SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Benkman, C.G. 1999. The selection mosaic and diversifying coevolution between Crossbills and Lodgepole Pine. Am. Nat. 153: S75S91.
  • Benkman, C.G., Holimon, W.C. & Smith, J.W. 2001. The influence of a competitor on the geographic mosaic of coevolution between crossbills and lodgepole pine. Evolution 55: 282294.
  • Bentler, P.M. 1989. EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. BMDP Statistical Software, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Bishop, J.G. & Schemske, D.W. 1998. Variation in flowering phenology and its consequences for lupines colonizing Mount St. Helens. Ecology 79: 534546.
  • Brody, A.K. 1997. Effects of pollinators, herbivores, and seed predators on flowering phenology. Ecology 78: 16241631.
  • Brody, A.K. & Mitchell, R.J. 1997. Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the hummingbird-pollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 110: 8693.
  • Cariveau, D., Irwin, R.E., Brody, A.K., García-Mayeya, L.S. & von der Ohe, A. 2004. Direct and indirect effects of pollinators and seed predators to selection on plant and floral traits. Oikos 104: 1526.
  • Caruso, C.M. 2000. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 54: 15461557.
  • Conner, J.K. 1996. Understanding natural selection: an approach integrating selection gradients, multiplicative fitness components, and path analysis. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 8: 387397.
  • Conner, J.K. & Rush, S. 1996. Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105: 509516.
  • Conner, J.K., Rush, S. & Jennetten, P. 1996. Measurements of natural selection on floral traits in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). I. Selection through lifetime female fitness. Evolution 50: 11271136.
  • Dudley, S.A. 1996. Differing selection on plant physiological traits in response to environmental water availability: a test of adaptive hypothesis. Evolution 50: 92102.
  • Fedriani, J.M. 2005. Do frugivorous mice choose where or what to feed on?. J. Mamm. 86: 576586.
  • Galen, C. 1996. Rates of floral evolution: adaptation to bumblebee pollination in an alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 50: 120125.
  • Galen, C. & Cuba, J. 2001. Down the tube: pollinators, predators, and the evolution of flower shape in the alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 55: 19631971.
  • Garrido, J.L., Rey, P.J., Cerdá, X. & Herrera, C.M. 2002. Geographical variation in diaspore traits of an ant-dispersed plant (Helleborus foetidus): are ant community composition and diaspore traits correlated? J. Ecol. 90: 446455.
  • Gómez, J.M. 2003. Herbivory reduces the strength of pollinator-mediated selection in the Mediterranean herb Erysimum mediohispanicum: consequences for plant specialization. Am. Nat. 162: 242256.
  • Gómez, J.M. & Zamora, R. 2000. Spatial variation in the selective scenarios of Hormathophylla spinosa (Cruciferae). Am. Nat. 155: 657688.
  • Gómez, J.M. & Zamora, R. 2002. Thorns as induced mechanical defense in a long-lived shrub (Hormathophylla spinosa, Cruciferae). Ecology 83: 885890.
  • Grace, J.B. 2003. Comparing groups using structural equation models. In: Structural Equation Modeling: Applications in Ecological and Evolutionary Biology (B. H.Pugesek, A.Tomer & A.vonEye, eds) pp. 281296 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Gross, J.B., Husband, B.C. & Stewart, S.C. 1998. Phenotypic selection in a natural population of Impatiens pallida Nutt. (Balsamiaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 11: 589609.
  • Herrera, C.M. 1993. Selection on floral morphology and environmental determinants of fecundity in a hawk-moth pollinated violet. Ecol. Monogr. 63: 251275.
  • Herrera, C.M. 2000. Measuring the effects of pollinators and herbivores: evidence for non-additivity in a perennial herb. Ecology 81: 21702176.
  • Herrera, C.M. & Pellmyr, O.E. (eds) 2002. Plant-Animal Interactions. An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
  • Herrera, C.M., Sánchez-Lafuente, A.M., Medrano, M., Guitián, J., Cerdá, X. & Rey, P.J. 2001. Geographical variation in autonomous self-pollination levels unrelated to pollinator service in Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88: 10251032.
  • Herrera, C.M., Medrano, M., Rey, P.J., Sánchez-Lafuente, A.M., García, M.B., Guitián, J. & Manzaneda, A.J. 2002a. Interaction of pollinators and herbivores on plant fitness suggests a pathway for correlated evolution of mutualism- and antagonism-related traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99: 1682316828.
  • Herrera, C.M., Cerdá, X., García, M.B., Guitián, J., Medrano, M., Rey, P.J. & Sánchez-Lafuente, A.M. 2002b. Floral integration, phenotypic covariance structure and pollinator variation in bumblebee-pollinated Helleborus foetidus. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 108121.
  • Holland, J.N. & Fleming, T.H. 1999. Geographic and population variation in pollinating seed-consuming interactions between senita cacti (Lophocereus schottii) and senita moths (Upiga virescens). Oecologia 121: 405410.
  • Holliman, A. & Milton, D. 1990. Helleborus foetidus poisoning of cattle. Vet. Rec. 127: 339340.
  • Irwin, R.E., Adler, L.S. & Brody, A.K. 2004. The dual role of floral traits: pollination attraction and plant defense. Ecology 85: 15031511.
