SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ashman, T.-L. 1999. Determinants of sex allocation in gynodioecious wild strawberry: implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 648661.
  • Ashman, T.-L. 2003. Constraints on the evolution of males and sexual dimorphism: field estimates of genetic architecture of reproductive traits in three populations of gynodioecious Fragaria virginiana. Evolution 57: 20122025.
  • Asikainen, E. & Mutikainen, P. 2003. Female frequency and relative fitness of females and hermaphrodites in gynodioecious Geranium sylvaticum (Geraniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 90: 226232.
  • Bailey, M.F., Delph, L.F. & Lively, C.M. 2003. Modeling gynodioecy: novel scenarios for maintaining polymorphism. Am. Nat. 161: 762776.
  • Belhassen, E., Dommée, B., Atlan, A., Gouyon, P.H., Pomente, D., Assouad, M.W., & Couvet, D. 1991. Complex determination of male sterility in Thymus vulgaris L.: genetic and molecular analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 137143.
  • Budar, F., Touzet, P. & De Paepe, R. 2003. The nucleo-mitochondrial conflict in cytoplasmic male sterilities revisited. Genetica 117: 316.
  • Byers, D.L., Warsaw, A. and Meagher, T.R. 2005. Consequences of prairie fragmentation on the progeny sex ratio of a gynodioecious species, Lobelia spicata (Campanulaceae). Heredity 95: 6975.
  • Charlesworth, B. and Charlesworth, D. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 112: 975997.
  • Charlesworth, D. & Laporte, V. 1998. The male-sterility polymorphism of Silene vulgaris: Analysis of genetic data from two populations and comparison with Thymus vulgaris. Genetics 150: 12671282.
  • Cornuet, J.M., & Luikart, G. 1996. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144: 20012014.
  • Couvet, D., Ronce, O. & Gliddon, C. 1998. The maintenance of nucleocytoplasmic polymorphism in a metapopulation: the case of gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 152: 5968.
  • Delph, L.F. 1990. Sex-ratio variation in the gynodioecious shrub Hebe strictissima (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 44. 134142.
  • Delph, L.F. 2004. Testing for sex differences in biparental inbreeding and its consequences in a gynodioecious species. Am. J. Bot. 91: 4551.
  • Delph, L.F. & Carroll, S.B. 2001. Factors affecting relative seed fitness and female frequency in a gynodioecious species, Silene acaulis. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3: 487505.
  • Dinnétz, P. 1996. Nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility and population dynamics in Plantago maritima. Doctoral thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
  • Dinnétz, P. 1997. Male sterility, protogyny, and pollen-pistil interference in Plantago maritima (Plantaginaceae), a wind-pollinated, self-incompatible perennial. Am. J. Bot. 84: 15881594.
  • Dinnétz, P. & Jerling, L. 1997. Gynodioecy in Plantago maritima L.; no compensation for loss of male function. Acta Bot. Neer. 46: 193206.
  • Frank, S.A. 1989. The evolutionary dynamics of cytoplasmic male sterility. Am. Nat. 133: 345376.
  • Gouyon, P.-H. & Couvet, D. 1987. A conflict between the two sexes, females and hermaphrodites. In: The Evolution of Sex and its Consequences (S.C.Stearns, ed.), pp. 245261. Birkhäuser, Basel.
  • Gouyon, P.-H., Vichot, F. & Van Damme, J.M.M. 1991. Nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility: single-point equilibria versus limit cycles. Am. Nat. 137: 498514.
  • Hultén, E. & Fries, M. 1986. Atlas of North European vascular plants: north of the Tropic of Cancer I-III. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein.
  • Jacobs, M.S. & Wade, M.J. 2003. A synthetic review of the theory of gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 161, 837851.
  • Jerling, L. 1999. Sea shores. In Swedish Plant Geography (Rydin, H., Snoeijs, P. & Diekmann, M., eds), pp. 169185. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 84.
  • Kaul, M.L.H. 1988. Male Sterility in Higher Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Lewis, D. 1941. Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants. New Phytol. 40: 5663.
  • Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. & Wolfinger, R.D. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
  • Lloyd, D.G. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45: 325339.
  • Manicacci, D., Couvet, D., Belhassen, E., Gouyon, P.-H. & Atlan, A. 1996. Founder effects and sex ratio in the gynodioecious Thymus vulgaris L. Mol. Ecol. 5: 6372.
  • Medrano, M., Alonso, C. & Herrera, C.M. 2005. Mating system, sex ratio, and persistence of females in the gynodioecious shrub Daphne laureola L. (Thymelaeaceae). Heredity 94: 3743.
  • Nei, M., Maruyama, T., & Chakraborty, R. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29: 110.
  • Ronce, O. & Olivieri, I. 2004. Life history evolution in metapopulations. In Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution of Metapopulations (Hanski, I. & O.E.Gaggiotti, eds), pp. 227247. Elsevier Academic Press, Oxford.
  • Ross, M.D. 1970. Breeding systems in Plantago. Heredity 25: 129133.
  • SAS Institute 1997. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
  • Shykoff, J.A., Kolokotronis, S.-O., Collin, C.L. & López-Villavicencio, M. 2003. Effects of male sterility on reproductive traits in gynodioecious plants: a meta-analysis. Oecologia 135: 19.
  • Snoeijs, P. 1999. Marine and brackish waters. In Swedish Plant Geography (Rydin, H., Snoeijs, P. & Diekmann, M., eds.), pp. 187212. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 84.
  • van Damme, J.M.M. & Van Delden, W. 1984. Gynodioecy in Plantago lanceolata L. IV. Fitness components of sex types in different life cycle stages. Evolution 38: 13261336.
  • van Damme, J.M.M. 1992. Selection for maintenance of sex polymorphism in Plantago. In: Plantago – a Multidisciplanary Study. Ecological Studies Vol 89 (Kuiper, P.J.C. & Boss, M., eds.), pp. 204222. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  • Wolfe, L. M. & Shmida, A. 1997. The ecology of sex expression in a gynodioecious Israeli desert shrub (Ochradenus baccatus). Ecology 78: 101110.