• Caesarean section;
  • pre-caesarean section;
  • prediction;
  • pain threshold;
  • electrical pain threshold;
  • pre-operative pain;
  • post-operative pain;
  • PainMatcher;
  • visual analogue scale

Background:  Treatment of post-operative pain is still a significant problem. Recently, interest has focused on pre-operative identification of patients who may experience severe post-operative pain in order to offer a more aggressive analgesic treatment. The nociceptive stimulation methods have included heat injury and pressure algometry. A simple method, Pain Matcher® (PM), using electrical stimulation, is validated for pain assessment, but has not been evaluated as a tool for prediction of post-operative pain. Our aim was to assess the predictive value of pre-caesarean section pain threshold on intensity of post-caesarean section pain using the PM.

Patients and methods:  Thirty-nine healthy women scheduled for elective caesarean section were studied. The anaesthetic/analgesic procedures included spinal anaesthesia, paracetamol, diclofenac, controlled-release (CR) oxycodone and morphine on request. Pre-operatively, the sensory and pain thresholds were measured using the PM. Post-operatively, a midwife, blinded for pre-caesarean pain threshold assessments, assessed the pain at rest and during mobilization every 12 h for 2 days. Consumption of analgesics was also recorded.

Results:  Pre-operative pain threshold correlated significantly with post-caesarean pain score (VAS) at rest and mobilization: [Spearman’s rho =–0.65 (–0.30 to –0.75), P < 0.01] and [Spearman’s rho =–0.52 (–0.23 to –0.72), P < 0.01], respectively. There was no significant correlation between pre-operative PM assessment of sensory threshold and post-operative pain.

Conclusion:  Electrical pain threshold before caesarean section seems to predict the intensity of post-operative pain. This method may be used as a screening tool to identify patients at high risk of post-operative pain.