SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alberdi, M.T., Prado, J.L. & Ortiz-Jaureguizar, E. 1995. Patterns of body size changes in fossil and living Equini (Perissodactyla). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 54: 349370.
  • Alroy, J. 1998. Cope's rule and the dynamics of body mass evolution in North American fossil mammals. Science 280: 731734.
  • Alroy, J. 2000. Understanding the dynamics of trends within evolving lineages. Paleobiology 26: 319329.
  • Arnold, A.J., Kelly, D.C. & Parker, W.C. 1995. Causality and Cope's rule: evidence from the planktonic foraminifera. J. Paleontol. 69: 203210.
  • Ashton, K.G. 2004. Comparing phylogenetic signal in intraspecific and interspecific body size datasets. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 11571161.
  • Ast, J.C. 2001. Mitochondrial DNA evidence and evolution in Varanoidea (Squamata). Cladistics 17: 211226.
  • Berry, J.F. & Iverson, J.B. 2001a. Kinosternon leucostomum. Cat. Am. Amphib. Rept. 724.
  • Berry, J.F. & Iverson, J.B. 2001b. Kinosternon scorpioides. Cat. Am. Amphib. Rept. 725.
  • Berry, J.F., Seidel, M.E. & Iverson, J.B. 1997. A new species of mud turtle (genus Kinosternon) from Jalisco and Colima, Mexico, with notes on its natural history. Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 2: 329337.
  • Berry, J.F. & Shine, R. 1980. Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in turtles (order Testudines). Oecologia 44: 185191.
  • Blomberg, S.P., Garland, T. & Ives, A.R. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57: 717745.
  • Bromham, L. 2002. Molecular clocks in reptiles: life history influences rate of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 302309.
  • Bromham, L., Rambaut, A. & Harvey, P.H. 1996. Determinants of rate variation in mammalian DNA sequence evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 43: 610621.
  • Bromham, L., Woolfit, M., Lee, M.S.Y. & Rambaut, A. 2002. Testing the relationship between morphological and molecular rates of change along phylogenies. Evolution 56: 19211930.
  • Caccone, A., Gibbs, J.P., Ketmaier, V., Suatoni, E. & Powell, J.R. 1999. Origin and evolutionary relationships of giant Galapagos tortoises. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 1322313228.
  • Chaloner, W.G. & Sheerin, A. 1979. Devonian macrofloras. Spec. Pap. Palaeontol. 23: 145161.
  • Crisp, M.D. & Cook, L.G. 2005. Do early branching lineages signify ancestral traits? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 122128.
  • Crumly, C.R. 1984. The evolution of land tortoises (family Testudinidae). PhD thesis, Rutgers University, New Jersey, USA.
  • Dommergues, J.L., Montuire, S. & Neige, P. 2002. Size patterns through time: the case of the Early Jurassic ammonite radiation. Paleobiology 28: 423434.
  • Duarte, C.M. & Alcaraz, M. 1989. To produce many small or few large eggs: a size-independent reproductive tactic of fish. Oecologia 80: 401404.
  • Dutton, P.H., Davis, S.K., Guerra, T. & Owens, D. 1996. Molecular phylogeny for marine turtles based on sequences of the ND4-leucine tRNA and control regions of mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5: 511521.
  • Edwards, A.W.F. 1972. Likelihood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Eldredge, N. & Gould, S.J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Models in Paleobiology (T. J. M.Schopf, ed.), pp. 82115. Freeman, Cooper and Company, San Francisco.
  • Elgar, M.A. 1990. Evolutionary compromise between a few large and many small eggs: comparative evidence in teleost fish. Oikos 59: 283287.
  • Engstrom, T.N., Shaffer, H.B. & McCord, W.P. 2004. Multiple data sets, high homoplasy and the phylogeny of softshell turtles (Testudines: Trionychidae). Syst. Biol. 53: 693710.
  • Ernst, C.H. 1998. Geochelone chilensis. Cat. Am. Amphib. Rept. 668.
  • Ernst, C.H. & Barbour, R.W. 1989. Turtles of the World. Smithsonian Institution Press, London/Washington, DC.
  • Ernst, C.H. & Leuteritz, T.E.J. 1999. Geochelone carbonaria. Cat. Am. Amph. Rept. 690.
  • Ernst, C.H., Lovich, J.E. & Barbour, R.W. 1994. Turtles of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, London/Washington, DC.
  • Freckleton, R.P., Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of the evidence. Am. Nat. 160: 712726.
  • Fritz, U., Široký, P., Kami, H. & Wink, M. 2005. Environmentally caused dwarfism or a valid species – Is Testudo weissingeri Bour, 1996 a distinct evolutionary lineage? New evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear genomic markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37: 389401.
  • Futuyma, D.J. 1987. On the role of species in anagenesis. Am. Nat. 130: 465473.
