SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

While recent studies from the developed western countries suggest that the prevalence of asthma and allergic disease may be reaching a plateau (1, 2), countries with communities in transition have experienced a dramatic increase over the last few years (3). The puzzle of the cause of this reported increase is complex, and there is no simple explanation or unique hypothesis that would be applicable for every phenotype or every population. Different environmental exposures including diet, hygiene and infections, allergens and air pollution, in combination with genetic factors could account for the observed variability.

In this issue of journal, Viinanen et al. present the data from a population-based study investigating the prevalence of clinically defined allergic diseases in urban and rural Mongolia (4). The results indicate a lower prevalence of allergies in rural Mongolia with increasing in prevalence with increasing urbanization. The authors suggest that differences in exposure to an agricultural environment (fermented milk products, herd animals) could possibly explain the observed differences. The findings are in line with what we have learnt from the majority of studies looking into differences between urban and rural populations worldwide.

Allergy in urban and rural settings

  1. Top of page
  2. Allergy in urban and rural settings
  3. Hygiene hypothesis within the urban-rural context
  4. Air pollution and allergens and rising trends in respiratory allergies
  5. Conclusions
  6. References

Differences in the prevalence of allergic disease between urban and rural areas have been observed in many parts of the world. Such studies offered an excellent framework to investigate the potential risk or protective factors. Early studies from Africa (South Africa, Ethiopia, Kenya and Ghana) pointed out that populations living in rural areas (i.e. not exposed to the effects of an urban or western lifestyle) experienced a very low burden of allergic disease (5–8). A traditional rural way of living and the role of parasite infections were examined as possible protective factors. A series of studies from Asia (China, Japan, Korea, India and Saudi Arabia) confirmed the urban-rural gradient, exploring the role of exposure to different allergens, air pollution, affluence and diet in the development of allergy (9–13).

Rural farming vs rural nonfarming, ‘old cities’vs‘new cities’

However, not every rural environment confers the same degree of protection. In Europe, attention has focussed towards studies exploring the differences between rural farming and rural nonfarming communities, since the risk of asthma and allergies was found to lowest amongst rural farming community (14–17). A ‘protective’ farming effect associated with a close contact to livestock, use of unpasteurized milk and increasing entodoxin exposure is currently under exploration, and the proposed gene by environment interactions involving important innate immunity genes offer insights into potential mechanisms (18).

Similarly, not every urban environment increases the risk of allergic disease. In South Asia a higher prevalence of wheeze (28.7 vs 12.5%) was found in children living in an old fashioned, congested, city than in a clean modern city with concrete housing, vehicle emission regulations and the use of smoke-free household fuel (19).

Definition of urban and rural areas

However, it has to be emphasized that studies from different parts of the world may not be comparable, as there are often important differences in the way urban and rural setting has been defined. In a nationwide study in Sweden according to the Population and Housing Censuses ‘urban’ is defined as a home located in a settlement with at least 200 inhabitants (15). In a recent study from the US, the nonurban population was defined on the basis of metropolitan statistical area codes (MSA) (US Department of the census) (20). MSA codes are numbered one to eight, with one denoting a district within a central city with a population of greater than 250 000. The following MSA codes were used to define the eligible ‘rural’ population: MSA (6) ‘small town’ = a small town not within an MSA and with a population of less than 25 000 and greater or equal 2500 people, MSA (7) ‘rural outside an MSA’ = a place with less than 2500 people and coded rural outside an MSA, and MSA (8) ‘Rural inside an MSA’ = a place with less than 2500 people and coded rural inside an MSA, by the census bureau. In the study from Mongolia subjects were randomly selected from an urban city, three rural towns and seven villages with a population of grater than 750 000, between 15 000–20 000 and 1000–2000 inhabitants, respectively. In a study from Kenya comparing EIB in urban and rural children, the subjects representing the urban population were selected from Nairobi, a city of over 2 million inhabitants (6).

It is obvious that a variety of different urban and rural definitions based on population numbers are used worldwide, making it difficult to compare studies from different continents. Furthermore, different populations may have different lifestyles and cultures, different environmental exposures and different genetic backgrounds.

