethics, 2002; 28: 7780.
  • 85
    Wirtz V, Cribb A, Barber N. Patient–doctor decision-making about treatment within the consultation—A critical analysis of models. Social Science & Medicine, 2006; 62: 116124.
  • 86
    Verweij M, Lelie A. Futility without a dichotomy: towards an ideal physician-patient relationship. Bioethics, 2003; 17: 2131.
  • 87
    Lown BA, Hanson JL, Clark WD. Mutual influence in shared decision making: a collaborative study of patients and physicians. Health Expectations, 2009; 12: 160174.
  • 88
    Armstrong K, Ravenell KL, McMurphy S, Putt M. Racial/ethnic differences in physician distrust in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 2007; 97: 12831289.
  • 89
    Berger JT. The influence of physicians' demographic characteristics and their patients' demographic characteristics on physician practice: implications for education and research. Academic Medicine, 2008; 83: 100105.
  • 90
    Street R. Information-giving in medical consultations: the influence of patients' communicative styles and personal characteristics. Social Science & Medicine, 1991; 32: 541548.
  • 91
    Meeuwesen L, Schaap C, Van Der Staak C. Verbal analysis of doctor-patient communication. Social Science & Medicine, 1991; 32: 11431150.
  • 92
    Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Education and Counseling, 2006; 60: 102114.
  • 93
    Clark JA, Potter DA, McKinlay JB. Bringing social structure back into clinical decision making. Social Science & Medicine, 1991; 32: 853866.
  • 94
    Falkum E, Forde R. Paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation in the physician-patient relationship: attitudes among Norwegian physicians. Social Sciences & Medicine, 2001; 52: 239248.
  • 95
    Murtagh FEM, Thorns A. Group evaluation and ethical review of a tool to explore patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making. Journal of Medical Ethics, 2006; 32: 311315.
  • 96
    Ford S, Schofield T, Hope T. Observing decision-making in the general practice consultation: who makes which decisions? Health Expectations, 2006; 9: 130137.
  • 97
    Saha S, Arbelaez JJ, Cooper LA. Patient-physician relationships and racial disparities in the quality of health care. American Journal of Public Health, 2003; 93: 17131719.
  • 98
    Henry MS. Uncertainty, responsibility, and the evolution of the physician/patient relationship. Journal of Medical Ethics, 2006; 32: 321323.
  • 99
    Bodolica V, Spraggon M. Contractual and relational family firm governance: substitution or complementarity. Corporate Ownership and Control, 2010; 8: 497507.