  • Futuyma, D.J. 1998. Evolutionary Biology, 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Gaffney, E.S. & Meylan, P.A. 1988. A phylogeny of turtles. In: The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, v.1:Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds (M. J.Benton, ed.), pp. 157220. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Gould, G.C. & MacFadden, B.J. 2004. Gigantism, dwarfism, and Cope's rule: nothing in evolution makes sense without a phylogeny. Am. Mus. Novit. 285: 219237.
  • Gould, S.J. 1997. Cope's rule as psychological artefact. Nature 385: 199200.
  • Hone, D.W.E. & Benton, M.J. 2005. The evolution of large size: how does Cope's rule work? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 46.
  • Hone, D.W.E., Keesey, T.M., Pisani, D. & Purvis, A. 2005. Macroevolutionary trends in the Dinosauria: Cope's rule. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 587595.
  • Iverson, J.B. 1990. Kinosternon alamosae. Cat. Am. Amphib. Rept. 460: 13.
  • Iverson, J.B. 1991. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the evolution of modern kinosternine turtles. Herpetol. Monogr. 5: 127.
  • Iverson, J.B. 1998. Molecules, morphology, and mud turtle phylogenetics (family Kinosternidae). Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 3: 113117.
  • Iverson, J.B. & McCord, W.P. 1992. A new Chinese eyed turtle of the genus Sacalia (Batagurinae, Testudines). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 105: 426432.
  • Iverson, J.B. & McCord, W.P. 1994. Variation in east-Asian turtles of the genus Mauremys (Bataguridae, Testudines). J. Herpetol. 28: 178187.
  • Iverson, J.B. & McCord, W.P. 1997. A new species of Cyclemys (Testudines: Bataguridae) from southeast Asia. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 110: 629639.
  • Iverson, J.B., Balgooyen, C.P., Byrd, K.K. & Lyddan, K.K. 1993. Latitudinal variation in egg and clutch size in turtles. Can. J. Zool. 71: 24482461.
  • Iverson, J.B., Young, C.A. & Berry, J.F. 1998. Kinosternon integrum. Cat. Am. Amph. Rept. 652.
  • Jablonski, D. 1996. Body size and macroevolution. In: Evolutionary Paleobiology (D. H.Erwin, D.Jablonski & J. H.Lipps, eds), pp. 256289. University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London.
  • Jablonski, D. 1997. Body-size evolution in Cretaceous mollusks and the status of Cope's rule. Nature 385: 250252.
  • Joyce, W.G., Parham, J.F. & Gauthier, J.A. 2004. Developing a protocol for the conversion of rank-based taxon names to phylogenetically defined clade names, as exemplified by turtles. J. Paleontol. 78: 9891013.
  • Kingsolver, J.G. & Pfennig, D.W. 2004. Individual-level selection as a cause of Cope's rule of phyletic size increase. Evolution 58: 16081612.
  • Knouft, J.H. & Page, L.M. 2003. The evolution of body size in extant groups of North American freshwater fishes: speciation, size distributions, and Cope's rule. Am. Nat. 161: 413421.
  • Krenz, J.G., Naylor, G.J.P., Shaffer, H.B. & Janzen, F.J. 2005. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution of turtles. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37: 178191.
  • LaBarbera, M. 1986. The evolution and ecology of body size. In: Patterns and Processes in the History of Life (D. M.Raup & D.Jablonski, eds), pp. 6998. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • LaBarbera, M. 1989. Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 97117.
  • Lamb, T. & Lydeard, C. 1994. A molecular phylogeny of the gopher tortoises, with comments on familial relationships within the Testudinoidea. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3: 283291.
  • Laurin, M. 2004. The evolution of body size, Cope's rule and the origin of amniotes. Syst. Biol. 53: 594622.
  • Lehr, E., Fritz, U. & Obst, F.J. 1998. Cuora galbinifrons picturata subsp. nov., eine neue Unterart der Hinterindischen Sharnierschildkröte. Herpetofauna 20: 511.
  • MacFadden, B.J. 1986. Fossil horses from ‘‘Eohippus’’ (Hyracotherium) to Equus: scaling, Cope's law, and the evolution of body size. Paleobiology 12: 355369.
  • Maddison, D.R. & Maddison, W.P. 2000. MacClade, v. 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Maddison, D.R. 1991. Squared-change parsimony reconstructions of ancestral states for continuous-valued characters on a phylogenetic tree. Syst. Zool. 40: 304314.
  • Martin, A.P. & Palumbi, S.R. 1993. Body size, metabolic rate, generation time and the molecular clock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 40874091.
  • Martins, E.P. & Garland, T. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45: 534557.
  • McCord, W.P. & Iverson, J.B. 1991. A new box turtle of the genus Cuora (Testudines, Emydidae) with taxonomic notes and a key to the species. Herpetologica 47: 407420.
  • McCord, W.P. & Iverson, J.B. 1994. A new species of Ocadia (Testudines, Batagurinae) from southwestern China. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 107: 5259.
