SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Al-Rabab'ah, M.A. & Williams, C.G. 2002. Population dynamics of Pinus taeda L. based on nuclear microsatellites. For. Ecol. Manage. 163: 263271.
  • Axelrod, D.I. 1981. Holocene climatic changes in relation to vegetation disjunction and speciation. Am. Nat. 117: 847870.
  • Beaumont, M.A. & Balding, D.J. 2004. Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans. Mol. Ecol. 13: 969980.
  • Beaumont, M.A. & Nichols, R.A. 1996. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 263: 16191626.
  • Cornuet, J.-M. & Luikart, G. 1996. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144: 20012014.
  • Delgado, P., Pinero, D., Chaos, A., Perez-Nasser, N. & Alvarez-Buylla, E.R. 1999. High population differentiation and genetic variation in the endangered Mexican pine Pinus rzedowskii (Pinaceae). Am. J. Bot. 86: 669676.
  • Devey, M.E., Bell, J.C., Uren, T.L. & Moran, G.F. 2002. A set of microsatellite markers for fingerprinting and breeding applications in Pinus radiata. Genome 45: 984989.
  • Eldridge K. 1978. Seed collections in California in 1978. Aust. CSIRO Div. for. Res. Annu. Rep. 19771978.
  • Felsenstein, J. 1993. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) Version 3.5c. Distributed by the author. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Guinon, M., Hood, J.V. & Libby, W.J. 1982. A clonal study of intraspecific variability in radiata pine. Aust. For. Res. 12: 191201.
  • Hamrick, J.L., Godt, M.J. & Sherman-Broyles, S. 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. N. For. 6: 95124.
  • Hong, Y.P., Hipkins, V.D. & Strauss, S.H. 1993. Chloroplast DNA diversity among trees, populations, and species in the California closed pines (Pinus radiata, P. muricata, and P. attenuata). Genetics 135: 11871196.
  • Karhu, A., Hurme, P., Karjalainen, M., Karvonen, P., Kärkkäinen, K., Neale, D.B. & Savolainen, O. 1996. Do molecular markers reflect patterns of differentiation in adaptive traits of conifers? Theor. Appl. Genet. 93: 215221.
  • Lavery, P.B., Mead, D.J. 1998. Pinus radiata: a narrow endemic from North America takes on the world. In: Ecology and biogeography of Pinus (D.M.Richardson, ed.). 432449. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Ledig, F.T. 1998. Genetic variation in Pinus. In: Ecology and biogeography of Pinus (D.M.Richardson, ed.). 251280. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Ledig, T.F., Hodgkiss, P.D. & Jacob-Cervantes, V. 2002. Genetic diversity, mating system, and conservation of a Mexican subalpine relict, Picea mexicana Martínez. Conserv. Genet. 3: 113122.
  • Lewis, P.O. & Zaykin, D. 2001. Genetic Data Analysis: Computer program for the analysis of allelic data. Version 1.0 (d16c). Free program distributed by the authors over the internet from http://lewis.eeb.uconn.edu/lewishome/software.html
  • Liewlaksaneeyanawin, C., Ritland, C.E., El-Kassaby, Y.A. & Ritland, K. 2004. Since-copy, species-transferable microsatellite markers developed from loblolly pine ESTs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 361369.
  • Luikart, G., Allendorf, F.W., Cornuet, J.-M. & Sherwin, W.B. 1998. Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. J. Hered. 89: 238247.
  • Mariette, S., Chagné, D., Lezier, C., PAstuszka, P., Baffin, A., Plomion, C. & Kremer, A. 2001. Genetic diversity within and among Pinus pinaster populations: comparison betwen AFLP and microsatellite markers. Heredity 86: 469479.
  • Millar, C. 1997. Quaternary evolution of Pinus radiata. FRI Bulletin 203: 2225.
  • Millar, C.I. 2000. Evolution and biogeography of Pinus radiata with a proposed revision of its Quaternary history. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 29: 335365.
  • Moran, G.F., Bell, J.C. & Matheson, A.C. 1980. The genetic structure and levels of inbreeding in a Pinus radiata seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 29: 190193.
  • Moran, G.F., Bell, J.C. & Eldridge, K.G. 1988. The genetic structure and the conservation of the five natural populations of Pinus radiata. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 506514.
  • Muona, O. 1990. Population genetics in forest tree improvement. In: Plant population genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources (A.H.D.Brown, M.T.Clegg, A.L.Kahler & B.S.Weir, eds). 282298. Sunderland, Mass.
  • Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106: 283292.
  • Nei, M., Maruyama, T. & Chakraborty, R. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29: 110.
  • Nicholas, K.B., Nicholas H.B. Jr. & Deerfield D.W. II. 1997. GeneDoc: Analysis and Visualization of Genetic Variation. EMBNEW.NEWS 4: 14.
  • Nichols, R.A. & Freeman K.L.M. 2004. Using molecular markers with high mutation rates to obtain estimates of relative population size and to distinguish the effects of gene flow and mutation: a demonstration using data from endemic Mauritian skinks. Mol. Ecol. 13: 775787.
  • Nielsen, R. & Wakeley, J. 2001. Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics 158: 885896.
  • Pfeiffer, A., Olivieri, A.M. & Morgante, M. 1997. Identification and characterization of microsatellites in Norway spruce (Picea abies K.). Genome 40: 411419.
  • Piry, S., Luikart, G. & Cornuet, J.-M. 1999. BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in effective population size using allele frequency data. J. Hered. 90: 502503.
  • Plessas, M.E. & Strauss, S.H. 1986. Allozyme differentiation among populations, stands, and cohorts in Monterrey pine. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 11551164.
  • Porter, A.H. 2003. A test for deviation from island-model population structure. Mol. Ecol. 12: 903915.
  • Slatkin, M. 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139: 457462.
  • Smith, D.N. & Devey, M.E. 1994. Occurrence and inheritance of microsatellites in Pinus radiata. Genome 37: 977983.
  • Thomas, B.R., Macdonald, S.E., Hicks, M., Adams, D.L. & Hodgetts, R.B. 1999. Effects of reforestation methods on genetic diversity of lodgepole pine: an assessment using microsatellites and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 793801.
  • Van Treuren, R., Bijlsma, R. & Van Delden, W. 1991. The significance of genetic erosin in the process of extinction. 1. Genetic differentiation in Salvia pratensis and Scabiosa columbaria in relation to population size. Heredity 66: 181189.
  • Vitalis, R., Dawson, K. & Boursot, P. 2001. Interpretation of variation across marker loci as evidence of selection. Genetics 158: 18111823.
  • Vogl, C., Karhu, A., Moran, G.F. & Savolainen, O. 2002. High resolution analysis of mating systems: inbreeding in natural populations of Pinus radiata. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 433439.
  • Vogl, C., Das, A., Beaumont, M., Mohanty, S. & Stephan, W. 2003. Population subdivision and molecular sequence variation: theory and analysis of Drosophila ananassae data. Genetics 165: 13851395.
  • Wakeley, J. & Aliacar, N. 2001. Gene genealogies in a metapopulation. Genetics 159: 893905.
  • Watterson, G.A. 1978. The homozygosity test of neutrality. Genetics 88: 405417.
  • Watterson, G.A. 1986. The homozygosity test after a change in population size. Genetics 112: 899907.
  • Weir, B.S. & Cockerham, C.C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 13581370.
  • Wu, J., Krutovskii, K.V. & Strauss, S.H. 1999. Nuclear DNA diversity, population differentiation, and phylogenetic relationships in the California closed-cone pines based on RAPD and allozymes markers. Genome 42: 893908.