SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Albert, A. & Schluter, D. 2004. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection? Evolution 58: 10991107.
  • Beltrán, M., Jiggins, C.D., Bull, V., Linares, M., Mallet, J., McMillian, W.O. & Bermingham, E. 2002. Phylogenetic discordance at the species boundary: comparative gene genealogies among rapidly radiating Heliconius butterflies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 21762190.
  • Broughton, R. & Harrison, R.G. 2003. Nuclear gene genealogies reveal historical, demographic and selective factors associated with speciation in field crickets. Genetics 163: 13891401.
  • Brower, A.V.Z. 1994. Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91: 64916495.
  • Butlin, R.K. 1987a. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 2: 813.
  • Butlin, R.K. 1987b. Species, speciation, and reinforcement. Am. Nat. 130: 461464.
  • Butlin, R.K. 1989. Reinforcement of premating isolation. In: Speciation and Its Consequences (D.Otte & J. A.Endler, eds), pp. 158179. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution. 43: 673691.
  • Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 1997. “Patterns of speciation in Drosophila” revisited. Evolution. 54: 216621.
  • Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Dopman, E.B., Perez, L., Bogdanowicz, S.M. & Harrison, R.G. 2005. Consequences of reproductive barriers for genealogical discordance in the European corn borer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102: 1470614711.
  • Dumont, H.J., Vanfleteren, J.R., DeJonckheere, J.F. & Weekers, P.H.H. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships, divergence time estimation, and global biogeographic patterns of Calopterygoid Damselflies (Odonata, Zygoptera) inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences. Syst. Biol. 54: 347362.
  • Futuyma, D.J. 1998. Evolutionary Biology, 3rd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Goldman, N., Anderson, J.P. & Rodrigo, A.G. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49: 652670.
  • Hey, J. & Nielson, R. 2004. Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics. 167: 747760.
  • Higgens, D.G., Thompson, J.D. & Gibson, T.J. 1996. Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments. Methods Enzymol 226: 382402.
  • Hoskin, C.J., Higgie, H., McDonald, K.R. & Moritz, C. 2005. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 437: 13531356.
  • Howard, D.J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (R. G.Harrison, ed.), pp. 4669. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Huelsenbeck, J.P., Hillis, D.M. & Jones, R. 1995. Parametric bootstrapping in molecular phylogenetics: applications and performance. In: Molecular Zoology: Advances, Strategies, and Protocols (J. D.Ferraris & S. R.Palumbi, eds), pp. 1945. Wiley Press, New York.
  • Huelsenbeck, J.P., Hillis, D.M. & Nielsen, R. 1996. A likelihood-ratio test of monophyly. Syst. Biol. 45: 546558.
  • Hurst, G.D.D. & Jiggins, F.M. 2005. Problems with mitochondrial DNA as a marker in population, phylogeographic, and phylogenetic studies: the effects of inherited symbionts. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272: 15251534.
  • Kelly, J.K. & Noor, M.A.F. 1996. Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics 143: 14851497.
  • Kirkpatrick, M. & Ravigné, V. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159: S22S35.
  • Kliman, R.M., Andolfatto, P., Coyne, J.A., Depaulis, F., Kreitman, M., Berry, A.J., McCarter, J., Wakeley, J. & Hey, J. 2000. The population genetics of the origin and divergence of the Drosophila simulans complex species. Genetics 156: 19131931.
  • Lemmon, A.R., Smadja, C. & Kirkpatrick, M. 2004. Reproductive character displacement is not the only outcome of reinforcement. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 177183.
  • Liou, L.W. & Price, T.D. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of prezygotic isolation. Evolution 48: 14511459.
  • Machado, C.A. & Hey, J. 2003. The causes of phylogenetic conflict in a classic Drosophila species group. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 270: 11931202.
  • Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2004. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 1.05. URL http://mesquiteproject.org/mesquite/mesquite.html.