  • Kruuk, L.E.B., Merila, J. & Sheldon, B.C. 2003. When environmental variation short-circuits natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 207209.
  • Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurements of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 12101226.
  • Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. & Wolfinger, R.D. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
  • Manly, B.F.J. 1997. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
  • Mitchell, R.J. 1992. Testing evolutionary and ecological hypotheses using path analysis and structural equation modelling. Funct. Ecol. 6: 123129.
  • Mitchell, R.J. 1993. Path analysis: pollination. In: Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments (S. M.Scheiner & J.Gurevitch, eds), pp. 211231. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Mitchell, R.J. 1994. Effects of floral traits, pollinator visitation, and plant size on Ipomopsis aggregata fruit production. Am. Nat. 143: 870889.
  • Mothershead, K. & Marquis, R.J. 2000. Fitness impacts of herbivory through indirect effects on plant-pollinator interaction in Oenothera macrocarpa. Ecology 81: 3040.
  • Ohashi, K. & Yahara, T. 2000. Effects of flower production and predispersal seed predation on reproduction in Cirsium purpuratum. Can. J. Bot. 78: 230236.
  • Parchman, T.L. & Benkman, C.W. 2002. Diversifying coevolution between Crossbills and Black Spruce on Newfoundland. Evolution 56: 16631672.
  • Pedhazur, E.J. 1982. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinchart and Winston, New York.
  • Quesada, M., Bollman, K. & Stephenson, A.G. 1995. Leaf damage decreases pollen production and hinders pollen performance in Cucurbita texana. Ecology 76: 437443.
  • Rausher, M.D. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariance between trait and fitness. Evolution 46: 616626.
  • Sánchez-Lafuente, A.M. 2002. Floral variation in the generalist perennial herb Paeonia broteroi (Paeoniacea): differences between regions with different pollinators and herbivores. Am. J. Bot. 89: 12601269.
  • SAS Institute 1990. SAS/STAT User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  • SAS Institute 1999. SAS/STAT Software. Changes and Enhancements for Release 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
  • Scheiner, S.M., Mitchell, R.J. & Callahan, H.S. 2000. Using path analysis to measure natural selection. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 423433.
  • Scheiner, S.M., Donohue, K., Dorn, L.A., Mazer, S.J. & Wolfe, L.M. 2002. Reducing environmental bias when measuring natural selection. Evolution 56: 21562167.
  • Shipley, B. 1997. Exploratory path analysis with applications in ecology and evolution. Am. Nat. 149: 11131148.
  • StatSoft 2000. STATISTICA for Windows (Computer Program Manual). StatSoft, Tulsa, OK.
  • Stinchcombe, J.R. & Rausher, M.D. 2002. The evolution of tolerance to deer herbivory: modifications caused by the abundance of insect herbivores. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 12411246.
  • Strauss, S.Y. 1997. Floral characters link herbivores, pollinators, and plant fitness. Ecology 78: 16401645.
  • Strauss, S.Y. & Armbruster, W.S. 1997. Linking herbivory and pollination. New perspectives on plant and animal ecology and evolution. Ecology 79: 16171618.
  • Strauss, S.Y. & Irwin, R.E. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35: 435466.
  • Thompson, J.N. 1994. The Coevolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Thompson, J.N. 1997. Evaluating the dynamics of coevolution among geographically structured populations. Ecology 78: 16191623.
  • Thompson, J.N. 1999. Specific hypothesis on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. Am. Nat. 153: S1S14.
  • Thompson, J.D. 2001. How do visitation patterns vary among pollinators in relation to floral display and floral design in a generalist pollination system? Oecologia 126: 386394.
  • Thompson, J.N. 2002. Plant-animal interactions: future directions. In: Plant-Animal Interactions. An Evolutionary Approach (C. M.Herrera & O. E.Pellmyr, eds), pp. 236247. Blackwell Sciences, Oxford, UK.
  • Thompson, J.N. & Pellmyr, O.E. 1992. Mutualism with pollinating seed parasites amid co-pollinators: constraints on specialization. Ecology 73: 17801791.
  • Travis, J. 1996. The significance of geographical variation in species interactions. Am. Nat. 148: S1S8.
  • Vaughton, G. & Ramsey, M. 1998. Floral display, pollinator visitation and reproductive succes in the dioecious pernnial herb Wurmbea dioica (Liliaceae). Oecologia 115: 93103.
  • Werner, K. & Ebel, F. 1994. Zur Lebensgeschichte der Gattung Helleborus L. (Ranunculaceae). Flora 189: 97130.
  • Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D.F. & Summers, C.F. 1977. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In: Sociological Methodology (D. R.Heise, ed.), pp. 84136. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
  • Wilson, P. & Thomson, J.D. 1996. How do flowers diverge? In: Floral Biology, Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants (D. G.Lloyd & S. C. H.Barret, eds), pp. 82112. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Winn, A.A. 2004. Natural selection, evolvability and bias due to environmental covariance in the field in an annual plant. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 10731083.
  • Young, H.J. & Stanton, M.L. 1990. Influences of floral variation on pollen removal and seed production in wild radish. Ecology 61: 502506.
  • Zangerl, A.R. & Berenbaum, M.R. 2003. Phenotype matching in wild parsnip and parsnip webworms: causes and consequences. Evolution 57: 806815.
  • Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.