SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Astles, P.A., Moore, A.J. & Preziosi, R.F. 2005. A comparison of methods to estimate cross-environment genetic correlations. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 114122.
  • Ballabeni, P. & Rahier, M.. 2000. Performance of leaf beetle larvae on sympatric host and non-host plants. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 97: 175181.
  • Ballabeni, P., Gotthard, K., Kayumba, A. & Rahier, M. 2003. Local adaptation and ecological genetics of host–plant specialization in a leaf beetle. Oikos 101: 7078.
  • Barton, N.H. & Turelli, M. 1989. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? Annu. Rev. Genet. 23: 337370.
  • Begin, M. & Roff, D.A. 2004. From micro- to macroevolution through quantitative genetic variation: positive evidence from field crickets. Evolution 58: 22872304.
  • Berlocher, S.H. & Feder, J.L. 2002. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 773815.
  • Bernays, E.A. & Chapman, R.F. 1978. Plant chemistry and acridoid feeding behavior. In: Coevolution of Plants and Animals (J. B.Harborne, ed.), pp. 100141. Academic Press, New York.
  • Bernays, E.A. & Chapman, R.F. 1994. Host–Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  • Blows, M.W. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2005. A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology 86: 13711384.
  • Blows, M.W., Chenoweth, S. & Hine, E. 2004. Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually-selected traits. Am. Nat. 163: 329340.
  • Bossart, J.L. 2003. Covariance of preference and performance on normal and novel hosts in a locally monophagous and locally polyphagous butterfly population. Oecologia 135: 477486.
  • Bradshaw, A.D. 1991. Genostasis and the limits to evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci. 333: 289305.
  • Brues, C.T. 1924. The specificity of food-plants in the evolution of phytophagous insects. Am. Nat. 58: 127144.
  • Camara, M.D. 1997. A recent host range expansion in Junonia coenia Hübner (Nymphalidae): oviposition preference, survival, growth, and chemical defense. Evolution 51: 873884.
  • Casagrande, R.A. 1985. The ‘‘Iowa’’ potato beetle, its discovery and spread to potato. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 31: 2729.
  • Castillo-Chávez, C., Levin, S.A. & Gould, F. 1988. Physiological and behavioral adaptation to varying environments: a mathematical model. Evolution 31: 568579.
  • Dethier, V.G. 1954. Evolution of feeding preferences in phytophagous insects. Evolution 8: 3354.
  • Dickens, J.C. 2006. Plant volatiles moderate response to aggregation pheromone in Colorado potato beetle. J. App. Entomol. 130: 2631.
  • Du, Y.J., Van Loon, J.J.A. & Renwick, J.A.A. 1995. Contact chemoreception of oviposition-stimulating glucosinolates and an oviposition-deterrent cardenolide in 2 subspecies of Pieris napi. Physiol. Entomol. 20: 164174.
  • Ehrlich, P.R. & Raven, P.H. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586608.
  • Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • Feeny, P. 1992. The evolution of chemical ecology: contributions from the study of herbivorous insects. In: Herbivores: Their Interactions With Secondary Plant Metabolites (G. A.Rosenthal & M. R.Berenbaum, eds), pp. 144. Academic Press, New York.
  • Fisher, R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Forister, M.L. 2005. Independent inheritance of preference and performance in hybrids between host races of Mitoura butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Evolution 59: 11491155.
  • Fox, C.W. & Lalonde, R.G. 1993. Host confusion and the evolution of diet breadths. Oikos 67: 577581.
  • Fry, J.D. 1990. Trade-offs in fitness on different hosts: evidence from a selection experiment with a phytophagous mite. Am. Nat. 136: 569580.
  • Fry, J.D. 1992. The mixed-model analysis of variance applied to quantitative genetics: biological meaning of the parameters. Evolution 46: 540550.
  • Fry, J.D. 1996. The evolution of host specialization: are tradeoffs overrated? Am. Nat. 148: S84S107.
  • Fry, J.D. 2004. Estimation of genetic variances and covariances by restricted maximum likelihood using PROC MIXED. In: Genetic Analysis of Complex Traits Using SAS (A. M.Saxton, ed.), pp. 1134. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  • Futuyma, D.J. in press. Sympatric speciation in herbivorous insects: norm or exception? In: Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation – The Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects (K.Tilmon, ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Futuyma, D.J. & Moreno, G. 1988. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19: 207233.
