SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alford, R.A. 1999. Ecology: Resource use, competition and predation. In Tadpoles: The biology of anuran larvae (R. W.McDiarmid & R.Altig, eds). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Altwegg, R. & Reyer, H.U. 2003. Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs. Evolution 57: 872882.
  • Beachy, C.K. 1993. Differences in variation in egg size for several species of salamanders (Amphibia: Caudata) that use different larval environments. Brimleyana 0: 7182.
  • Berven, K.A. & Chadra, B.G. 1988. The relationship among egg size, density and food level on larval development in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Oecologia 75: 6772.
  • Brooks, R.J., Bobyn, M.L., Galbraith, D.A., Layfield, J.A. & Nancekivell, E.G. 1991. Maternal and Environmental-Influences on Growth and Survival of Embryonic and Hatchling Snapping Turtles (Chelydra-Serpentina). Can. J. Zool. 69: 26672676.
  • Byrne, P.G. 2004. Male sperm expenditure under sperm competition risk and intensity in quacking frogs. Behav. Ecol. 15: 857863.
  • Byrne, P.G. & Roberts, J.D. 1999. Simultaneous mating with multiple males reduces fertilization success in the myobatrachid frog Crinia georgiana. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 266: 717721.
  • Byrne, P.G. & Roberts, J.D. 2004. Intrasexual selection and group spawning in quacking frogs (Crinia georgiana). Behav. Ecol. 15: 872882.
  • Capinera, J.L. 1979. Quantitative variation in plants and insects: effect of propagule size on ecological plasticity. Am. Nat. 114: 350361.
  • Castellano, S., Cucco, M. & Giacoma, C. 2004.Reproductive investment of female Green Toads (Bufo viridis). Copeia 2004, 659664.
  • Crump, M.L. 1981. Variation in propagule size as a function of environmental uncertainty for three frogs. Am. Nat. 117: 724737.
  • Crump, M.L. 1984.Intraclutch egg size variability in Hyla crucifer (Anura: Hylidae). Copeia 1984: 302308.
  • Doughty, P. 2002.Coevolution of developmental plasticity and large egg size in Crinia georgiana tadpoles. Copeia 2002: 928937.
  • Doughty, P. & Roberts, J.D. 2003. Plasticity in age and size at metamorphosis of Crinia georgiana tadpoles: Responses to variation in food levels and deteriorating conditions during development. Aust. J. Zool. 51: 271284.
  • Dziminski, M.A. & Alford, R.A. 2005.Patterns and fitness consequences of intraclutch variation in egg provisioning in tropical Australian frogs. Oecologia http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0177-2 .
  • Einum, S. & Fleming, I.A. 2002. Does within-population variation in fish egg size reflect maternal influences on optimal values? Am. Nat. 160: 756765.
  • Einum, S. & Fleming, I.A. 2004. Environmental unpredictability and offspring size: conservative versus diversified bet-hedging. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6: 443455.
  • Fox, C.W., Czesak, M.E. & Fox, R.W. 2001. Consequences of plant resistance for herbivore survivorship, growth, and selection on egg size. Ecology 82: 27902804.
  • Fox, C.W. & Mousseau, T.A. 1996. Larval host plant affects fitness consequences of egg size variation in the seed beetle Stator limbatus. Oecologia 107: 541548.
  • Gosner, K.L. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16: 183190.
  • Howard, R.D. 1978. The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. Evolution 32: 850871.
  • Kaplan, R.H. 1980. The implications of ovum size variability for offspring fitness and clutch size within several populations of salamanders (Ambystoma). Evolution 34: 5164.
  • Kaplan, R.H. 1992. Greater maternal investment can decrease offspring survival in the frog Bombina orientalis. Ecology 73: 280288.
  • Kaplan, R.H. & Cooper, W.S. 1984. The evolution of developmental plasticity in reproductive characteristics: an application of the ‘‘adaptive coin-flipping’’ principle. Am. Nat. 123: 393410.
  • Kaplan, R.H. & King, E.G. 1997. Egg size is a developmentally plastic trait: Evidence from long term studies in the frog Bombina orientalis. Herpetologica 53: 149165.
