Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system
Article first published online: 11 MAY 2005
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 18, Issue 5, pages 1315–1323, September 2005
How to Cite
ORTEIZA, N., LINDER, J. E. and RICE, W. R. (2005), Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18: 1315–1323. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00923.x
- Issue published online: 25 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 11 MAY 2005
- Received 3 February 2005; revised 11 February 2005; accepted 11 February 2005
- 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
- 2003. The origin of interlocus sexual conflict: is sex-linkage important? J. Evol. Biol. 16: 219. &
- 1989. Multiple mating in a water strider: mutual benefits or intersexual conflict? Anim. Behav. 38: 749–756.
- 1992. Pre-copulatory fighting in a water strider - inter-sexual conflict or mate assessment. Anim. Behav. 43: 559.
- 2004. No evidence that polyandry benefits females in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 58: 1242–1250. , , &
- 1993. Repeated matings offset costs of reproduction in female crickets. Evol. Ecol. 7: 240–250. &
- 1993. No reduction in the cost of mating for Drosophila melanogaster females mating with spermless males. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 253: 211–217. , &
- 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373: 241–244. , , , &
- 1994. Remating and male-derived nutrients in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 7: 51–69. , &
- 2001. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 1671–1675. , &
- 2000. Correlated effects of sperm competition and postmating female mortality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 13162–13165. &
- 1976. Deleterious effects of copulation in Drosophila females as a function of growth temperature of both sexes. Experientia 32: 696–697. &
- 2003. Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a crucial review of some current research. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 1–6. &
- 2000. Genital damage, kicking and early death. Nature 407: 855–856. &
- 1981. The relationship between lifespan and reproduction in the grasshopper melanoplus. Oecologia 49: 385–388.
- 1989. A cost of mating in female fruit flies. Nature 338: 760–761. &
- 2003. Fitness effects of female mate choice: preferred males are detrimental for Drosophila melanogaster females. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 797–811. &
- 2002. The X is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 269: 499–504. , &
- 2002. Sexual selection fails to promote adaptation to a new environment. Evolution 56: 721–730.
- 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic co-evolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 5083–5088. &
- 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195–204.
- 1986. Repetitive mating and female fitness in Dysdercus cardinalis (Hemiptera, Pyrrhocoridae). Zoo. J. Lennean Soc. 88: 191–199.
- 1962. Sperm transfer, storage, displacement, and utilization in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 47: 1719–1736. &
- 1983. Forced copulation in waterfowl. Behavior 86: 250–294. , &
- 1976. What determines the rate of evolution? Am. Nat. 110: 331–338.
- 2001. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female mate choice and male social dominance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 268: 517–533. , , &
- 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (M. S.Blum & N. A.Blum, eds), pp. 123–166. Academic press, New York.
- 1990. Nonmating costs of exposure to males in female Drosophila-melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 36: 419–425. &
- 1987. Effects of egg-production and of exposure to males on female survival in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Phsiol. 33: 745–749. , &
- 2002. Harm to females increase with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 269: 1821–1828. &
- 1997. Phylogenetic examination of female incorporation of ejaculate in Drosophila. Evolution 51: 833–845. , &
- 2000. Seminal fluid causes temporarily reduced egg hatch in previously mated females. Proc. R. Soc. B. 267: 201–203. &
- 1978. Repeated mating by female drosophila-melanogaster – adaptive importance. Experientia 34: 449–450. &
- 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381: 232–234.
- 1997. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE) and the intraspecific red queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 1–10. &
- 2001. Sexual recombination and the power of natural selection. Science 294: 555–559. &
- 1994. Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns – water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 289–293. , , &
- 2001. Male genotype affects female longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 55: 834–839. &
- 1952. Mating behavior within the genus Drosophila (Diptera). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 99: 395–474.
- 1972, Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Decent of Man (B.Campbell, ed.), pp. 136–179. Heinemann, London.