SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Amos, W. 1999. A comparative approach to the study of microsatellite evolution. In: Microsatellites Evolution and Applications (D. B.Goldstein & C.Schlötterer, eds), pp. 68.Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Antonovics, J., Stratton, D., Thrall, P.H. & Jarosz, A.M. 1996. An anther-smut disease (Ustilago violacea) of fire-pink (Silene virginica): Its biology and relationship to the anther-smut disease of white campion (Silene alba). Am. Midl. Nat. 135: 130143.
  • Audran, J.-C. & Batcho, M. 1981. Microsporogenesis and pollen grains in Silene dioica (L.) Cl. and alterations in its anthers parasitised by Ustilago violacea (Pers.) Rouss. (Ustilaginales). Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 50: 2932.
  • Baird, M.L. & Garber, E.D. 1979. Genetics of Ustilago violacea. V. Outcrossing and selfing in teliospore inoculation. Bot. Gaz. 140: 8993.
  • Baker, H.G. 1947. Infection of species of Melandrium by Ustilago violacea (Pers.) Fuckel and the transmission of the resultant disease. Ann. Bot. 11: 333348.
  • Baker, H.G. 1948. Stages in invasion and replacement demonstrated by species of Melandrium. J. Ecol. 36: 96119.
  • Baker, H.G. 1951. The inheritance of certain characters in crosses between Melandrium dioicum and M. album. Genetica 25: 126156.
  • Biere, A. & Honders, S. 1996a. Host adaptation in the anther smut fungus Ustilago violacea (Microbotryum violaceum): Infection success, spore production and alteration of floral traits on two host species and their F1-hybrid. Oecologia 107: 307320.
  • Biere, A. & Honders, S. 1996b. Impact of flowering phenology of Silene alba and S. dioica on susceptibility to fungal infection and seed predation. Oikos 77: 467480.
  • Biere, A. & Honders, S. 1998. Anther smut transmission in Silene latifolia and Silene dioica: Impact of host traits, disease frequency, and host density. Int. J. Plant Sci. 159: 228235.
  • Bucheli, E., Gautschi, B. & Shykoff, J.A. 1998. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in the anther smut fungus Microbotryum violaceum. Mol. Ecol. 7: 665666.
  • Bucheli, E., Gautschi, B. & Shykoff, J.A. 2000. Host-specific differentiation in the anther smut fungus Microbotryum violaceum as revealed by microsatellites. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 188198.
  • Bucheli, E., Gautschi, B. & Shykoff, J.A. 2001. Differences in population structure of the anther smut fungus Microbotryum violaceum on two closely related host species, Silene latifolia and S. dioica. Mol. Ecol. 10: 285294.
    Direct Link:
  • Cummins, J.E. & Day, A.W. 1977. Genetic and cell cycle analysis of a smut fungus (Ustilago violacea). In: Methods Cell Biol (D.M.Prescott, ed), pp. 445469. Academic Press, New York.
  • Day, A.W. 1980. Competition and distribution studies of genetically marked strains of Ustilago violacea in the same host plant. Bot. Gaz. 141: 313320.
  • Deml, G. & Oberwinkler, F. 1982. Studies in Heterobasidiomycetes. Part 24. On Ustilago violacea (Pers.) Rouss. from Saponaria officinalis L. Phytopath. Zeitschr. 104: 345356.
  • El Mousadik, A. & Petit, R.J. 1996. High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree Argania spinosa (L) Skeels endemic to Morocco. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 832839.
  • Freeman, A.B., Duong, K.K., Shi, T.L., Hughes, C.F. & Perlin, M.H. 2002. Isolates of Microbotryum violaceum from North American host species are phylogenetically distinct from their European host- derived counterparts. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 23: 158170.
  • Garber, E.D. & Owens, A.E. 1980. Genetics of Ustilago violacea VI. Characterization of white and yellow strains by recombination and complementation. Bot. Gaz. 141: 7984.
  • Garber, E.D., Baird, M.L. & Chapman, D.J. 1975. Genetics of Ustilago violacea I. Carotenoid mutants and carotenogenesis. Bot. Gaz. 136: 341346.
  • Goodman, S.J. 1997. R-ST Calc: a collection of computer programs for calculating estimates of genetic differentiation from microsatellite data and determining their significance. Mol. Ecol. 6: 881885.
  • Gotoh, T., Bruin, J., Sabelis, M.W. & Menken, S.B.J. 1993. Host race formation in Tetranychus urticae: Genetic differentiation, host-plant preference, and mate choice in a tomato and a cucumber strain. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 68: 171178.
  • Goudet, J. 1995. FSTAT (Version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86: 485486.
  • Goulson, D. & Jerrim, K. 1997. Maintenance of the species boundary between Silene dioica and S. latifolia (red and white campion). Oikos 79: 115126.
  • Hood, M.E. 2003. Dynamics of multiple infection and within-host competition by the anther-smut pathogen. Am. Nat. 162: 122133.
  • Hood, M.E. & Antonovics, J. 1998. Two-celled promycelia and mating-type segregation inUstilago violacea (Microbotryum violaceum). Int. J. Plant Sci. 159: 199205.
  • Hood, M.E. & Antonovics, J. 2000. Intratetrad mating, heterozygosity, and the maintenance of deleterious alleles in Microbotryum violaceum (= Ustilago violacea). Heredity. 85: 231241.