  • Futuyma, D.J., Keese, M.C. & Funk, D.J. 1995. Genetic constraints on macroevolution: the evolution of host affiliation in the leaf beetle genus Ophraella. Evolution 49: 797809.
  • Hare, J.D. 1983. Seasonal variation in plant-insect associations: utilization of Solanum dulcamara by Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Ecology 64: 345361.
  • Hare, J.D. 1990. Ecology and management of the Colorado potato beetle. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35: 81100.
  • Hare, J.D. & Kennedy, G.G. 1986. Genetic variation in plant-insect associations: survival of Leptinotarsa decemlineata populations on Solanum carolinense. Evolution 40: 10311043.
  • Harrison, G.D. & Mitchell, B.K. 1988. Host-plant acceptance by geographic populations of the Colorado potato beetle. J. Chem. Ecol. 14: 777778.
  • Hill, W.G. & Thompson, R. 1978. Probabilities of non-positive definite between-group or genetic covariance matrices. Biometrics 34: 429439.
  • Hoffmann, A.A. & Parsons, P.A. 1991. Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Hoffmann, A.A., Hallas, R., Dean, J. & Schiffer, M. 2003. Low potential for climatic stress adaptation in a rainforest Drosophila species. Science 301: 100102.
  • Horton, D.R. & Redak, R.A. 1993. Further comments on analysis of covariance in insect dietary studies. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 69: 263275.
  • Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195204.
  • Hsiao, T.H. 1974. Chemical influence on feeding behavior of Leptinotarsa beetles. In: Experimental Analysis of Insect Behavior (L.Barton Browne, ed.), pp. 237248. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Hsiao, T.H. 1978. Host plant adaptations among geographic populations of the Colorado potato beetle. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24: 237247.
  • Hsiao, T.H. 1985. Ecophysiological and genetic aspects of geographic variations in the Colorado potato beetle. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Colorado Potato Beetle, XVIIth International Congress of Entomology (D. N.Ferro & R. H.Voss, eds), Mass. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 704, 6377.
  • Hsiao, T.H. 1986. Specificity of certain chrysomelid beetles for Solanaceae. In: Solanaceae: Biology and Systematics, Second International Symposium (W. G.D'Arcy, ed.), pp. 345363. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Hsiao, T.H. 1988. Host specificity, seasonality and bionomics of Leptinotarsa beetles. In: Biology of Chrysomelidae (P.Jolivet, E.Petitpierrs & T. H.Hsiao, eds), pp. 581599. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
  • Iriarte, P.F. & Hasson, E. 2000. The role of the use of different host plants in the maintenance of the inversion polymorphism in the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii. Evolution 54: 12951302.
  • Jacques, R.L.J. 1988. The Potato Beetles. E. J. Brill, New York.
  • Jaenike, J. 1990. Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 243273.
  • Jermy, T. 1994. Hypotheses on oligophagy: how far the case of the Colorado potato beetle supports them. In: Novel Aspects of the Biology of Chrysomelidae (P. H.Jolivet, M. L.Cox & E.Petitpierre, eds), pp. 127139. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
  • Joshi, A. & Thompson, J.N. 1995. Trade-offs and the evolution of host specialization. Evol. Ecol. 9: 8292.
  • Keese, M.C. 1998. Performance of two monophagous leaf feeding beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on each other's host plant: do intrinsic factors determine host plant specialization? J. Evol. Biol. 11: 403419.
  • Latheef, M.A. & Harcourt, D.G. 1972. A quantitative study of food consumption, assimilation, and growth in Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on two host plants. Can. Entomol. 104: 12711276.
  • Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. & Wolfinger, R.D.. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
  • Lu, W. & Logan, P. 1994a. Geographic variation in larval feeding acceptance and performance of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87: 460469.
  • Lu, W. & Logan, P. 1994b. Genetic variation in oviposition between and within populations of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelideae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87: 634640.
  • Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and the Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • MacKenzie, A. 1996. A trade-off for host plant utilization in the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae. Evolution 50: 155162.
  • McGuigan, K., Chenoweth, S.F. & Blows, M.W. 2005. Phenotypic divergence along lines of genetic variance. Am. Nat. 165: 3243.
  • Mezey, J.G. & Houle, D. 2005. The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59: 10271038.
