SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Blomberg, S.P., Garland, T., Jr & Ives, A.R. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 0: 717745.
  • Burt, A. 1989. Comparative methods using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 6: 3353.
  • Charnov, E.L. 1993. Life History Invariants. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Enquist, B.J., West, G.B., Charnov, E.L. & Brown, J.H. 1999. Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants. Nature 401: 907911.
  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 115.
  • Freckleton, R.P. 2000. Phylogenetic tests of ecological and evolutionary hypotheses: checking for phylogenetic independence. Funct. Ecol. 14: 129134.
  • Freckleton, R.P., Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160: 712726.
  • Garland, T., Jr & Ives, A.R. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155: 346364.
  • Garland, T., Jr, Harvey, P.H. & Ives, A.R. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41: 1832.
  • Garland, T., Jr, Midford, P.E. & Ives, A.R. 1999. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral states. Am. Zool. 39: 374388.
  • Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 326: 119157.
  • Grafen, A. 1992. The uniqueness of the phylogenetic regression. J. Theor. Biol. 156: 405423.
  • Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M.D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Hendriks, A.J. 1999. Allometric scaling of rate, age and density parameters in ecological models. Oikos 86: 293310.
  • Holdaway, R.N. 1994. An exploratory phylogenetic analysis of the genera in the Accipitridae, with notes on the biogeography of the family. In: Raptor Conservation Today (B. U.Meyburg & R. D.Chancellor, eds), pp. 601647. Pica Press, Berlin.
  • Ihaka, R. & Gentleman, R. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comp. Graph. Stat. 5: 299314.
  • Jones, K.E. & Purvis, A. 1997. An optimum body size for mammals? Comparative evidence from bats. Funct. Ecol. 11: 751756.
  • Krüger, O. 2000. Correlates of population density and body weight of raptors in the family Accipitridae: a comparative study. J. Zool. Lond. 250: 185191.
  • Martins, E.P. 2000. Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 296299.
  • Martins, E.P. 2001. COMPARE, Ver. 4.4. Computer programs for the statistical analysis of comparative data. http://compare.bio.indiana.edu/
  • Martins, E.P. & Hansen, T.F. 1996. The statistical analysis of interspecific data: a review and evaluation of phylogenetic comparative methods. In: Phylogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behavior (E. P.Martins, ed.), pp. 2275. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Martins, E.P. & Hansen, T.F. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149: 646667.
  • Martins, E.P., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. & Housworth, E.A. 2002. Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative method: a computer simulation test. Evolution 56: 113.
  • Paradis, E. & Claude, J. 2002. Analysis of comparative data using generalized estimating equations. J. Theor. Biol. 218: 175185.
  • Paradis, E., Strimmer, K., Claude, J., Noel, Y. & Bolker, B. 2002. ape: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution. http://www.cran.r-project.org/
  • Pinheiro, J.C. & Bates, D.M. 2000. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York.
  • Purvis, A. & Rambaut, A. 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 11: 247251.
  • Rohlf, F.J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55: 21432160.
  • Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman, New York.
  • Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.