You have free access to this content

Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation

  1. A. Perner*,
  2. T. Faber

Article first published online: 25 AUG 2006

DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01120.x

Issue

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volume 50, Issue 9, pages 1068–1073, October 2006

Additional Information

How to Cite

Perner, A. and Faber, T. (2006), Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 50: 1068–1073. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01120.x

Author Information

  1. 1Department of Anaesthesia, Rigshospitalet and 2Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

*Anders Perner Department of Intensive Care 4131 Rigshospitalet Blegdamsvej DK-2100 Copenhagen Denmark e-mail: ap@dadlnet.dk

  1. This study was presented in part at the 18th Annual Congress of the European Society of Intensive Care in Amsterdam 2005.

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 25 AUG 2006
  2. Article first published online: 25 AUG 2006
  3. Accepted for publication 15 May 2006

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (142K)

References

  • 1
    Bendjelid K, Romand JA. Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 352–60.
  • 2
    Pinsky MR. Assessment of indices of preload and volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11: 235–9.
  • 3
    Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, Swaraj S, Cowan C, Mostafa SM et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21: 132–8.
  • 4
    Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, Friedman Z, Segal E, Villa Y et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 984–9.
  • 5
    Wiesenack C, Prasser C, Rodig G, Keyl C. Stroke volume variation as an indicator of fluid responsiveness using pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1254–7.
  • 6
    Hofer CK, Müller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128: 848–54.
  • 7
    Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Kilger E, Schmidt C, Lamm P, Goetz AE. Optimizing fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations. Comparison with aortic systolic pressure variations. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 124–6.
  • 8
    Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, Kilger E, Goedje O, Lamm P et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 392–8.
  • 9
    Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, Prasser C, Keyl C. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 658–65.
  • 10
    Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 746–55.
  • 11
    American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 864–74.
  • 12
    Devlin JW, Boleski G, Mlynarek M, Nerenz DR, Peterson E, Jankowski M et al. Motor Activity Assessment Scale: a valid and reliable sedation scale for use with mechanically ventilated patients in an adult surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 1271–5.
  • 13
    Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De MA, Bruining H et al. The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22: 707–10.
  • 14
    Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, Bahloul M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest 2003; 124: 1900–8.
  • 15
    Nouira S, Elatrous S, Dimassi S, Besbes L, Boukef R, Mohamed B et al. Effects of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2339–43.
  • 16
    Pinsky MR. The dynamic interface between hemodynamic variables and autonomic tone. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2437–8.
  • 17
    Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313–21.
  • 18
    Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134–8.
  • 19
    De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal Volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517–23.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (142K)