SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Chin-Long Ky, Carole Blay, Cédrik Lo, Half-sib family effects on cultured pearl quality traits in the black-lipped pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera: testing for indirect benefits of polyandry and polygyny, Aquaculture International, 2015,

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    R. Uma, H. Sevgili, Spermatophore allocation strategy over successive matings in the bushcricketIsophya sikorai(Orthoptera Phaneropterinae), Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 2015, 27, 2, 129

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    F. Garcia-Gonzalez, Y. Yasui, J. P. Evans, Mating portfolios: bet-hedging, sexual selection and female multiple mating, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2014, 282, 1798, 20141525

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Marlene Zuk, Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez, Marie Elisabeth Herberstein, Leigh W. Simmons, Model Systems, Taxonomic Bias, and Sexual Selection: BeyondDrosophila, Annual Review of Entomology, 2014, 59, 1, 321

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Kerstin E. Thonhauser, Shirley Raveh, Dustin J. Penn, Multiple paternity does not depend on male genetic diversity, Animal Behaviour, 2014, 93, 135

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Kerstin E. Thonhauser, Michaela Thoß, Kerstin Musolf, Teresa Klaus, Dustin J. Penn, Multiple paternity in wild house mice (Mus musculus musculus): effects on offspring genetic diversity and body mass, Ecology and Evolution, 2014, 4, 2
  7. 7
    Leigh W. Simmons, Maxine Beveridge, Lie Li, Yew-Foon Tan, A. Harvey Millar, Ontogenetic changes in seminal fluid gene expression and the protein composition of cricket seminal fluid, Evolution & Development, 2014, 16, 2
  8. 8
    B. Gray, L. W. Simmons, Acoustic cues alter perceived sperm competition risk in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus, Behavioral Ecology, 2013, 24, 4, 982

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Patricia Adair Gowaty, Adaptively flexible polyandry, Animal Behaviour, 2013, 86, 5, 877

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    S. M. Shuster, W. R. Briggs, P. A. Dennis, How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2013, 368, 1613, 20120046

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Patricia Adair Gowaty, Yong-Kyu Kim, Wyatt W. Anderson, Mendel’s law reveals fatal flaws in Bateman’s 1948 study of mating and fitness, Fly, 2013, 7, 1, 28

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    S. L. Johnson, H. J. Brockmann, Parental effects on early development: testing for indirect benefits of polyandry, Behavioral Ecology, 2013, 24, 5, 1218

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Margo I. Adler, Russell Bonduriansky, Paternal Effects on Offspring Fitness Reflect Father’s Social Environment, Evolutionary Biology, 2013, 40, 2, 288

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Ian R. K. Stewart, David F. Westneat, Patterns of hatching failure in the house sparrow Passer domesticus, Journal of Avian Biology, 2013, 44, 1
  15. 15
    C. Tuni, M. J. Albo, T. Bilde, Polyandrous females acquire indirect benefits in a nuptial feeding species, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2013, 26, 6
  16. 16
    L. W. Simmons, Y.-F. Tan, A. H. Millar, Sperm and seminal fluid proteomes of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: identification of novel proteins transferred to females at mating, Insect Molecular Biology, 2013, 22, 1
  17. 17
    Kerstin E. Thonhauser, Shirley Raveh, Attila Hettyey, Helmut Beissmann, Dustin J. Penn, Why do female mice mate with multiple males?, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2013, 67, 12, 1961

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Marc J. Klowden, Physiological Systems in Insects, 2013,

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Simon Ducatez, M. Baguette, V. M. Stevens, D. Legrand, H. Fréville, COMPLEX INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PATERNAL AND MATERNAL EFFECTS: PARENTAL EXPERIENCE AND AGE AT REPRODUCTION AFFECT FECUNDITY AND OFFSPRING PERFORMANCE IN A BUTTERFLY, Evolution, 2012, 66, 11
  20. 20
    Rachel A. Slatyer, Brian S. Mautz, Patricia R.Y. Backwell, Michael D. Jennions, Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis, Biological Reviews, 2012, 87, 1
  21. 21
    L. W. Simmons, J. L. Fitzpatrick, Sperm wars and the evolution of male fertility, Reproduction, 2012, 144, 5, 519

