SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barrett, S.C.H. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358: 9911004.
  • Bernasconi, G., Ashman, T.-L., Birkhead, T.R., Bishop, J.D.D., Grossniklaus, U., Kubli, E., Marshall, D.L., Schmid, B., Skogsmyr, I., Snook, R.R., Taylor, D., Till-Bottraud, I., Ward, P.I., Zeh, D.W. & Hellriegel, B. 2004. Evolutionary ecology of the prezygotic stage. Science 303: 971975.
  • Biermann, C.H. 1998. The molecular evolution of sperm bindin in six species of sea urchins (Echinoida : Strongylocentrotidae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 17611771.
  • Birkhead, T.R. & Møller, A.P. (eds) 1998. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Bishop, J.D.D. 1996. Female control of paternity in the internally fertilizing compound ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. I Autoradiographic investigation of sperm movements in the female reproductive tract. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 369376.
  • Bishop, J.D.D., Jones, C.S. & Noble, L.R. 1996. Female control of paternity in the internally fertilizing compound ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. II Investigation of male mating success using RAPD markers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 401407.
  • Brawley, S.H. 1992. Fertilisation in natural populations of the dioecious brown alga Fucus ceranoides and the importance of the polyspermy block. Mar. Biol. 113: 145157, fertilisation, polyspermy, natural spawning.
  • Brawley, S.H., Johnson, L.E., Pearson, G.A., Speransky, V., Li, R. & Serrao, E.A. 1999. Gamete release at low tide in fucoid algae: maladaptive or advantageous? Am. Zool. 39: 218231.
  • Byrne, P.G. & Roberts, J.D. 2000. Does multiple paternity improve fitness of the frog Crinia georgiana? Evolution 54: 968973.
  • Clark, A.G., Begun, D.J. & Prout, T. 1999. Female × male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283: 217220.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Evans, J.P. & Marshall, D.J. in press. Male × female interactions influence fertilization success and mediate the benefits of polyandry in the sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma. Evolution.
  • Fjerdingstad, E.J. & Boomsma, J.J. 1998. Multiple mating increases the sperm stores of Atta colombica leafcutter ant queens. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42: 257261.
  • Galindo, B.E., Vacquier, V.D. & Swanson, W.J. 2003. Positive selection in the egg receptor for abalone sperm lysin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 46394643.
  • Hellberg, M.E., Moy, G.W. & Vacquier, V.D. 2000. Positive selection and propeptide repeats promote rapid interspecific of a gastropod sperm protein. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 458466.
  • Hosken, D.J., Garner, T.W.J., Tregenza, T., Wedell, N. & Ward, P.I. 2003. Superior sperm competitors sire higher-quality young. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 19331938 (DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2443).
  • Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75: 2164.
  • Keller, L. & Reeve, H.K. 1995. Why do females mate with multiple males? The sexually selected sperm hypothesis. Adv. Stud. Anim. Behav. 24: 291315.
  • Kraus, F.B., Neumann, P., Praagh, J.V. & Moritz, R.F.A. 2004. Sperm limitation and evolution of extreme polyandry in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55: 494501.
  • Kupriyanova, E. & Havenhand, J.N. 2002. Variation in sperm swimming behaviour and its effect on fertilization success in the serpulid polychaete Galeolaria caespitosa. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 41: 2126.
  • Levitan, D.R. 2002. The relationship between conspecific fertilization success and reproductive isolation among three congeneric sea urchins. Evolution 56: 15991609.
  • Lewis, S.M. & Austad, S.N. 1990. Sources of intraspecific variation in sperm precedence in red flour beetles. Am. Nat. 135: 351359.
  • Marshall, D.J. 2002. In situ measures of spawning synchrony and fertilization in an intertidal, free-spawning invertebrate. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 236: 113119.
  • Marshall, D.J., Semmens, D. & Cook, C. 2004. Consequences of spawning at low tide: limited gamete dispersal for a rockpool anemone. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 266: 135142.
  • McCartney, M.A. & Lessios, H.A. 2002. Quantitative analysis of gametic incompatibility between closely related species of neotropical sea urchins. Biol. Bull. 202: 166181.
  • Metz, E.C. & Palumbi, S.R. 1996. Positive selection and sequence rearrangements generate extensive polymorphism in the gamete recognition protein bindin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 397406.
  • Metz, E.C., Kane, R.E., Yanagimachi, H. & Palumbi, S.R. 1994. Fertilization between closely related sea urchins is blocked by incompatibilities during sperm–egg attachment and early stages of fusion. Biol. Bull. 187: 2334.
  • Miller, G.T. & Pitnick, S. 2002. Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science 298: 12301233.
  • Nilsson, T., Fricke, C. & Arnqvist, G. 2003. The effects of male and female genotype on variance in male fertilization success in the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53: 227233.
  • Palumbi, S.R. 1999. All males are not created equal: Fertility differences depend on gamete recognition polymorphisms in sea urchins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 1263212637.
  • Palumbi, S.R. & Metz, E.C. 1991. Strong reproductive isolation between closely related tropical sea urchins (genus Echinometra). Mol. Biol. Evol. 8: 227239.
  • Parker, G.A. 1998. Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (T. R.Birkhead & A. P.Møller, eds), pp. 354. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Pemberton, A.J., Hughes, R.N., Manriquez, P.H. & Bishop, J.D.D. 2003. Efficient utilization of very dilute aquatic sperm: sperm competition may be more likely than sperm limitation when eggs are retained. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: S223S226.
  • Quinn, G.P. & Keough, M.J. 2002) Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Riginos, C. & McDonald, J.H. 2003. Positive selection on an acrosomal sperm protein, M7 lysin, in three species of the mussel genus Mytilus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 200207.
  • Swanson, W.J. & Vacquier, V.D. 2002. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nat. Rev. Gen. 3: 137144.
  • Thornhill, R. 1983. Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigricepts. Am. Nat. 122: 765788.
  • Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review. Mol. Ecol. 9: 10131027.
  • Vacquier, V.D. 1998. Evolution of gamete recognition proteins. Science 281: 19951998.
  • Vacquier, V.D. & Moy, G.W. 1977. Isolation of bindin: the protein responsible for adhesion of sperm to sea urchin eggs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74: 24562460.
  • Whitaker, M. & Swann, K. 1993. Lighting the fuse at fertilization. Development 117: 112.
  • Williams, M.E., Bentley, M.G. & Hardege, J.D. 1997. Assessment of field fertilisation success in the infaunal polychaete Arenicola marina (L.). Invert. Repro. Dev. 31: 13.
  • Wilson, N., Tubman, S.C., Eady, P.E. & Robertson, G.W. 1997. Female genotype affects male success in sperm competition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 14911495.
  • Yasui, Y. 1997. A ‘‘good-sperm’’ model can explain the evolution of costly multiple mating by females. Am. Nat. 149: 573584.
  • Yund, P.O. 2000. How severe is sperm limitation in natural populations of free spawners? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 1013.
  • Zeh, J.A. & Zeh, D.W. 1996. The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 17111717.
  • Zeh, J.A. & Zeh, D.W. 1997. The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defenses against genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 6975.
  • Zeh, J.A. & Zeh, D.W. 2003. Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility. Ethology 109: 929950.
  • Zigler, K.S., Raff, E.C., Popodi, E., Raff, R.A. & Lessios, H.A. 2003. Adaptive evolution of bindin in the genus Heliocidaris is correlated with the shift to direct development. Evolution 57: 22932302.