SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arendt, J.D. 1997. Adaptive intrinsic growth rates: an integration across taxa. Q. Rev. Biol. 72: 149177.
  • Barker, M.J., Gruber, S.H., Newman, S.P. & Schluessel, V. 2005. Spatial and ontogenetic variation in growth of nursery-bound juvenile lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris: a comparison of two age-assigning techniques. Env. Biol. Fishes 72: 343355.
  • Begon, M., Mortimer, M. & Thompson, D.J. 1996. Population Ecology, a Unified Study of Animals and Plants, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
  • Billerbeck, J.M., Lankford, T.E. Jr & Conover, D.O. 2001. Evolution of intrinsic growth and energy acquisition rates. I. Trade-offs with swimming performance in Menidia menidia. Evolution 55: 18631872.
  • Biro, P.A., Post, J.R. & Parkinson, E.A. 2003. From individuals to populations: Prey fish risk-taking mediates mortality in whole-system experiments. Ecology 84: 24192431.
  • Biro, P.A., Abrahams, M.V., Post, J.R. & Parkinson, E.A. 2004. Predators select against high growth rates and risk-taking behaviour in domestic trout populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271: 22332237.
  • Blanckenhorn, W.U. 2000. The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Q. Rev. Biol. 75: 385407.
  • Blanckenhorn, W.U., Morf, C., Mühlhäuser, C. & Reusch, T. 1999. Spatiotemporal variation in selection on body size in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 563576.
  • Brodie, E.D. III, Moore, A.J. & Janzen, F.J. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. TREE 10: 313318.
  • Brown, C. & Braithwaite, V.A. 2004. Size matters: a test of boldness in eight populations of the poeciliid Brachyraphis episcopi. Anim. Behav. 68: 13251329.
  • Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Carlson, J.K. & Cortés, E. 2003. Gillnet selectivity of small coastal sharks off the southeastern United States. Fish. Res. 60: 405414.
  • Carlson, S.M. & Letcher, B.H. 2003. Variation in brook and brown trout survival within and among seasons, species, and age classes. J. Fish Biol. 63: 780794.
  • Carlson, S.M., Hendry, A.P. & Letcher, B.H. 2004. Natural selection acting on body size, growth rate and compensatory growth: an empirical test in a wild trout population. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6: 955973.
  • Castro, J.I. 1993. The shark nursery of Bulls Bay, South Carolina, with a review of the shark nurseries of the southeastern coast of the United States. Env. Biol. Fishes 38: 3748.
  • Compagno, L.J.V. 1984. FAO Species Catalogue: Sharks of the World. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  • Cowen, R.K., Paris, C.B. & Srinivasan, A. 2006. Scaling of connectivity in marine populations. Science 311: 522527.
  • De Troch, M., Van Gansbeke, D. & Vincx, M. 2006. Resource availability and meiofauna in sediment of tropical seagrass beds: local versus global trends. Mar. Env. Res. 61: 5973.
  • Edrén, S.M.C. & Gruber, S.H. 2005. Homing ability of young lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris. Env. Biol. Fishes 72: 267281.
  • Endler, J.A. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Fausch, K.D. & White, R.J. 1981. Competition between brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) for positions in a Michigan stream. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 12201227.
  • Feldheim, K.A., Gruber, S.H. & Ashley, M.V. 2001. Population genetic structure of the lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris) in the western Atlantic: DNA microsatellite variation. Mol. Ecol. 10: 295303.
    Direct Link:
  • Feldheim, K.A., Gruber, S.H. & Ashley, M.V. 2002. The breeding biology of lemon sharks at a tropical nursery lagoon. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 16551661.
  • Feldheim, K.A., Gruber, S.H. & Ashley, M.V. 2004. Reconstruction of parental microsatellite genotypes reveals female polyandry and philopatry in the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris. Evolution 58: 23322342.
  • Goodman, S.J. 1998. Patterns of extensive genetic differentiation and variation among European harbor seals (Phoca vitulina vitulina) revealed using microsatellite DNA polymorphisms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 104118.
  • Grant, P.R. & Grant, B.R. 2002. Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science 296: 707711.
  • Gruber, S.H. 1982. Role of the lemon shark as predator in the tropical marine environment: a multidisciplinary study. Fla. Scient. 45: 4675.
  • Gruber, S.H., De Marignac, J.R.C. & Hoenig, J.M. 2001. Survival of juvenile lemon sharks at Bimini, Bahamas, estimated by mark-depletion experiments. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 130: 376384.
  • Hare, M.P., Guenther, C. & Fagan, W.F. 2005. Nonrandom marine dispersal can steepen marine clines. Evolution 59: 25092517.
  • Henderson, P.A., Holmes, R.H.A. & Bamber, R.N. 1988. Size-selective overwintering mortality in the sand smelt, Atherina boyeri Risso, and its role in population regulation. J. Fish Biol. 33: 221233.
  • Hendry, A.P., Day, T. & Cooper, A.B. 2001. Optimal size and number of propagules: allowance for discrete stages and effects of maternal size on total reproductive output and offspring fitness. Am. Nat. 157: 387407.
  • Hendry, A.P., Letcher, B.H. & Gries, G. 2003. Estimating natural selection acting on stream-dwelling Atlantic salmon: implications for the restoration of extirpated populations. Cons. Biol. 17: 795805.
  • Hereford, J., Hansen, T.F. & Houle, D. 2004. Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong? Evolution 58: 21332143.
  • Hersch, E.I. & Phillips, P.C. 2004. Power and potential bias in field studies of natural selection. Evolution 58: 479485.
  • Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hoang, A., Hilt, C.E., Beerli, P. & Kingsolver, J.G. 2001. Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98: 91579160.