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    LEIGH W. SIMMONS, Allocation of maternal- and ejaculate-derived proteins to reproduction in female crickets, Teleogryllus oceanicus, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2011, 24, 1
  23. 23
    Isabel M. Smallegange, Effects of paternal phenotype and environmental variability on age and size at maturity in a male dimorphic mite, Naturwissenschaften, 2011, 98, 4, 339

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    P. G. Byrne, M. J. Whiting, Effects of simultaneous polyandry on offspring fitness in an African tree frog, Behavioral Ecology, 2011, 22, 2, 385

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Thomas F. Hansen, Christophe Pélabon, David Houle, Heritability is not Evolvability, Evolutionary Biology, 2011, 38, 3, 258

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Brian E. Gress, Clint D. Kelly, Is sperm viability independent of ejaculate size in the house cricket (Acheta domesticus)?, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2011, 89, 12, 1231

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Kenyon B. Mobley, Charlotta Kvarnemo, Ingrid Ahnesjö, Charlyn Partridge, Anders Berglund, Adam G. Jones, The effect of maternal body size on embryo survivorship in the broods of pregnant male pipefish, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2011, 65, 6, 1169

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    MELISSA L. THOMAS, LEIGH W. SIMMONS, Cuticular hydrocarbons influence female attractiveness to males in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2010, 23, 4
  29. You have free access to this content29
    F. GARCIA-GONZALEZ, L. W. SIMMONS, Male-induced costs of mating for females compensated by offspring viability benefits in an insect, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2010, 23, 10
  30. 30
    Attila Hettyey, Gergely Hegyi, Mikael Puurtinen, Herbert Hoi, János Török, Dustin J. Penn, Mate Choice for Genetic Benefits: Time to Put the Pieces Together, Ethology, 2010, 116, 1
  31. 31
    Damian K. Dowling, Magdalena Nystrand, Leigh W. Simmons, MATERNAL EFFECTS, BUT NO GOOD OR COMPATIBLE GENES FOR SPERM COMPETITIVENESS IN AUSTRALIAN CRICKETS, Evolution, 2010, 64, 5
  32. 32
    Dennis Sprenger, Rolanda Lange, Nico K. Michiels, Nils Anthes, Sources of phenotypic variance in egg and larval traits in a marine invertebrate, Evolutionary Ecology, 2010, 24, 1, 185

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Martin A. Dziminski, J. D. Roberts, Leigh W. Simmons, Sperm morphology, motility and fertilisation capacity in the myobatrachid frogCrinia georgiana, Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 2010, 22, 3, 516

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Sabrina Bertin, Francesca Scolari, Carmela R. Guglielmino, Mariangela Bonizzoni, Angelica Bonomi, Daniela Marchini, Ludvik M. Gomulski, Giuliano Gasperi, Anna R. Malacrida, Carlo Matessi, Sperm storage and use in polyandrous females of the globally invasive fruitfly, Ceratitis capitata, Journal of Insect Physiology, 2010, 56, 11, 1542

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    L. W. Simmons, M. Beveridge, The strength of postcopulatory sexual selection within natural populations of field crickets, Behavioral Ecology, 2010, 21, 6, 1179

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    S. Caesar, A. Forsman, Do polyandrous pygmy grasshopper females obtain fitness benefits for their offspring?, Behavioral Ecology, 2009, 20, 2, 354

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    S. Le Cam, J. A. Pechenik, M. Cagnon, F. Viard, Fast versus Slow Larval Growth in an Invasive Marine Mollusc: Does Paternity Matter?, Journal of Heredity, 2009, 100, 4, 455

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Luke Holman, Sperm viability staining in ecology and evolution: potential pitfalls, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2009, 63, 11, 1679

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Francisco García-González, MALE GENETIC QUALITY AND THE INEQUALITY BETWEEN PATERNITY SUCCESS AND FERTILIZATION SUCCESS: CONSEQUENCES FOR STUDIES OF SPERM COMPETITION AND THE EVOLUTION OF POLYANDRY, Evolution, 2008, 62, 7
  40. 40
    Jeanne A. Zeh, David W. Zeh, Maternal inheritance, epigenetics and the evolution of polyandry, Genetica, 2008, 134, 1, 45

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Dennis Sprenger, Nils Anthes, Nico K. Michiels, Multiple mating affects offspring size in the opisthobranch Chelidonura sandrana, Marine Biology, 2008, 153, 5, 891

