SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Azevedo, R.B.R., French, V. & Partridge, L. 1997. Life-history consequences of egg size in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 150: 250282.
  • Badyaev, A.V., Hill, G.E., Beck, M.L., Dervan, A.A., Duckworth, R.A., McGraw, K.J., Nolan, P.M. & Whittingham, L.A. 2002. Sex-biased hatching order and adaptive population divergence in a passerine bird. Science 295: 316318.
  • Baskin, C.C. & Baskin, J.M. 1998. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Bernardo, J. 1996. The particular maternal effect of propagule size, especially egg size: patterns, models, quality of evidence and interpretations. Am. Zool. 36: 216236.
  • Byers, D.L., Plantenkamp, G.A.J. & Shaw, R.G. 1997. Variation in seed characters in Nemophila menziesii: evidence of a genetic basis for maternal effect. Evolution 51: 14451456.
  • Cohen, D. 1968. A general model of optimal reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J. Ecol. 56: 219228.
  • Coulson, T., Kruuk, L.E.B., Tavecchia, G., Pemberton, J.M. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2003. Estimating selection on neonatal traits in red deer using elasticity path analysis. Evolution 57: 28792892.
  • Dolan, R.W. 1984. The effect of seed size and maternal source on individual size in a population of Ludwigia leptocarpa (Onagraceae). Am. J. Bot. 71: 13021307.
  • Donohue, K. & Schmitt, J. 1999. The genetic architecture of plasticity to density in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 53: 13771386.
  • Endler, J. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • Fox, C.W., Waddell, K.J. & Mousseau, T.A. 1995. Parental host plant affects offspring life-histories in a seed beetle. Ecology 76: 402411.
  • Fox, C.W., Thakar, M.S. & Mousseau, T.A. 1997. Egg size plasticity in a seed beetle: an adaptive maternal effect. Am. Nat. 149: 149163.
  • Gomez, J.M. 2004. Bigger is not always better: conflicting selective pressures on seed size in Quercus ilex. Evolution 58: 7180.
  • Hunt, J. & Simmons, L.W. 2002. The genetics of maternal care: direct and indirect genetic effects on phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 68286832.
  • Jordan, N. 1992. Path analysis of local adaptation in two ecotypes of the annual plant Diodia teres Walt. (Rubiaceae). Am. Nat. 140: 149165.
  • Kalisz, S. 1986. Variable selection on the timing of germination in collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 40: 479491.
  • Kearney, T.H. & Peebles, R.H. 1964. Arizona Flora. University of California Press, Los Angeles.
  • Kelly, C.A. 1992. Spatial and temporal variation in selection on correlated life-history traits and plant size in Chamaecrista fasciculata. Evolution 46: 16581673.
  • Kingsolver, J.G., Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hill, C.E., Hoang, A., Gibert, P. & Beerli, P. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157: 245261.
  • Kirkpatrick, M. & Lande, R. 1989. The evolution of maternal characters. Evolution 43: 485503.
  • Lacey, E.P. 1998. What is an adaptively induced parental effect? In: Maternal Effects as Adaptations (T. A.Mousseau & C. W.Fox, eds), pp. 5466. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Latta, R.G. & Mitton, J.B. 1999. Historical separation and present gene flow through a zone of secondary contact in ponderosa pine. Evolution 53: 769776.
  • Loveless, M.D. & Hamrick, J.L. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 6595.
  • Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Inc., Sunderland.
  • Mazer, S.J. 1987. Parental effects on seed development and seed yield in Raphanus raphanistrum: implications for natural and sexual selection. Evolution 41: 355371.
  • Mazer, S.J. & Wolfe, L.M. 1992. Planting density influences the expression of genetic variation in seed mass in wild radish (Raphinus sativus L.: Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79: 11851193.
  • McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J.A. 1989. Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
  • Miao, S.L., Bazzaz, F.A. & Primack, R.B. 1991. Persistence of maternal nutrient effects in Plantago major– the third generation. Ecology 72: 16341642.
  • Montalvo, A.M. & Shaw, R.G. 1994. Quantitative genetics of sequential life-history and juvenile traits in the partially selfing perennial, Aquilegia caerulea. Evolution 48: 828841.
  • Mousseau, T.A. 1991. Geographic variation in maternal-age effects on diapause in a cricket. Evolution 45: 10531059.
  • Mousseau, T.A. & Dingle, H. 1991. Maternal effects in insects: examples, constraints, and geographic variation. In: The Unity of Evolutionary Biology: Proceedings of the ICSEB IV Meeting (E. C.Dudley, ed.), pp. 745761. Dioscordes Press, Portland.
  • Mousseau, T.A. & Fox, C.W. 1998. Maternal Effects as Adaptations. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Platenkamp, G.A.J. & Shaw, R.G. 1993. Environmental and genetic maternal effects on seed characters in Nemophila menziesii. Evolution 47: 540555.
  • Roach, D.A. & Wulff, R.D. 1987. Maternal effects in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 209235.
  • Rossiter, M.C. 1991. Maternal effects generate variation in life history: consequences of egg weight plasticity in the gypsy moth. Funct. Ecol. 5: 386393.
  • Rossiter, M.C. 1996. Incidence and consequences of inherited environmental effects. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 451476.
  • Rossiter, M.C. 1998. The role of environmental variation in parental effects expression. In: Maternal Effects as Adaptations (T. A.Mousseau & C. W.Fox, eds), pp. 112134. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • SAS Institute, 1999. SAS Procedures Guide, Version 8. SAS Institute Cary, NC, USA.
  • Schaal, B.A. 1980. Reproductive capacity and seed size in Lupinus texensis. Am. J. Bot. 67: 703709.
  • Schmid, B. & Dolt, C. 1994. Effects of maternal and paternal environment and genotype on offspring phenotype in Solidalgo altissima L. Evolution 48: 15251549.
  • Schmitt, J., Niles, J. & Wulff, R.D. 1992. Norms of reaction of seed traits to maternal environments in Plantago lanceolata. Am. Nat. 139: 451466.
  • Stratton, D.A. 1989. Competition prolongs expression of maternal effects in seedlings of Erigeron annus (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 76: 16461653.
  • van Tienderen, P.H. 2000. Elasticities and the link between demographic and evolutionary dynamics. Ecology 81: 666679.
  • Weinig, C. 2000. Plasticity versus canalization: population differences in the timing of shade-avoidance responses. Evolution 54: 441451.
  • Weller, S.G. 1985. Establishment of Lithospermum caroliniense on sand dunes: the role of nutlet mass. Ecology 66: 18931901.
  • Winn, A.A. 1988. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of seed size in Prunella vulgaris. Ecology 69: 15371544.
  • Winn, A.A. & Evans, A.S. 1991. Variation among populations of Prunella vulgaris L. in plastic responses to light. Funct. Ecol. 5: 562571.
  • Wolfe, J.B. & Brodie, E.D. III 1998. The coadaptation of parental and offspring characters. Evolution 52: 299308.