SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alexander, R., Marshall, D. & Cooley, J. 1997. Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. In: The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (J.Choe & B.Crespi, eds). pp. 131. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Andersen, N.M. 1975. The Limnogonus and Neogerris of the old world with character analysis and a reclassification of the Gerrinae (Hemiptera: Gerridae). Entomol. Scand. 7 (Suppl.): 196.
  • Andersen, N.M. 1982. The Semiaquatic Bugs (Hemiptera: Gerromorpha): Phylogeny, Adaptations, Biogeography and Classification. Scandinavian Science Press, Klampenborg, Denmark.
  • Andersen, N.M. 1990. Phylogeny and taxonomy of water striders, genus Aquarius Schellenberg (Insecta, Hemiptera, Gerridae), with a new species from Australia. Seenstrupia 16: 3781.
  • Arnaud, L., Haubruge, E. Gage, M.J.G. 2001. Morphology of Tribolium castaneum male genitalia and its possible role in sperm competition and cryptic female choice. Belg. J. Zool. 131: 111115.
  • Arnqvist, G. 1989. Sexual selection in a water strider – the function, mechanism of selection and heritability of a male grasping apparatus. Oikos 56: 344350.
  • Arnqvist, G. 1997a. The evolution of water strider mating systems: causes and consequences of sexual conflicts. In: The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (J.Choe & B.Crespi, eds), pp. 146163. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.
  • Arnqvist, G. 1997b. The evolution of animal genitalia: distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60: 365379.
  • Arnqvist, G. 1998. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393: 784786.
  • Arnqvist, G. & Danielsson, I. 1999. Postmating sexual selection: the effects of male body size and recovery period on paternity and egg production rate in a water strider. Behav. Ecol. 10: 358365.
  • Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 1995. Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes – a morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci. 261: 123127.
  • Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2002a. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56: 936947.
  • Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2002b. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415: 787789.
  • Arnqvist, G. & Thornhill, R. 1998. Evolution of animal genitalia: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in water strider (Heteroptera: Gerridae: Insecta). Genet. Res. 71: 193212.
  • Arnqvist, G., Thornhill, R. & Rowe, L. 1997. Evolution of animal genitalia: morphological correlates of fitness components in a water strider. J. Evol. Biol. 10: 613640.
  • Artiss, T. 2001. Structure and function of male genitalia in Libellula, Ladona and Plathemis (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 30: 1327.
  • Blanckenhorn, W.U. 1991. Life-history differences in adjacent water strider populations: phenotypic plasticity or heritable responses to stream temperature? Evolution 45: 15201525.
  • Blanckenhorn, W.U., Preziosi, R.F. & Fairbairn, D.J. 1995. Time and energy constraints and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism - to eat or to mate. Evol. Ecol. 9: 369381.
  • Brennan, J.M. 1993. Clinal variation in morphology in eastern populations of the stream-dwelling waterstrider, Aquarius remigis (Hemiptera: Gerridae). M. Sc. Thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
  • Brodie, E.D., Moore, A.J. & Janzen, F.J. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 313318.
  • Calabrese, D.M. 1979. Pterygomorphism in 10 nearctic species of gerris. Am. Midl. Nat. 101: 6168.
  • Campbell, V. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2001. Prolonged copulation and the internal dynamics of sperm transfer in the water strider Aquarius remigis. Can. J. Zool. 79: 18011812.
  • Cordoba-Aguilar, A. 2000. Evolucion y diversidad de la morfologia de los genitales masculinos en insectos. Folia Entomol. Mex. 110: 95111.
  • Damgaard, J., Andersen, N.M. & Sperling, F.A.H. 2000. Phylogeny of the water strider genus Aquarius Schellenberg (Heteroptera: Gerridae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences and morphology. Insect. Syst. Evol. 31: 7190.
  • Damgaard, J. & Cognato, A. 2003. Sources of character conflict in a clade of water striders (Heteroptera: Gerridae). Cladistics 19: 512526.
  • Danielsson, I. & Askenmo, C. 1999. Male genital traits and mating interval affect male fertilization success in the water strider Gerris lacustris. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46: 149156.
  • Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Murray, London.