  • Koops, M.A., Hutchings, J.A. & Adams, B.K. 2003. Environmental predictability and the cost of imperfect information: Influences on offspring size variability. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5: 2942.
  • Krist, M., Remes, V., Uvirova, L., Nadvornik, P. & Bures, S. 2004. Egg size and offspring performance in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis): a within-clutch approach. Oecologia 140: 5260.
  • Kudo, S. 2001. Intraclutch egg-size variation in acanthosomatid bugs: adaptive allocation of maternal investment? Oikos 92: 208214.
  • Laugen, A.T., Laurila, A. & Merila, J. 2002. Maternal and genetic contributions to geographical variation in Rana temporaria larval life-history traits. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 76: 6170.
  • Lloyd, D.G. 1987. Selection of offspring size at independence and other size-versus-number strategies. Am. Nat. 129: 800817.
  • Loman, J. 2002. Microevolution and maternal effects on tadpole Rana temporaria growth and development rate. J. Zool. 257: 9399.
  • Main, A.R. 1957. Studies in Australian Amphibia I. The genus Crinia Tschudi in south-western Australia and some species from south-eastern Australia. Aust. J. Zool. 5: 3055.
  • McGinley, M.A., Temme, D.H. & Geber, M.A. 1987. Parental investment in offspring in variable environments: theoretical and empirical considerations. Am. Nat. 130: 370398.
  • Mousseau, T.A. & Fox, C.W. 1998. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 403407.
  • Oksanen, T.A., Jonsson, P., Koskela, E. & Mappes, T. 2001. Optimal allocation of reproductive effort: manipulation of offspring number and size in the bank vole. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 268: 661666.
  • Parichy, D.M. & Kaplan, R.H. 1992. Maternal effects on offspring growth and development depend on environmental quality in the frog Bombina orientalis. Oecologia 91: 579586.
  • Philippi, T. & Seger, J. 1989. Hedging Ones Evolutionary Bets, Revisited. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4: 4144.
  • Poulin, R. & Hamilton, W.J. 2000. Egg size variation as a function of environmental variability in parasitic trematodes. Can. J. Zool. 78: 564569.
  • Reznick, D. & Yang, A.P. 1993. The influence of fluctuating resources on life-history – patterns of allocation and plasticity in female guppies. Ecology 74: 20112019.
  • Sehgal, H.S. & Toor, H.S. 1991. Offspring fitness and fecundity of an indian major carp, labeo-rohita (Ham), in relation to egg size. Aquaculture 97: 269279.
  • Seymour, R.S., Roberts, J.D., Mitchell, N.J. & Blaylock, A.J. 2000. Influence of environmental oxygen on development and hatching of aquatic eggs of the Australian frog, Crinia georgiana. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 73: 501507.
  • Smith, C.C. & Fretwell, S.D. 1974. The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am. Nat. 108: 499506.
  • Smith, H.G., Ohlsson, T. & Wettermark, K.J. 1995. Adaptive significance of egg size in the European starling – experimental tests. Ecology 76: 17.
  • Smith, M.J. & Roberts, J.D. 2003. Call structure may affect male mating success in the quacking frog Crinia georgiana (Anura: Myobatrachidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53: 221226.
  • Tejedo, M. 1992. Absence of the trade-off between the size and number of offspring in the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita). Oecologia 90: 294296.
  • Tejedo, M. & Reques, R. 1992. Effects of egg size and density on metamorphic traits in tadpoles of the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita). J. Herp. 26: 146152.
  • Wassersug, R.J. 1975. The adaptive significance of the tadpole stage with comments on the maintenance of complex life cycles in anurans. Am. Zool. 15: 405417.
  • Wilbur, H.M. & Collins, J.P. 1973. Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science 182: 13051314.
  • Williamson, I. & Bull, C.M. 1989. Life history variation in a population of the Australian frog Ranidella signifera: egg size and early development. Copeia 349356.
  • Winkler, D.W. & Wallin, K. 1987. Offspring size and number: A life history model linking effort per offspring and total effort. Am. Nat. 129: 708720.
  • Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.