Transplant tourism – a dangerous journey?
Article first published online: 11 OCT 2010
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S
Volume 25, Issue 4, pages 633–637, July/August 2011
How to Cite
Polcari, A. J., Hugen, C. M., Farooq, A. V., Holt, D. R., Hou, S. H. and Milner, J. E. (2011), Transplant tourism – a dangerous journey?. Clinical Transplantation, 25: 633–637. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01325.x
- Issue published online: 16 AUG 2011
- Article first published online: 11 OCT 2010
- Accepted for publication 15 June 2010
Polcari AJ, Hugen CM, Farooq AV, Holt DR, Hou SH, Milner JE. Transplant tourism – a dangerous journey? Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 633–637. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Abstract: Introduction: While the ethical aspects of transplant tourism have received much attention recently, less has been written about the medical safety of this practice. We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of patients who purchased organs internationally and presented to our center for follow-up care.
Methods: Baseline demographic characteristics were recorded. Post-operative outcomes including patient survival, graft survival, five-yr graft function, and complications were assessed.
Results: Eight patients who purchased international organs for transplant were identified. The country of transplant was China (n = 3), Pakistan (n = 3), India (n = 1), and the Philippines (n = 1). All patients were born in either Asia or the Middle East and traveled to the region of their ethnicity for transplantation. The mean time to presentation was 49 d post-operatively. The overall one- and two-yr patient survival rates were 87% and 75%, respectively. One patient died of miliary tuberculosis and another of Acinetobacter baumanii sepsis. There was one case of newly acquired hepatitis B infection. At last follow-up, all six surviving patients had functioning grafts with a mean creatinine level of 1.26 mg/dL at five yr.
Conclusion: Although intermediate-term graft function is acceptable, the early morbidity and mortality among transplant tourists is high. These results suggest that the associated risks may not justify the trip.