  • Dufour, L. 1844. Anatomie générale des Diptères. Ann. Sci. Nat. 1: 244264.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 1985. Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard University Press, Harvard.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 1993a. Evaluating models of sexual selection – genitalia as a test-case. Am. Nat. 142: 564571.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 1993b. Copulatory Courtship and Morphology of Genitalic Coupling in 7 Phyllophaga Species (Coleoptera, Melolonthidae). J. Nat.l Hist. 27: 683717.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 1997. Sexual selection by cryptic female choice in insects and arachnids. In: The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects (J.Choe & B.Crespi, eds), pp. 3257. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 1998. Female roles in sperm competition. In: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (T.Birkhead & A.Moller, eds), pp. 91116. Academic Press, London.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 2001. Species-specific genitalic copulatory courtship in sepsid flies (Diptera, Sepsidae, Microsepsis) and theories of genitalic evolution. Evolution 55: 93102.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 2004a. Male–female conflict and genitalia: failure to confirm predictions in insects and spiders. Biol. Rev. 79: 121186.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 2004b. Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice. Evolution 58: 19471970.
  • Eberhard, W.G., Huber, B.A., Rodriguez, R.L., Briceno, R.D., Salas, I. & Rodriquez, V. 1998. One size fits all? Relationships between the size and degree of variation in genitalia and other body parts in twenty species of insects and spiders. Evolution 52: 415431.
  • Fairbairn, D.J. 1985. Comparative ecology of Gerris remigis (Hemiptera: Gerridae) in 2 Habitats – a Paradox of Habitat Choice. Can. J. Zool. 63: 25942603.
  • Fairbairn, D.J. 1986. Does alary dimorphism imply dispersal dimorphism in the waterstriderGerris remigis? Ecol. Entomol. 11: 355368.
  • Fairbairn, D.J. 1988. Sexual selection for homogamy in the gerridae: an extension of Ridley's comparative approach. Evolution 42: 12121222.
  • Fairbairn, D.J. 1992. The origins of allometry: size and shape polymorphism in the common waterstrider, Gerris remigis Say. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 45: 167186.
  • Fairbairn, D.J. & Desranleau, L. 1987. Flight threshold, wing muscle histolysis, and alary polymorphism – correlated traits for dispersal tendency in the Gerridae. Ecol. Entomol. 12: 1324.
  • Fairbairn, D.J. & Preziosi, R.F. 1994. Sexual selection and the evolution of allometry for sexual size dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius-Remigis. Am. Nat. 144: 101118.
  • Fairbairn, D.J. & Preziosi, R.F. 1996. Sexual selection and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius remigis. Evolution 50: 15491559.
  • Fairbairn, D.J. & Reeve, J.P. 2001. Natural selection. In: Evolutionary Ecology. Concepts and Case Studies. (C. W.Fox, D. A.Roff & D. J.Fairbairn, eds), pp. 2943. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Fairbairn, D.J., Vermette, R., Kapoor, N.N. & Zahiri, N. 2003. Functional morphology of sexually selected genitalia in the water strider Aquarius remigis. Can. J. Zool. 81: 400413.
  • Ferguson, I.M. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2000. Sex-specific selection and sexual size dimorphism in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 160170.
  • Gallant, S.L. & Fairbairn, D.J. 1996. A new species of Aquarius from the southeastern United States, with electrophoretic analysis of the clade containing Gerris, Limnoporus, and Aquarius (Hemiptera: Gerridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 89: 637644.
  • Gallant, S.L., Preziosi, R.F. & Fairbairn, D.J. 1993. Clinical variation in eastern populations of the waterstrider Aquarius Remigis– Gradual intergradation or discontinuity. Evolution 47: 957964.
  • Gentile, G. 1998. Daily patterns of oviposition mediate sexual conflict in a polygynandrous mating system. M.Sc.Thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
  • Ghiselin, M. 1974. The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA USA.
  • Goulson, D. 1993. Variation in the genitalia of the butterfly Maniola jurtina (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae). Zool. J. Lin. Soc. 107: 6571.
  • Grant, V. 1995. Sexual selection in plants – pros and cons. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 12471250.
  • Hersch, E.I. & Phillips, P.C. 2004. Power and potential bias in field studies of natural selection. Evolution 58: 479485.
  • Hosken, D.J. & Stockley, P. 2004. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 8793.
  • Hosmer, D. & Lemeshow, S. 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley, New York.
  • House, C.M. & Simmons, L.W. 2003. Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci. 270: 447455.
  • Kaitala, A. & Dingle, H. 1993. Wing dimorphism, territoriality and mating frequency of the waterstrider Aquarius-remigis (say). Annales Zoologici Fennici. 30: 163168.
  • Kingsolver, J.G., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hill, C.E., Hoang, A., Gibert, P. & Beerli, P. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157: 245261.
