SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arctander, P. 1988. Comparative studies on avian DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis: convenient procedures based on blood samples from live birds. J. Ornithol. 129: 205216.
  • Arnqvist, G. & Nilsson, T. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60: 145164.
  • Begon, M.E., Townsend, C.R. & Harper, J.L. 2005. Ecology. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Bensch, S., Price, T. & Kohn, J. 1997. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in a Phylloscopus warbler. Mol. Ecol. 6: 9192.
  • Birkhead, T.R. 1998. Sperm competition in birds. Rev. Reprod. 3: 123129.
  • Charmantier, A., Blondel, J., Perret, P. & Lambrechts, M.M. 2004. Do extra-pair paternities provide genetic benefits for female blue tits Parus caeruleus? J. Avian Biol. 35: 524532.
  • Dietrich, V. 2001. Zum Auftreten alternativer Fortpflanzungsstrategien in einer Lingener Population der Tannenmeise (Parus ater). Diploma thesis, Zoological Institute, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany, 82 pp.
  • Dietrich, V., Schmoll, T., Winkel, W., Epplen, J.T. & Lubjuhn, T. 2004. Pair identity – an important factor concerning variation in extra-pair paternity in the coal tit (Parus ater). Behaviour 141: 817835.
  • Dixon, A., Ross, D., Omalley, S.L.C. & Burke, T. 1994. Paternal investment inversely related to degree of extra-pair paternity in the reed bunting. Nature 371: 698700.
  • Double, M.C., Dawson, D., Burke, T. & Cockburn, A. 1997. Finding the fathers in the least faithful bird: a microsatellite-based genotyping system for the superb fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus. Mol. Ecol. 6: 691693.
  • Fossøy, F., Johnson, A. & Lifjeld, J.T. 2006. Evidence of obligate female promiscuity in a socially monogamous passerine. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60: 255259.
  • Glutz von Blotzheim, U.N. & Bauer, K.M. 1993. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Aula, Wiesbaden.
  • Griffith, S.C., Stewart, I.R.K., Dawson, D.A., Owens, I.P.F. & Burke, T. 1999. Contrasting levels of extra-pair paternity in mainland and island populations of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): is there an ‘island effect’? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68: 303316.
  • Griffith, S.C., Owens, I.P.F. & Thuman, K.A. 2002. Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol. Ecol. 11: 21952212.
  • Jamieson, A. 1994. The effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members. Anim. Genet. 25: 3744.
  • Jeffreys, A.J., Allen, M.J., Hagelberg, E. & Sonnberg, A. 1992. Identification of the Skeletal Remains of Mengele, Josef by DNA Analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 56: 6576.
  • Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75: 2164.
  • Lubjuhn, T. & Sauer, K.P. 1999. DNA fingerprinting and profiling in behavioural ecology. In: DNA Profiling and DNA Fingerprinting (J. T.Epplen & T.Lubjuhn, eds), pp. 3952. Birkhäuser, Basel.
  • Lubjuhn, T., Curio, E., Muth, S.C., Brün, J. & Epplen, J.T. 1993. Influence of extra-pair paternity on parental care in great tits (Parus major). In: DNA Fingerprinting: State of the Science (S. D. J.Pena, R.Chakraborty, J. T.Epplen & A. J.Jeffreys, eds), pp. 379385. Birkhäuser, Basel.
  • Lubjuhn, T., Gerken, T., Brün, J. & Epplen, J.T. 1999a. High frequency of extra-pair paternity in the coal tit. J. Avian Biol. 30: 229233.
  • Lubjuhn, T., Strohbach, S., Brün, J., Gerken, T. & Epplen, J.T. 1999b. Extra-pair paternity in great tits (Parus major) – a long term study. Behaviour 136: 11571172.
  • Marshall, T.C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L.E.B. & Pemberton, J.M. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7: 639655.
  • Michl, G., Torok, J., Griffith, S.C. & Sheldon, B.C. 2002. Experimental analysis of sperm competition mechanisms in a wild bird population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99: 54665470.
  • Møller, A.P. & Jennions, M.D. 2001. How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften 88: 401415.
  • Mund, V. 2005. Fremdvaterschaften bei der sozial monogamen Tannenmeise (Parus ater): Was macht Fremdkopulationspartner für Weibchen attraktiv? Diploma thesis, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany, 82 pp.
  • Neff, B.D. & Pitcher, T.E. 2005. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol. Ecol. 14: 1938.
  • Otter, K., Ratcliffe, L., Michaud, D. & Boag, P.T. 1998. Do female black-capped chickadees prefer high-ranking males as extra-pair partners? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43: 2536.
  • R Development Core Team. 2005. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org
  • Rigby, R.A. & Stasinopoulos, D.M. 2005. Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. J. R. Stat. Soc. C 54: 507544.
  • Schmoll, T., Janzon, V., Epplen, J.T. & Lubjuhn, T. 2003. Extra-pair sires as identified by means of standardized across-gel comparisons in multilocus DNA fingerprints. Electrophoresis 24: 27582763.
  • Schmoll, T., Dietrich, V., Winkel, W. & Lubjuhn, T. 2004. Blood-sampling does not affect fledging success and fledgling local recuitment in coal tits (Parus ater). J. Ornithol. 145: 7980.
  • Schmoll, T., Dietrich, V., Winkel, W., Epplen, J.T., Schurr, F. & Lubjuhn, T. 2005. Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine. Evolution 59: 645657.
  • Stiels, D. 2004. Etablierung von Mikrosatellitensystemen zur Elternschaftsanalyse bei Tannenmeisen (Parus ater). Diploma thesis, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany, 77 pp.
  • Valera, F., Hoi, H. & Kristin, A. 2003. Male shrikes punish unfaithful females. Behav. Ecol. 14: 403408.
  • Westneat, D.F. 1990. Genetic parentage in the Indigo Bunting: a study using DNA fingerprinting. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27: 6776.
  • Yasui, Y. 1998. The ‘genetic benefits’ of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 246250.
  • Yasui, Y. 2001. Female multiple mating as a genetic bet-hedging strategy when mate choice criteria are unreliable. Ecol. Res. 16: 605616.