Fluctuating asymmetry and developmental instability in evolutionary biology: past, present and future
Article first published online: 25 JUL 2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01175.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
DONGEN, S. V. (2006), Fluctuating asymmetry and developmental instability in evolutionary biology: past, present and future. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19: 1727–1743. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01175.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 25 JUL 2006
- Article first published online: 25 JUL 2006
- Received 3 April 2006; revised 17 May 2006; accepted 17 May 2006
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- developmental instability;
- evolution;
- fitness;
- fluctuating asymmetry;
- genetic architecture;
- stress
Abstract
The role of developmental instability (DI), as measured by fluctuating asymmetry (FA), in evolutionary biology has been the focus of a wealth of research for more than half a century. In spite of this long period and many published papers, our current state of knowledge reviewed here only allows us to conclude that patterns are heterogeneous and that very little is known about the underlying causes of this heterogeneity. In addition, the statistical properties of FA as a measure of DI are only poorly grasped because of a general lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms that drive DI. If we want to avoid that this area of research becomes abandoned, more efforts should be made to understand the observed heterogeneity, and attempts should be made to develop a unifying statistical protocol. More specifically, and perhaps most importantly, it is argued here that more attention should be paid to the usefulness of FA as a measure of DI since many factors might blur this relationship. Furthermore, the genetic architecture, associations with fitness and the importance of compensatory growth should be investigated under a variety of stress situations. In addition, more focus should be directed to the underlying mechanisms of DI as well as how these processes map to the observable phenotype. These insights could yield more efficient statistical models and a unified approach to the analysis of patterns in FA and DI. The study of both DI and canalization is indispensable to obtain better insights in their possible common origin, especially because both have been suggested to play a role in both micro- and macro-evolutionary processes.

1420-9101/asset/JEB_left.gif?v=1&s=cdd0a87e0640cdbe1b969dbbd029d612b7a1748a)
1420-9101/asset/JEB_right.gif?v=1&s=1566ac71d957297ac097f5a646bcb0098128b801)