Effect of urban living on different phenotypes

It is often implied that allergic sensitization, hayfever and asthma have increased in parallel. This, however, may not necessarily be true, and the increase in asthma may not be contemporaneous with, nor secondary to an increase in inflammation and allergic response with which it is closely associated (21). Studies of urban-rural differences appear to indirectly suggest that this is the case. Whilst a higher prevalence of allergy has consistently been reported in different urban areas, the observed pattern in terms of the effect on various allergy phenotypes (e.g. asthma vs sensitization) and identified risk factors has differed between different studies. In the Mongolian study the prevalence of allergic sensitization and allergic rhinoconjuctivitis increased significantly with increasing urbanization, whilst asthma differed significantly from rural areas only in terms of severity, but not the prevalence (4). The pattern of sensitization was also different between urban and rural Mongolia, with sensitization to pollens being remarkably higher in urban areas. In Gambia, despite a relatively high prevalence of positive skin tests to aeroallergens in both urban and rural areas the prevalence of wheeze was not significantly associated with atopy (22).

The major difference between urban and rural areas may not be in the prevalence of these different phenotypes, but in the nature of their relationship: while atopy and wheeze appear to exist in rural settings unrelated to each other, the characteristic of most urban areas is a strong association between atopy and asthma.

Is ‘affluence’ responsible for the urban-rural differences?

The observed urban-rural differences may be confounded by the socio-economic status. In a study from Cape Town, Mercer et al. examined the relationship between symptom prevalence and severity, socio-economic status, recent urbanization and upward socio-economic mobility (23). The findings suggested an increased prevalence of rhinitis symptoms in the higher socio-economic group. Similarly, in Zimbabwe and Ghana the prevalence of exercise induced bronchospasm and atopy was found to be higher in urban rich than in urban poor children, indicating the importance of affluence rather than locality (Fig. 1) (8). However, in studies from Kenya, wealth status had no impact on asthma prevalence (6), and amongst rural children there was no association between immune responses to allergens and airway symptoms (24). In the US, an increased risk was reported for all children living in an urban setting regardless of race or income, suggesting that other environmental factors are important for the increased risk in urban areas (25).

image

Figure 1. Due to cultural and linguistic differences in the developing countries, it is often difficult to adopt a universally accepted definition of asthma and accurately compare the findings between different areas. To circumvent this problem, exercise induced bronchospasm is often used as an objective indicator of asthma (photos courtesy of Dr Emmanuel OD Addo-Yobo, Department of Child Health, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Hygiene hypothesis within the urban-rural context

  1. Top of page
  2. Allergy in urban and rural settings
  3. Hygiene hypothesis within the urban-rural context
  4. Air pollution and allergens and rising trends in respiratory allergies
  5. Conclusions
  6. References

The Hygiene hypothesis states that environmental changes in industrialized world have lead to reduced microbial exposure in early life, which resulted in the increased prevalence of allergic sensitization and disease (26). The association between reduced exposure to infectious agent and higher prevalence of allergy seems now to be confirmed by consistent evidence. Improved hygiene has generally been associated with increasing urbanization. However, in many US inner cities increased hygiene is most certainly not the problem, and despite relatively poorer hygienic standards in comparison to the rest of the population, there appears to be a marked increase in asthma among residents in the inner-city poor neighbourhoods (27).

Furthermore, in a number of studies the increased risk for asthma in urban areas is independent of ethnicity or poverty (25). In South Africa, Steinman et al. reported that poor hygienic factors (including early exposure to farm animals) did not protect the rural Xhosa children from a dramatic increase in the prevalence of asthma and atopy over the past 20 years (28). These studies suggest that hygiene and genetic factors are not the only determinants of the increasing prevalence of asthma and atopy.

Air pollution and allergens and rising trends in respiratory allergies

  1. Top of page
  2. Allergy in urban and rural settings
  3. Hygiene hypothesis within the urban-rural context
  4. Air pollution and allergens and rising trends in respiratory allergies
  5. Conclusions
  6. References

High levels of vehicle emissions have been correlated with the increasing prevalence of respiratory allergies (29). Similarly, use of modern fuels appears to increase the risk of allergic sensitization and symptoms, and could be a significant contributing factor in the increasing prevalence of allergic disorders (30). Although the role of air pollution on the development of allergic disease is unclear, there is an increasing body of evidence suggesting that the higher levels of traffic related particles in combination with their ability to change the antigenicity of pollen may contribute to the increased prevalence and severity of allergic disease in urban areas (31).