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Jan Kennis, Vincent Sluydts, Herwig Leirs, W.F. Pim van Hooft, Polyandry and polygyny in an African rodent pest species, Mastomys natalensis, mammalia, 2008, 72, 3

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    Renée C. Firman, Leigh W. Simmons, POLYANDRY FACILITATES POSTCOPULATORY INBREEDING AVOIDANCE IN HOUSE MICE, Evolution, 2008, 62, 3
  44. 44
    R. C. Firman, L. W. Simmons, Polyandry, sperm competition, and reproductive success in mice, Behavioral Ecology, 2008, 19, 4, 695

    CrossRef

  45. 45
    R. C. FIRMAN, L. W. SIMMONS, The frequency of multiple paternity predicts variation in testes size among island populations of house mice, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2008, 21, 6
  46. 46
    Marc J. Klowden, Physiological Systems in Insects, 2008,

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    C. Eizaguirre, D. Laloi, M. Massot, M. Richard, P. Federici, J. Clobert, Condition dependence of reproductive strategy and the benefits of polyandry in a viviparous lizard, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007, 274, 1608, 425

    CrossRef

  48. 48
    M. D. JENNIONS, J. M. DRAYTON, R. BROOKS, J. HUNT, Do female black field crickets Teleogryllus commodus benefit from polyandry?, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2007, 20, 4
  49. 49
    Clarissa M. House, John Hunt, David J. Hosken, Evolution: Lending a Helping Hand in Sperm Competition?, Current Biology, 2007, 17, 3, R90

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    L. W. SIMMONS, F. GARCÍA-GONZÁLEZ, Female crickets trade offspring viability for fecundity, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2007, 20, 4
  51. 51
    T. M. IVY, Good genes, genetic compatibility and the evolution of polyandry: use of the diallel cross to address competing hypotheses, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2007, 20, 2
  52. 52
    T. M. PANHUIS, L. NUNNEY, Insight into post-mating interactions between the sexes: relatedness suppresses productivity of singly mated female Drosophila melanogaster, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2007, 20, 5
  53. 53
    Jarle Tryti Nordeide, Is there more in ‘gamete quality’ than quality of the gametes? A review of effects of female mate choice and genetic compatibility on offspring quality, Aquaculture Research, 2007, 38, 1
  54. 54
    Melissa L. Thomas, Leigh W. Simmons, Male Crickets Adjust the Viability of Their Sperm in Response to Female Mating Status, The American Naturalist, 2007, 170, 2, 190

    CrossRef

  55. 55
    Francisco García-González, Leigh W. Simmons, Paternal Indirect Genetic Effects on Offspring Viability and the Benefits of Polyandry, Current Biology, 2007, 17, 1, 32

    CrossRef

  56. 56
    Jonathan P. Evans, Francisco García-González, Dustin J. Marshall, SOURCES OF GENETIC AND PHENOTYPIC VARIANCE IN FERTILIZATION RATES AND LARVAL TRAITS IN A SEA URCHIN, Evolution, 2007, 61, 12
  57. 57
    Bart Kempenaers, 2007,

    CrossRef

  58. 58
    K. Vahed, Larger ejaculate volumes are associated with a lower degree of polyandry across bushcricket taxa, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2006, 273, 1599, 2387

    CrossRef

  59. 59
    LEIGH W. SIMMONS, MAXINE BEVERIDGE, NINA WEDELL, TOM TREGENZA, Postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance by female crickets only revealed by molecular markers, Molecular Ecology, 2006, 15, 12
  60. 60
    Manuel J. Vélez, H. Jane Brockmann, Seasonal Variation in Female Response to Male Calling Song in the Field Cricket, Gryllus rubens, Ethology, 2006, 112, 11
  61. 61
    Leigh W. Simmons, The Evolution of Polyandry: Sperm Competition, Sperm Selection, and Offspring Viability, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2005, 36, 1, 125

    CrossRef

  62. 62
    Scott K. Sakaluk, Carie Weddle, John Hunt, Signal Reliability, Sex-Specific Genotype-by-Environment Interactions in Cuticular Hydrocarbon Expression, and the Maintenance of Polyandry through Chemosensory Self-Referencing in Decorated Crickets, Gryllodes sigillatus,