  • Krupa, J.J. & Sih, A. 1993. Experimental studies on water strider mating dynamics – spatial variation in density and sex-ratio. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33: 107120.
  • Krupa, J.J. & Sih, A. 1998. Fishing spiders, green sunfish, and a stream-dwelling water strider: male–female conflict and prey responses to single versus multiple predator environments. Oecologia 117: 258265.
  • Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 12101226.
  • Lauer, M.J., Sih, A. & Krupa, J.J. 1996. Male density, female density and inter-sexual conflict in a stream-dwelling insect. Anim. Behav. 52: 929939.
  • Mason, L.G. 1980. Sexual selection and the evolution of pair-bonding in soldier beetles. Evolution 34: 174180.
  • Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Michel, F. 1961. The taxonomic value of male genitalia of the genus Gerris Fabricus(Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerridae). M. Sc. Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
  • Pampel, F. 2000. Logistic Regression: A Primer. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
  • Parker, G.A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Selection Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (M. S.Blum & N. A.Blum, eds), pp. 123166. Academic Press, New York.
  • Phillips, P.C. & Arnold, S.J. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43: 12091222.
  • Preziosi, R.F. & Fairbairn, D.J. 1992. Genetic population-structure and levels of gene flow in the stream dwelling waterstrider, Aquarius (=Gerris) remigis (Hemiptera, Gerridae). Evolution 46: 430444.
  • Preziosi, R.F. & Fairbairn, D.J. 1996. Sexual size dimorphism and selection in the wild in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis: body size, components of body size and male mating success. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 317336.
  • Preziosi, R.F. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2000. Lifetime selection on adult body size and components of body size in a waterstrider: Opposing selection and maintenance of sexual size dimorphism. Evolution 54: 558566.
  • Preziosi, R.F. & Roff, D.A. 1998. Evidence of genetic isolation between sexually monomorphic and sexually dimorphic traits in the water strider Aquarius remigis. Heredity 81: 9299.
  • Rice, W.R. 2000. Dangerous liaisons. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 1295312955.
  • Rowe, L. & Arnqvist, G. 2002. Sexually antagonistic coevolution in a mating system: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes. Evolution 56: 754767.
  • Rubenstein, D.I. 1984. Resource acquisition and alternative mating strategies in water striders. Am. Zool. 24: 345353.
  • Shapiro, A.M. & Porter, A.H. 1989. The lock-and-key hypothesis: evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 34: 231245.
  • Sih, A. & Krupa, J.J. 1992. Predation risk, food-deprivation and nonrandom mating by size in the stream water strider, Aquarius-remigis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31: 5156.
  • Sih, A. & Krupa, J.J. 1995. Interacting effects of predation risk and male and female density on male–female conflicts and mating dynamics of stream water striders. Behav. Ecol. 6: 316325.
  • Sih, A., Lauer, M. & Krupa, J.J. 2002. Path analysis and the relative importance of male-female conflict, female choice and male-male competition in water striders. Anim. Behav. 63: 10791089.
  • Simmons, L. 2001. Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Sirot, L.K. 2003. The evolution of insect mating structures through sexual selection. Fla. Entomol. 86: 124133.
  • Takami, Y. 2003. Experimental analysis of the effect of genital morphology on insemination success in the ground beetle Carabus insulicola (Coleoptera Carabidae). Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 15: 5161.
  • Trivers, R.L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (B.Campbell, ed.), pp. 136179. Heinemann, Chicago.
  • Vermette, R. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2002. How well do mating frequency and duration predict paternity success in the polygynandrous water strider Aquarius remigis? Evolution 56: 18081820.
  • Watson, P.J., Arnqvist, G. & Stallmann, R.R. 1998. Sexual conflict and the energetic costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Am. Nat. 151: 4658.
  • Weigensberg, I. & Fairbairn, D.J. 1994. Conflicts of interest between the sexes – a study of mating interactions in a semiaquatic bug. Anim. Behav. 48: 893901.
  • Weigensberg, I. & Fairbairn, D.J. 1996. The sexual arms race and phenotypic correlates of mating success in the waterstrider, Aquarius remigis (Hemiptera: Gerridae). J. Ins. Behav. 9: 307319.
  • Wilcox, R.S. 1984. Male copulatory guarding enhances female foraging in a water strider. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15: 171174.
  • Yang, L.H. & Wang, Q. 2004. Precopulation sexual selection in Nysius huttoni White (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) in relation to morphometric traits. J. Ins. Behav. 17: 695707.