Another recently proposed hypothesis suggests that the rising trends of allergy in urban areas may in part be explained by a decreased exposure to allergens such as pollens (caused by changes in urban lifestyle, e.g. more time spent indoors and away from areas abundant in natural allergen sources) leading to lower tolerance to pollens: ‘a reverse case of immunotherapy’ (32).

Conclusions

  1. Top of page
  2. Allergy in urban and rural settings
  3. Hygiene hypothesis within the urban-rural context
  4. Air pollution and allergens and rising trends in respiratory allergies
  5. Conclusions
  6. References

Differences in allergic disease between urban and rural areas exist and are real, but patterns vary across various phenotypes, and different causes may be responsible for the observed differences. Nevertheless, all of these studies emphasize the importance of environmental factors in the development of allergic diseases. Allergens, farming, animals and endotoxin, pets and parasites, air pollution, hygiene, infections and immunizations, breast-feeding, unpasteurized milk and diet, affluence, house construction and bedding, domestic fuel and smoking, family history and genetic variation are all pieces of the allergy puzzle. Urban-rural variability offers extreme ends of various environmental exposures, and allows a unique insight into the potential causes of increase in allergies. However, aware of the difficulties in the interpretation of data in urban-rural studies researchers in this field are becoming more specific in terms of definition of various potentially important environmental exposures, considering the poor/rich, farming/nonfarming and many other variables in an attempt to better understand the causes of the observed differences. The elucidation of mechanisms by which these environmental exposures affect not only the prevalence of sensitization and allergic disease, but also the relationship between different phenotypes (e.g. sensitization and wheeze) may help us understand the causes of the increase in allergic disease and facilitate the design of future primary prevention strategies.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Allergy in urban and rural settings
  3. Hygiene hypothesis within the urban-rural context
  4. Air pollution and allergens and rising trends in respiratory allergies
  5. Conclusions
  6. References
  • 1
    Braun-Fahrlander C, Gassner M, Grize L, Takken-Sahli K, Neu U, Stricker T et al. No further increase in asthma, hay fever and atopic sensitization in adolescents living in Switzerland. Eur Respir J 2004;23: 407413.
  • 2
    Verlato G, Corsico A, Villani S, Cerveri I, Migliore E, Accordini S et al. Is the prevalence of adult asthma and allergic rhinitis still increasing? Results of an Italian study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;111: 12321238.
  • 3
    Singh M. The burden of asthma in children: an Asian perspective. Paediatr Respir Rev 2005;6: 1419.
  • 4
    Viinanen A, Munhbayarlah S, Narantsetseg L, Zevgee T, Naidansuren T, Koskenvuo M et al. Prevalence of asthma, allergic rhinocongunctivitis and allergic sensitisation in Mongolia. Allergy 2005;60: 13701377.
  • 5
    Van Niekerk CH, Weinberg EG, Shore SC, Heese HV, Van Schalkwyk J. Prevalence of asthma: a comparative study of urban and rural Xhosa children. Clin Allergy 1979;9: 319324.
  • 6
    Ng'ang'a LW, Odhiambo JA, Mungai MW, Gicheha CM, Nderitu P, Maingi B et al. Prevalence of exercise induced bronchospasm in Kenyan school children: an urban-rural comparison. Thorax 1998;53: 919926.
  • 7
    Yemaneberhan H, Bekele Z, Venn A, Lewis S, Parry E, Britton J. Prevalence of wheeze and asthma and relation to atopy in urban and rural Ethiopia. Lancet 1997;350: 8590.
  • 8
    Addo Yobo EO, Custovic A, Taggart SC, Asafo-Agyei AP, Woodcock A. Exercise induced bronchospasm in Ghana: differences in prevalence between urban and rural schoolchildren. Thorax 1997;52: 161165.
  • 9
    Wong GW, Ko FW, Hui DS, Fok TF, Carr D, Von Mutius E et al. Factors associated with difference in prevalence of asthma in children from three cities in China: multicentre epidemiological survey. BMJ 2004;329: 486.
  • 10
    Miyamoto T. Epidemiology of pollution-induced airway disease in Japan. Allergy 1997;52: 3034.
  • 11
