The authors of this paper do not have any commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with this manuscript.
Burden and marital and sexual satisfaction in the partners of bipolar patients
Article first published online: 20 SEP 2005
Volume 7, Issue 5, pages 431–440, October 2005
How to Cite
Lam, D., Donaldson, C., Brown, Y. and Malliaris, Y. (2005), Burden and marital and sexual satisfaction in the partners of bipolar patients. Bipolar Disorders, 7: 431–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2005.00240.x
- Issue published online: 20 SEP 2005
- Article first published online: 20 SEP 2005
- Received 7 October 2004, revised and accepted for publication 6 June 2005
- bipolar disorder;
- marital satisfaction;
- sexual satisfaction
Objectives: Bipolar disorder can be traumatic for both patients and patients’ partners. Hence, partners’ stress, burden, marital and sexual satisfactions are important areas to investigate. However, there have been problems with past attempts to identify the determinants of marital satisfaction in bipolar patients and their partners. The present study aimed to address these issues and provide an accurate description of relationship functioning in these couples.
Methods: The sample involved 37 partners of bipolar patients. A semi-structured interview assessed the impact of bipolar disorder on aspects of everyday functioning and partners’ attributions for patients’ disturbing behaviour. Standardized instruments assessed partners’ sexual and marital satisfaction across the different affective states.
Results: Despite couples staying together, significant numbers of partners reported strain as a result of socioeconomic and household changes. More male partners reported premature ejaculation and female partners reported sexual infrequency when patients were depressed. Overall, partners were less sexually satisfied when the patient was ill. Marital disharmony was greater when patients were ill and worse during manic than depressed phases. Marital disharmony was also more likely when partners believed the patient could control their illness; they had increased domestic responsibilities; or were sexually dissatisfied.
Conclusion: Reductions in sexual satisfaction during affective episodes may be the result of illness-related changes in sexual interest, responsiveness and affection. Partners who attribute control for the illness to the patient may use strategies to influence behaviour that disrupt marital harmony. Interventions involving education, problem-solving strategies and sex therapy components may help to reduce marital dissatisfaction.