  • Hood, M.E. & Antonovics, J. 2004. Mating within the meiotic tetrad and the maintenance of genomic heterozygosity. Genetics 166: 17511759.
  • Jennersten, O. 1983. Butterfly visitors as vectors of Ustilago violacea spores between caryophyllaceous plants. Oikos 40: 125130.
  • Kaltz, O. & Shykoff, J.A. 1997. Sporidial mating-type ratios of teliospores from natural populations of the anther smut fungus Microbotryum (equals Ustilago) violaceum. Int. J. Plant Sci. 158: 575584.
  • Kaltz, O. & Shykoff, J.A. 1999. Selfing versus outcrossing propensity of the fungal pathogen Microbotryum violaceum across Silene latifolia host plants. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 340349.
  • Kimura, M. 1955. Solution of a process of random genetic drift with a continuous model. PNAS 41: 144150.
  • Kimura, M. & Ohta, T. 1978. Stepwise mutation model and distribution of allelic frequencies in a finite population. PNAS 75: 28682872.
  • Lewis, P.O. & Zaykin, D. 2001. Genetic Data Analysis: Computer Program for the Analysis of Allelic Data. Version 1.0 (d16c). Free program distributed over the internet from http://lewis.eeb.uconn.edu/lewishome/software.html.
  • Merilä, J. & Crnokrak, P. 2001. Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 892903.
  • Michalakis, Y. & Excoffier, L. 1996. A generic estimation of population subdivision using distances between alleles with special reference for microsatellite loci. Genetics 142: 10611064.
  • Nei, M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Oudemans, P.V., Alexander, H.M., Antonovics, J., Altizer, S., Thrall, P.H. & Rose, L. 1998. The distribution of mating-type bias in natural populations of the anther-smut Ustilago violacea on Silene alba in Virginia. Mycologia 90: 372381.
  • Peever, T.L., Canihos, Y., Olsen, L., Ibanez, A., Liu, Y.C. & Timmer, L.W. 1999. Population genetic structure and host specificity of Alternaria spp. causing brown spot of Minneola tangelo and rough lemon in Florida. Phytopathology 89: 851860.
  • Peever, T.L., Olsen, L., Ibanez, A. & Timmer, L.W. 2000. Genetic differentiation and host specificity among populations of Alternaria spp. causing brown spot of grapefruit and tangerine × grapefruit hybrids in Florida. Phytopathology 90: 407414.
  • Pemberton, J.M., Slate, J., Bancroft, D.R. & Barrett, J.A. 1995. Nonamplifying alleles at microsatellite loci: a caution for parentage and population studies. Mol. Ecol. 4: 249252.
  • Perlin, M.H. 1996. Pathovars or formae speciales of Microbotryum violaceum differ in electrophoretic karyotype. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157: 447452.
  • Perlin, M.H., Hughes, C., Welch, J., Akkaraju, S., Steinecker, D., Kumar, A., Smith, B., Garr, S.S., Brown, S.A. & Andom, T. 1997. Molecular approaches to differentiate subpopulations or formae speciales of the fungal phytopathogen Microbotryum violaceum. Int. J. Plant Sci. 158: 568574.
  • Rice, W.R. & Salt, G.W. 1990. The evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character under sympatric conditions: experimental evidence. Evolution 44: 11401152.
  • Scutt, C.P., Li, Y., Robertson, S.E., Willis, M.E. & Gilmartin, P.M. 1997. Sex determination in dioecious Silene latifolia - Effects of the Y chromosome and the parasitic smut fungus (Ustilago violacea) on gene expression during flower development. Plant Physiol. 114: 969979.
  • Shykoff, J.A., Meyhofer, A. & Bucheli, E. 1999. Genetic isolation among host races of the anther smut fungus Microbotryum violaceum on three host plant species. Int. J. Plant Sci. 160: 907916.
  • Slatkin, M. 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139: 457462.
  • Su, G., Suh, S.O., Schneider, R.W. & Russin, J.S. 2001. Host specialization in the charcoal rot fungus, Macrophomina phaseolina. Phytopathology 91: 120126.
  • Swofford, D.L. & Selander, R.B. 1987. Biosys-I, a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematic analysis of allelic variation in genetics. User's manual. J. Hered. 72: 281283.
  • Van Putten, W.F. 2002. On Host Race Differentiation in Smut Fungi. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Van Putten, W.F., Biere, A. & Van Damme, J.M.M. 2003. Intraspecific competition and mating between fungal strains of the anther smut Microbotryum violaceum from the host plants Silene latifolia and S. dioica. Evolution 57: 766776.
  • Weir, B.S. & Cockerham, C.C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 13581370.
  • Will, O.H., Ruddat, M. & Garber, E.D. 1984. Characterization of cytochrome c accumulation in white and pink strains of Ustilago violacea using low-temperature spectroscopy and amino acid analysis. Curr. Microbiol. 10: 16.
  • Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97159.
  • Wyttenbach, A., Narain, Y. & Fredga, K. 1999. Genetic structuring and gene flow in a hybrid zone between two chromosome races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus, Insectivora) revealed by microsatellites. Heredity 82: 7988.
  • Zillig, H. 1921. Über spezialisierte Formen beim Antherenbrand, Ustilago violacea (Pers.) Fuck. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenk. 53: 3374.