SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Do QB, Goyer C, Chavanon O, Couture P, Denautt A, Cartier R. Hemodynamic changes during off-pump CABG surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21: 38590.
  • 2
    Fiore G, Latrofa ME, Tunzi P, Traversa M, Fondacone C, Marraudino N et al. Hemodynamics in off-pump surgery: normal versus compromised preoperative left ventricular function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27: 48893.
  • 3
    Mishra M, Malhotra R, Mishra A, Meharwal ZS, Trehan N. Hemodynamic changes during displacement of the beating heart using epicardial stabilization for off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002; 16: 68590.
  • 4
    Lefrant JY, Bruelle P, Ripart J, Ibanez F, Aya G, Peray P et al. Cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients: comparison of continuous and conventional thermodilution techniques. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42: 9726.
  • 5
    Sakka SG, Reinhart K, Wegscheider K, Meier-Hellmann A. Is the placement of a pulmonary artery catheter still justified solely for the measurement of cardiac output? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000; 14: 11924.
  • 6
    Aranda M, Mihm FG, Garrett S, Mihm MN. Pearl RG. Continuous cardiac output catheters: delay in in vitro response time after controlled flow changes. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 15925.
  • 7
    Siegel LC, Hennessy MM, Pearl RG. Delayed time response of the continuous cardiac output pulmonary artery catheter. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 11737.
  • 8
    Buhre W, Weyland A, Kazmaier S, Hanekop GG, Baryalei MM, Sydow M et al. Comparison of cardiac output assessed by pulse-contour analysis and thermodilution in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 13: 43740.
  • 9
    Godje O, Thiel C, Lamm P, Schmitz C, Thiel C, Weinert M et al. Less invasive, continuous hemodynamic monitoring during minimally invasive coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 15326.
  • 10
    Della Rocca RG, Costa MG, Pompei L, Coccia C, Pietropaoli P et al. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 3506.
  • 11
    Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Eltzschig HK, Bayerlein J, Goetz AE. Cardiac index measurements during rapid preload changes: a comparison of pulmonary artery thermodilution with arterial pulse contour analysis. J Clin Anesth 2005; 17: 2418.
  • 12
    Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Faltchauser A, Lamm P, Reichart B. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 240712.
  • 13
    Jellema WT, Wesseling KH, Groeneveld AB, Stoutenbeek CP, Thijs LG, Van Lieshout JJ. Continuous cardiac output in septic shock by simulating a model of the aortic input impedance: a comparison with bolus injection thermodilution. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 131728.
  • 14
    Rauch H, Muller M, Fleischer F, Bauer H, Martin E, Bottiger BW. Pulse contour analysis versus thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46: 4249.
  • 15
    Wesseling KH, Jansen JR, Settels JJ, Schreuder JJ. Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74: 256673.
  • 16
    Rodig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, Liebold A, Hobbhahn J. Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vs. thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 52530.
  • 17
    Tannenbaum GA, Mathews D, Weissman C. Pulse contour cardiac-output in surgical intensive-care unit patients. J Clin Anesth 1993; 5: 4718.
  • 18
    Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Eltzschig HK, Moerstedt K, Goedje O, Goetz AE. Comparison of pulmonary arterial thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis: Evaluation of a new algorithm. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 296301.
  • 19
    Godje O, Hoke K, Goetz AE, Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Reichart B et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 528.
  • 20
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 30710.
  • 21
    Mantha S, Roizen MF, Fleisher LA, Thisted R, Foss J. Comparing methods of clinical measurement: reporting standards for bland and altman analysis. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 593602.
  • 22
    Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15: 8591.
  • 23
    Edgerton JR, Dewey TM, Magee MJ, Herbert MA, Prince SL, Jones KK et al. Conversion in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of predictors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 113842.
  • 24
    Mahajan A, Shabanie A, Turner J, Sopher MJ, Marijic J. Pulse contour analysis for cardiac output monitoring in cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 12838.