  • Misof, B., Anderson, C.L. & Hadrys, H. 2000. A phylogeny of the damselfly genus Calopteryx (Odonata) using mitochondrial 16s rDNA markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 15: 514.
  • Monteiro, A. & Pierce, N. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of Bicyclus butterflies (Satyridae) using COI, COII, and EF1α. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18: 264281.
  • Nielsen, R. & Wakeley, J. 2001. Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics 158: 885896.
  • Noor, M.A.F. 1995. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375: 674675.
  • Noor, M.A.F. 1999. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83: 503508.
  • Noor, M.A.F., Johnson, N.A. & Hey, J. 2000. Gene flow between Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Evolution 54: 21742175.
  • Noor, M.A.F., Grams, K.L., Bertucci, L.A., Almendarez, Y., Reiland, J. & Smith, K.R. 2001. The genetics of reproductive isolation and the potential for gene exchange between Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis via backcross hybrid males. Evolution 55: 512521.
  • Nosil, P., Crespi, B.J. & Sandoval, C.P. 2003. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 270: 19111919.
  • Otte, D. 1989. Speciation in Hawaiian crickets. In: Speciation and Its Consequences. (D.Otte & J.Endler eds), pp. 483526. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Pfenning, K.S. 2003. A test of alternative hypotheses for the evolution of reproductive isolation between spadefoot toads: support for the reinforcement hypothesis. Evolution 57: 28422851.
  • Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14: 817–818.
  • Rice, J.A. 1995. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
  • Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 15721574.
  • Rundle, H.D. & Schulter, D. 1998. Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52: 200208.
  • Saetre, G.-P., Moum, T., Bures, S., Kral, M., Adamjan, M. & Moreno, J. 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387: 589592.
  • Servedio, M.R. 2004. The what and why of research of reinforcement. PLoS Biol. 2: e420 (2032–2035).
  • Servedio, M.R. & Kirkpatrick, M. 1997. The effects of gene flow on reinforcement. Evolution 51: 17641772.
  • Servedio, M.R. & Noor, M.A.F. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34: 339364.
  • Smith, B. & Wilson, J.B. 2002. Community convergence: ecological and evolutionary. Folia Geobot. 37: 171183.
  • Swofford, D.L. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony (* and other Methods), version 4.0b 10. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Swofford, D.L., Olson, G.J., Waddell, P.J. & Hillis, D.M. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Molecular Systematics (D. M.Hillis, C.Moritz & B. K.Mable eds), pp. 407514. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Takahata, N. & Slatkin, M. 1984. Mitochondrial gene flow. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81: 17641767.
  • Templeton, A.R. 1981. Mechanisms of speciation – a population genetics approach. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 2348.
  • Ting, C.-T., Tsaur, S.-C. & Wu, C.-I. 2000. The phylogeny of closely related species as revealed by the genealogy of a speciation gene, Odysseus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97: 53135316.
  • Tynkkynen, K., Rantala, M.J. & Suhonen, J. 2004. Interspecific aggression and character displacement in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 759767.
  • Tynkkynen, K., Kotiaho, J.S., Luojumaki, M. & Suhonen, J. 2005. Interspecific aggression causes negative selection on sexual characters. Evolution 59: 18381843.
  • Waage, J.K. 1975. Reproductive isolation and the potential for character displacement in the damselflies, Calopteryx maculata and C. aequabilis (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Syst. Zool. 24: 2436.
  • Waage, J.K. 1979. Reproductive character displacement in Calopteryx (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Evolution 33: 104116.
  • Wang, R.L., Wakeley, J. & Hey, J. 1997. Gene flow and natural selection in the origins of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives. Genetics 147: 10911106.
  • Willett, C.S., Ford, M.J. & Harrison, R.G. 1999. Inferences about the origin of a field cricket hybrid zone from a mitochondrial DNA phylogeny. Heredity 79: 484494.