  • McCord, W.P., Iverson, J.B. & Boeadi1995. A new batagurid turtle from northern Sulawesi, Indonesia. Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 1: 311316.
  • Moll, D. 1994. The ecology of sea beach nesting in slider turtles (Trachemys scripta venusta) from Caribbean Costa Rica. Chelonian Cons. Biol. 1: 107116.
  • Mooers, A.O. & Harvey, P.H. 1994. Metabolic rate, generation time and the rate of molecular evolution in birds. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3: 344350.
  • Near, T.J., Meylan, P.A. & Shaffer, H.B. 2005. Assessing concordance of fossil calibration points in molecular clock studies: an example using turtles. Am. Nat. 165: 137146.
  • Oakley, T.H. & Cunningham, C.W. 2000. Independent contrasts succeed where ancestor reconstruction fails in a known bacteriophage phylogeny. Evolution 54: 397405.
  • Omland, K.E. 1997. Correlated rates of molecular and morphological evolution. Evolution 51: 13811393.
  • Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255: 3745.
  • Pagel, M. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Scr. 26: 331348.
  • Pagel, M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401: 877884.
  • Pagel, M. 2002. Modelling the evolution of continuously varying characters on phylogenetic trees. In: Morphology, Shape, and Phylogeny (N.MacLeod & P. L.Forey, eds), pp. 269286. Taylor & Francis, London/New York.
  • Palkovacs, E.P., Gerlach, J. & Caccone, A. 2002. The evolutionary origin of Indian Ocean tortoises (Dipsochelys). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24: 216227.
  • Parham, J.F., Stuart, B.L., Bour, R. & Fritz, U. 2004. Evolutionary distinctiveness of the extinct Yunnan box turtle (Cuora yunnanensis) revealed by DNA from an old museum specimen. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271: S391S394.
  • Pedrono, M. & Markwell, T. 2001. Maximum size and mass of the ploughshare tortoise, Geochelone yniphora. Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 4: 190.
  • Pianka, E.R. 1995. Evolution of body size: varanid lizards as a model system. Am. Nat. 146: 398414.
  • Polly, P.D. 2001. Paleontology and the comparative method: ancestral node reconstructions versus observed node values. Am. Nat. 157: 596609.
  • Pritchard, P.C.H. 2001. Observations on body size, sympatry, and niche divergence in softshell turtles (Trionychidae). Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 4: 527.
  • Pritchard, P.C.H. & Trebbau, P. 1984. Turtles of Venezuela. Society for the Study of Amphibians & Reptiles, Lawrence, Kansas.
  • Rohlf, F.J., Chang, W.S., Sokal, R.R. & Kim, J. 1990. Accuracy of estimated phylogenies: effects of tree topology and evolutionary model. Evolution 44: 16711684.
  • Schluter, D., Price, T., Mooer, A.O. & Ludwig, D. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51: 16991711.
  • Silva, M. & Downing, J.A. 1995. The allometric scaling of density and body mass: a nonlinear relationship. Am. Nat. 145: 704727.
  • Slowinski, J.B. & Arbogast, B.S. 1999. Is the rate of molecular evolution inversely related to body size? Syst. Biol. 48: 396399.
  • Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman, New York, USA.
  • Spinks, P.Q., Shaffer, H.B., Iverson, J.B. & McCord, W.P. 2004. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the turtle family Geoemydidae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 32: 164182.
  • Stephens, P.R. & Wiens, J.J. 2003a. Ecological diversification and phylogeny of emydid turtles. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 79: 577610.
  • Stephens, P.R. & Wiens, J.J. 2003b. Explaining species richness from continents to communities: the time-for-speciation effect in emydid turtles. Am. Nat. 161: 112128.
  • Swofford, D.L. & Maddison, W.P. 1987. Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony. Math. Biosci. 87: 199229.
  • Van Der Kuyl, A.C., Ballasina, D.L.Ph., Dekker, J.T., Maas, J., Willemsen, R.E. & Goudsmit, J. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships among the species of the genus Testudo (Testudines: Testudinidae) inferred from mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22: 174183.
  • Van Valkenburgh, B., Wang, X. & Damuth, J. 2004. Cope's rule, hypercarnivory, and extinction in North American canids. Science 306: 101104.
  • Walker, D., Orti, G. & Avise, J.C. 1998. Phylogenetic distinctiveness of a threatened aquatic turtle (Sternotherus depressus). Conserv. Biol. 12: 639645.
  • Webster, A.J. & Purvis, A. 2001. Testing the accuracy of methods for reconstructing ancestral states of continuous characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 143149.
  • Yasukawa, Y., Ota, H. & Hikida, T. 1992. Taxonomic re-evaluation of the two subspecies of Geoemyda spengleri spengleri (Gmelin, 1789) (Reptilia: Emydidae). Jpn. J. Herpetol. 14: 143159.