SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Champagnat, N., Ferrière, R. & Ben Arous, G. 2001. The canonical equation of adaptive dynamics: a mathematical view. Selection 2: 7384.
  • Dercole, F. 2002. Evolutionary Dynamics Through Bifurcation Analysis: Methods and Applications, PhD Thesis. Politecnico di Milano, Chapter 3.
  • Dieckmann, U. & Law, R. 1996. The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 34: 579612.
  • Durinx, M. & Metz, J.A.J. (in press). Multi-type branching processes and adaptive dynamics of structured populations. In: Branching Processes in Biology: Variation, Growth and Extinction (P.Haccou, P.Jagers & V.Vatutin, eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Geritz, S.A.H. 2004. Resident-invader dynamics and the coexistence of similar strategies. J. Math. Biol., in press. doi:10.1007/s00285-004-0280-8
  • Geritz, S.A.H. & Kisdi, É. 2000. Adaptive dynamics in diploid, sexual populations and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 16711678.
  • Geritz, S.A.H., Kisdi, É., Meszéna, G. & Metz, J.A.J. 1998. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12: 3557.
  • Geritz, S.A.H., Van der Meijden, E. & Metz, J.A.J. 1999. Evolutionary dynamics of seed size and seedling competitive ability. Theor. Pop. Biol. 55: 324343.
  • Geritz, S.A.H., Gyllenberg, M., Jacobs, F.J.A. & Parvinen, K. 2002. Invasion dynamics and attractor inheritance. J. Math. Biol. 44: 548560.
  • Gyllenberg, M. & Meszéna, G. 2004. On the impossibility of coexistence of infinitely many strategies. J. Math. Biol., in press.
  • Gyllenberg, M. & Metz, J.A.J. 2001. On fitness in structured metapopulations. J. Math. Biol. 43: 545560.
  • Kisdi, É. & Geritz, S.A.H. 1999. Adaptive dynamics in allele space: evolution of genetic polymorphism by small mutations in a heterogeneous environment. Evolution 53: 9931008.
  • Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402416.
  • Metz, J.A.J. & Gyllenberg, M. 2001. How should we define fitness in structured metapopulation models? Including an application to the calculation of evolutionarily stable dispersal strategies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 499508.
  • Metz, J.A.J., Nisbet, R.M. & Geritz, S.A.H. 1992. How should we define ‘fitness’ for general ecological scenarios? Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 198202.
  • Metz, J.A.J., Geritz, S.A.H., Meszéna, G., Jacobs, F.J.A. & Van Heerwaarden, J.S. 1996. Adaptive dynamics, a geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. In: Stochastic and Spatial Structures of Dynamical Systems (S. J.vanStrien & S. M.Verduyn Lunel, eds), pp. 183231. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  • Van Dooren, T.J.M. 1999. The evolutionary ecology of dominance-recessivity. J. Theor. Biol. 198: 519532.
  • Van Dooren, T.J.M. 2000. The evolutionary dynamics of direct phenotypic overdominance: emergence possible, loss probable. Evolution 54: 18991914.
  • Waxman, D. & Gavrilets, S. 2005. 20 Questions on adaptive dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 11391154.