  • Hueter, R., Heupel, M.R., Heist, E.J. & Keeney, D.B. 2005. Evidence of philopatry in sharks and implications for the management of shark fisheries. J. Northwest Atl. Fish. Sci. 35: 239247.
  • Jann, P., Blanckenhorn, W.U. & Ward, P.I. 2000. Temporal and microspatial variation in the intensities of natural and sexual selection in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 927938.
  • Janzen, F.J. & Stern, H.S. 1998. Logistic regression for empirical studies of multivariate selection. Evolution 52: 15641571.
  • Juanes, F. & Conover, D.O. 1994. Piscivory and prey size selection in young-of-the-year bluefish: predator preference or size-dependent capture success? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 114: 5969.
  • Kingsolver, J.G. & Pfennig, D.W. 2004. Individual-level selection as a cause of Cope's rule of phyletic size increase. Evolution 58: 16081612.
  • Kingsolver, J.G. & Smith, S.G. 1995. Estimating selection on quantitative traits using capture-recapture data. Evolution 49: 384388.
  • Kingsolver, J.G., Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hill, C.E., Hoang, A., Gilbert, P. & Beerli, P. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157: 245261.
  • Kinnison, M.T. & Hendry, A.P. 2001. The pace of modern life II: from rates of contemporary microevolution to pattern and process. Genetica 112–113: 145164.
  • Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 12101226.
  • Lankford, T.E. Jr., Billerbeck, J.M. & Conover, D.O. 2001. Evolution of intrinsic growth and energy acquisition rates. II. Trade-offs with vulnerability to predation in Menidia menidia. Evolution 55: 18731881.
  • Lebreton, J.D., Burnham, K.P., Clobert, J. & Anderson, D.R. 1992. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marker animals – a unified approach with case studies. Ecol. Monograph 62: 67118.
  • Letcher, B.H., Horton, G.E., Dubreuil, T.L. & O'Donnell, M.J. 2005. A field test of the extent of bias in selection estimates after accounting for emigration. Evol. Ecol. Res. 7: 643650.
  • Mangel, M. & Stamps, J. 2001. Trade-offs between growth and mortality and the maintenance of individual variation in growth. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3: 583593.
  • Manire, C.H. & Gruber, S.H. 1991. Effect of M-type dart tags on field growth of juvenile lemon sharks. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 120: 776780.
  • Martel, G. & Dill, L.M. 1995. Influence of movement by coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) parr on their detection by common mergansers (Mergus merganser). Ethol. 99: 139149.
  • McAdam, A.G. & Boutin, S. 2003. Variation in viability selection among cohorts of juvenile red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus). Evolution 57: 16891697.
  • Mitchell-Olds, T. & Shaw, R.G. 1987. Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41: 11491161.
  • Morrissey, J.F. & Gruber, S.H. 1993. Habitat selection by juvenile lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris. Env. Biol. Fishes 38: 311319.
  • Newman, S.P. & Gruber, S.H. 2002. Comparison of mangrove and seagrass fish and macroinvertebrate communities in Bimini. Bahamas J. Sci. 9: 1927.
  • Palsbøll, P.J., Clapham, P.J. & Mattila, D.K. 1995. Distribution of mtDNA haplotypes in North Atlantic humpback whales: the influence of behaviour on population structure. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 116: 110.
  • Parker, R.R. 1971. Size selective predation among juvenile salmonid fishes in a British Columbia inlet. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 28: 15031510.
  • Pratt, H.L. Jr. & Casey, J.G. 1990. Shark reproductive strategies as a limiting factor in directed fisheries, with a review of Holden's method of estimating growth- parameters. In: Elasmobranchs as Living Resources (L. H.Pratt, S.Gruber & Y.Taniuchi, eds), NOAA Technical Report 90, pp. 97109, U.S. Dept. Comm, Washington.
  • Przybylo, R., Sheldon, B.C. & Merilä, J. 2000. Patterns of natural selection on morphology of male and female collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59: 213232.
  • Quinn, T.P., Hendry, A.P. & Buck, G.B. 2001. Balancing natural and sexual selection in sockeye salmon: interactions between body size, reproductive opportunity, and vulnerability to predation by bears. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3: 917937.
  • Roff, D.A. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories: Theory and Analysis. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Rowe, D.K. & Thorpe, J.E. 1990. Differences in growth between maturing and non-maturing male Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., parr. J. Fish Biol. 36: 643658.
  • Schluter, D. 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42: 849861.
  • Schluter, D. 2000. http://www.zoology.ubc.ca/~schluter/splines.html .
  • Schluter, D., Price, T.D. & Rowe, L. 1991. Conflicting selection pressures and life history trade-offs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 246: 1117.
  • Schulte-Hostedde, A.I., Zinner, B., Millar, J.S. & Hickling, G.J. 2005. Restitution of mass-size residuals: validating body condition indices. Ecology 86: 155163.
  • Sinclair, A.F., Swain, D.P. & Hanson, J.M. 2002. Measuring changes in the direction and magnitude of size-selective mortality in a commercial fish population. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59: 361371.
  • Sogard, S.M. 1997. Size-selective mortality in the juvenile stage of teleost fishes: A review. Bull. Mar. Sci. 60: 11291157.
  • Sundström, L.F., Löhmus, M. & Devlin, R.H. 2005. Selection of increased intrinsic growth rates in coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Evolution 59: 15601569.
  • West, C.J. & Larkin, P.A. 1987. Evidence for size-selective mortality of juvenile sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in Babine Lake, British Columbia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44: 712.
  • White, G.C. & Burnham, K.P. 1999. Program MARK: Survival estimation form populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46: 120138.
  • Zabel, R.W. & Achord, S. 2004. Relating size of juveniles to survival within and among populations of chinook salmon. Ecology 85: 795806.