Mycophenolate mofetil vs. azathioprine is associated with decreased acute rejection, late acute rejection, and risk for cardiovascular death in renal transplant recipients with pre-transplant diabetes
Article first published online: 14 FEB 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00338.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
David, K. M., Morris, J. A., Steffen, B. J., Chi-Burris, K. S., Gotz, V. P. and Gordon, R. D. (2005), Mycophenolate mofetil vs. azathioprine is associated with decreased acute rejection, late acute rejection, and risk for cardiovascular death in renal transplant recipients with pre-transplant diabetes. Clinical Transplantation, 19: 279–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00338.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 1 MAR 2005
- Article first published online: 14 FEB 2005
- Accepted for publication 21 December 2004
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- azathioprine;
- diabetes mellitus;
- kidney transplantation;
- mycophenolate mofetil
Abstract: Outcomes specifically in mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-treated diabetic renal transplant patients have not been previously reported. This study compared acute rejection (AR), late acute rejection (LAR), patient survival [and specifically death from cardiovascular (CV), infectious and malignant causes], incidence of post-transplant malignancies, and graft loss in MMF- or azathioprine (AZA)-treated renal transplant patients with pre-transplant diabetes. Outcomes were compared between MMF- (n = 14 144) and AZA- (n = 3001) treated diabetic patients using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data on all U.S. adult renal transplants performed between 1995 and 2002. Statistical analyses included Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, Cox multivariable regression and chi-square tests. MMF patients had less AR compared with AZA-treated patients (23.5% vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001) and less risk for LAR over 4 yr [hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% CI 0.44, 0.92; p = 0.02]. While time to any-cause death did not differ between the groups, MMF treatment was associated with a 20% decreased risk of CV death (HR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.67, 0.97; p = 0.020) compared with AZA treatment. MMF patients also had a lower incidence of malignancies than AZA patients (2.2% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). These results suggest treatment with MMF compared with treatment with AZA in diabetic transplant patients is associated with less AR, less risk of LAR, a decreased risk of CV death, and a lower incidence of malignancies.

1399-0012/asset/CTR_left.gif?v=1&s=db79646f6725f18de8963912a045605a98244bba)
