The evolution of repeated mating under sexual conflict
Article first published online: 4 APR 2005
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 18, Issue 1, pages 106–115, January 2005
How to Cite
Härdling, R. and Kaitala, A. (2005), The evolution of repeated mating under sexual conflict. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18: 106–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00795.x
- Issue published online: 4 APR 2005
- Article first published online: 4 APR 2005
- Received 4 June 2004; revised 9 June 2004; accepted 9 June 2004
- 2001. Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 399–405. &
- 1989. Multiple mating in a water strider: mutual benefits or intersexual conflict? Anim. Behav. 38: 749–756.
- 1997. The evolution of water strider mating systems: causes and consequences of sexual conflicts. In: The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (J. C.Choe & B. J.Crespi, eds), pp. 146–163. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
- 1998. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393: 784–786.
- 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60: 145–164. &
- 2002a. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56: 936–947. &
- 2002b. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415: 787–789. &
- 1999. Experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite loads and fitness in a bumble-bee. Nature 397: 151–154. &
- 2001. Unexpected consequences of polyandry for parasites and fitness in the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris. Evolution 55: 1639–1643. &
- 2003. Reproductive conflicts in social animals: who has power? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 277–282. , &
- 2001. Intraspecific variation and intersexual correlation in secondary sexual characters of three diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73: 221–232. , &
- 1993. repeated matings offset costs of reproduction in female crickets. Evol. Ecol. 7: 240–250. &
- 2003. Sexual conflict and indirect benefits. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 1055–1060. , &
- 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373: 241–244. , , , &
- 2003a. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 41–47. , , &
- 2003b. The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: Female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 9923–9928. , , , , , , &
- 1997. The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge University press, Cambridge, UK. &
- 2003. Shall we dance or shall we fight? Using DNA sequence data to untangle controversies surrounding sexual selection. Genome 46: 925–926.
- 2000. Correlated effects of sperm competition and postmating female mortality. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 13162–13165. &
- 1978. The cost of mating. Am. Nat. 112: 771–774.
- 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton, New York.
- 1995. Sexual selection by cryptic female choice on male seminal products: a new bridge between sexual selection and reproductive physiology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 493–496. &
- 2002. Nuptial gifts and the evolution of male body size. Evolution 56: 590–596. &
- 2003. Fitness effects of female mate choice: preferred males are detrimental for Drosophila melanogaster females. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 797–811. &
- 2002. Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 2309–2316. , , &
- 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403: 886–889.
- 2002. Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 10533–10538. &
- 2000. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 531–539. , &
- 1984. Sperm dependence of female receptivity to remating in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38: 1273–1282. , &
- 2001. Resolutions of evolutionary conflicts: costly behaviours enforce the evolution of cost-free compromises. Evol. Ecol. Res. 7: 759–876. , , &
- 1991. Pre-mating sperm removal in the bush cricket Metaplastes ornatus Ramme 1931 (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea, Poecilimon). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 391–396. &
- 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 5083–5088. &
- 2001. Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr. Biol. 11: 489–493. , &
- 1999. Models of Adaptive Behaviour. Cambridge University press, Cambridge. &
- 1995. Sexually transmitted disease in a promiscusous insect, Adalia bipunctata. Ecol. Entomol. 20: 230–236. , , , , , &
- 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75: 21–64. &
- 1996. Oviposition on the back of conspecifics: an unusual reproductive tactic in a coreid bug. Oikos 77: 381–389.
- 2001. Sexual interactions and conspecific exploitation in an egg-carrying bug. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 38: 215–221. &
- 1998. Nuptial gifts, resource budgets, and reproductive output in a polyandrous butterfly. Ecology 79: 2931–2940.
- 2003. Female Reproduction and Conspecific Utilisation in an Egg-carrying Bug – Who Carries, Who Cares, PhD thesis. University of Oulu, Oulu.
- 2003. Conspecifics enhance egg production in an egg-carrying bug. Behav. Ecol. 14: 897–901. &
- 2000. Sperm depletion and mating behavior in the parasitoid wasp Spalangia cameroni (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Great Lakes Entomol. 33: 117–127.
- 1997. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 1282–1286. &
- 1991. Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 183–186.
- 2003. The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423: 979–982. &
- 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University press, Cambridge.
- 1999. The cost of sexual coercion and heterospecific sexual harassment on the fecundity of a host-specific, seed-eating insect (Neacoryphus bicrucis). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46: 164–170. &
- 2003. Females avoid manipulative males and live longer. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 523–530. , &
- 2002. Patterns of divergence in the effects of mating on female reproductive performance in flour beetles. Evolution 56: 111–120. , &
- 1986. Variation in laboratory oviposition by Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae) in relation to mating status. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79: 705–710. &
- 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45: 525–568.
- 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (M. S.Blum & N. A.Blum eds), pp. 123–166. Academic press, New York.
- 1998. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 261–274. &
- 2003. Reducing a cost of traumatic insemination: female bedbugs evolve a unique organ. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 2371–2375. , &
- 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381: 232–234.
- 1998. Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (D. J.Howard & S. H.Berlocher eds), pp. 261–270. Oxford University press, New York, NY, USA.
- 1997. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE) and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 1–10. &
- 1988. Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol. Rev. 63: 509–549.
- 2002. Fitness advantage from nuptial gifts in female fireflies. Ecol. Entomol. 27: 373–377. &
- 1992. Convenience polyandry in a water strider: foraging conflicts and female control of copulation frequency and guarding duration. Anim. Behav. 44: 189–202.
- 2002. Sexually antagonistic coevolution in a mating syste: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes. Evolution 56: 754–767. &
- 1994. Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends. Ecol. Evol 9: 289–293. , , &
- 2001. Males of social insects can prevent queens from multiple mating. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 1449–1454. , , &
- 2000. Female mating frequencies in Bombus spp. from central Europe. Insect. Soc. 47: 36–41. &
- 2003. Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton University press, Princeton, NJ, USA. &
- 1997. Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 154–159.
- 1997. Fitness costs of female reproduction. Evolution 51: 1323–1326. &
- 2003. Do male golden egg bugs carry eggs they have fertilized? A microsatellite study. Behav. Ecol. 4: 481–485. , &
- 1983. The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University press, Cambridge, MA, USA. &
- 1998. The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 73: 43–78.
- 1992. Sexual conflict in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Funct. Ecol. 6: 649–653. , &
- 2003. Paternal investment directly affects female reproductive effort in an insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 2065–2071. &
- 1994. Conflicts of interest between the sexes: a study of mating interactions in a semiaquatic bug. Anim. Behav. 48: 893–901. &
- 1993. Polyandry and its effect on female reproduction in the green-veined white butterfly (Pieris napi). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33: 25–33. , , &
- 1988. Cost of mating for female insects: risk of predation in Photinus collustrans (Coleoptera, Lampyridae). Am. Nat. 131: 139–142.
- 2003. Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility. Ethology. 109: 929–950. &