    Kim YK, Chang YS, Lee MH, Hong SC, Bae JM, Jee YK et al. Role of environmental exposure to spider mites in the sensitization and the clinical manifestation of asthma and rhinitis in children and adolescents living in rural and urban areas. Clin Exp Allergy 2002;32: 13051309.
  • 12
    Sudhir P, Prasad CE. Prevalence of exercise-induced bronchospasm in schoolchildren: an urban-rural comparison. J Trop Pediatr 2003;49: 104108.
  • 13
    Hijazi N, Abalkhail B, Seaton A. Diet and childhood asthma in a society in transition: a study in urban and rural Saudi Arabia. Thorax 2000;55: 775779.
  • 14
    Riedler J, Eder W, Oberfeld G, Schreuer M. Austrian children living on a farm have less hay fever, asthma and allergic sensitization. Clin Exp Allergy 2000;30: 194200.
  • 15
    Braback L, Hjern A, Rasmussen F. Trends in asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema among Swedish conscripts from farming and non-farming environments. A nationwide study over three decades. Clin Exp Allergy 2004;34: 3843.
  • 16
    Filipiak B, Heinrich J, Schafer T, Ring J, Wichmann HE. Farming, rural lifestyle and atopy in adults from southern Germany – results from the MONICA/KORA study Augsburg. Clin Exp Allergy 2001;31: 18291838.
  • 17
    Eduard W, Douwes J, Omenaas E, Heederik D. Do farming exposures cause or prevent asthma? Results from a study of adult Norwegian farmers. Thorax 2004;59: 381386.
  • 18
    Eder W, Klimecki W, Yu L, Von Mutius E, Riedler J, Braun-Fahrlander C et al. Toll-like receptor 2 as a major gene for asthma in children of European farmers. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;113: 482488.
  • 19
    Mistry R, Wickramasingha N, Ogston S, Singh M, Devasiri V, Mukhopadhyay S. Wheeze and urban variation in South Asia. Eur J Pediatr 2004;163: 145147.
  • 20
    Adler A, Tager I, Quintero DR. Decreased prevalence of asthma among farm reared children compared with those who are rural but not farm-reared. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;115: 6773.
  • 21
    Platts-Mills TA. Asthma severity and prevalence: an ongoing interaction between exposure, hygiene, and lifestyle. PLoS Med 2005;2: e34.
  • 22
    Walraven GE, Nyan OA, Van Der Sande MA, Banya WA, Ceesay SM, Milligan PJ et al. Asthma, smoking and chronic cough in rural and urban adult communities in The Gambia. Clin Exp Allergy 2001;31: 16791685.
  • 23
    Mercer MJ, Joubert G, Ehrlich RI, Nelson H, Poyser MA, Puterman A et al. Socioeconomic status and prevalence of allergic rhinitis and atopic eczema symptoms in young adolescents. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2004;15: 234241.
  • 24
    Perzanowski MS, Ng'ang'a LW, Carter MC, Odhiambo J, Ngari P, Vaughan JW et al. Atopy, asthma, and antibodies to Ascaris among rural and urban children in Kenya. J Pediatr 2002;140: 582588.
  • 25
    Aligne CA, Auinger P, Byrd RS, Weitzman M. Risk factors for pediatric asthma. Contributions of poverty, race, and urban residence. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162: 873877.
  • 26
    Platts-Mills TA, Erwin E, Heymann P, Woodfolk J. Is the hygiene hypothesis still a viable explanation for the increased prevalence of asthma? Allergy 2005;60: 2531.
  • 27
    Shapiro GG, Stout JW. Childhood asthma in the United States: urban issues. Pediatr Pulmonol 2002;33: 4755.
  • 28
    Steinman HA, Donson H, Kawalski M, Toerien A, Potter PC. Bronchial hyper-responsiveness and atopy in urban, peri-urban and rural South African children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2003;14: 383393.
  • 29
    Nicolai T, Carr D, Weiland SK, Duhme H, Von Ehrenstein O, Wagner C et al. Urban traffic and pollutant exposure related to respiratory outcomes and atopy in a large sample of children. Eur Respir J 2003;21: 956963.
  • 30
    Venn AJ, Yemaneberhan H, Bekele Z, Lewis SA, Parry E, Britton J. Increased risk of allergy associated with the use of kerosene fuel in the home. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164: 16601664.
  • 31
    Heinrich J, Wichmann HE. Traffic related pollutants in Europe and their effect on allergic disease. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;4: 341348.
  • 32
    Linneberg A. Hypothesis: urbanization and the allergy epidemic – a reverse case of immunotherapy? Allergy 2005;60: 538539.