  • Milanović, D. & Gliksman, I. 2004. Selection responses and quantitative-genetic analysis of preadult performance on two host plants in the bean weevil, Acanthoscelides obtectus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 113: 125133.
  • Mitchell, B.K. 1994. The chemosensory basis of host–plant recognition in Chrysomelidae. In: Novel Aspects of the Biology of Chrysomelidae (P. H.Jolivet, M. L.Cox & E.Petitpierre, eds), pp. 141151. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
  • Mitter, C., Farrell, B. & Futuyma, D.J. 1991. Phylogenetic studies of insect-plant interactions: insights into the genesis of diversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 290293.
  • Moran, M.D. 2003. Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100: 403405.
  • Müller, C. & Renwick, J.A.A. 2001. Different phagostimulants in potato foliage for Manduca sexta and Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Chemoecology 11: 3741.
  • Ng, D. 1988. A novel level of interactions in plant–insect systems. Nature 334: 611613.
  • Orr, H.A. 2000. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54: 1320.
  • Phillips, P.C. 1998. Designing experiments to maximize the power of detecting correlations. Evolution 52: 251255.
  • Raubenheimer, D. & Simpson, S.J. 1992. Analysis of covariance: an alternative to nutritional indices. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 62: 221231.
  • Rausher, M.D. 1993. The evolution of habitat preference: avoidance and adaptation. In: Evolution of Insect Pests: Patterns of Variation (K. C.Kim & B. A.McPheron, eds), pp. 259283. Wiley, New York.
  • Renwick, J.A.A. 2002. The chemical world of crucivores: lures, treats and traps. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 104: 3542.
  • Renwick, J.A.A., Zhang, W.Q., Haribal, M., Attygalle, A.B. & Lopez, K.D. 2001. Dual chemical barriers protect a plant against different larval stages of an insect. J. Chem. Ecol. 27: 15751583.
  • Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50: 17661774.
  • Schluter, D. 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Schoonhoven, L.M., Van Loon, J.J.A. & Dicke, M. 2005. Insect–Plant Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Singer, M.C., Ng, D. & Thomas, C.D. 1988. Heritability of oviposition preference and its relationship to offspring performance within a single insect population. Evolution 42: 977985.
  • Solarz, S.L. & Newman, R.M. 2001. Variation in hostplant preference and performance by the milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz, exposed to native and exotic watermilfoils. Oecologia 126: 6672.
  • Thompson, J.N. 1988. Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 47: 134.
  • Thompson, J.N. 1996. Trade-offs in larval performance on normal and novel hosts. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 80: 133139.
  • Thompson, J.N. & Pellmyr, O. 1991. Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36: 6589.
  • Tilmon, K.J., Wood, T.K. & Pesek, J.D. 1998. Genetic variation in performance traits and the potential for host shifts in Enchenopa treehoppers (Homoptera: Membracidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91: 397403.
  • Tosh, C.R., Morgan, D., Walters, K.F.A. & Douglas, A.E. 2004. The significance of overlapping plant range to a putative adaptive trade-off in the black bean aphid Aphis fabae Scop. Ecol. Entomol. 29: 488497.
  • Tower, W.D. 1906. An Investigation of Evolution in Chrysomelid Beetles of the Genus Leptinotarsa. Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington, DC.
  • Tucić, N., Mikuljanac, S. & Stojković, O. 1997. Genetic variation and covariation among life history traits in populations of Acanthoscelides obtectus maintained on different hosts. Entomol. Exp. App. 85: 247256.
  • Ueno, H., Hasegawa, Y., Fujiyama, N. & Katakura, H. 2001. Comparison of genetic variation in growth performance on normal and novel host plants in a local population of a herbivorous ladybird beetle, Epilachna vigintioctomaculata. Heredity 87: 17.
  • Ueno, H., Fujiyama, N., Yao, I., Sato, Y. & Katakura, H. 2003. Genetic architecture for normal and novel host–plant use in two local populations of the herbivorous ladybird beetle, Epilachna pustulosa. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 883895.
  • Via, S. & Lande, R. 1985. Genotype–environment interactions and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39: 505522.
  • Visser, J.H. 1983. Differential sensory perceptions of plant compounds by insects. In: Plant Resistance to Insects. ACS Symposium Series 208 (P. A.Hedino, ed.), pp. 215230. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
  • Wade, M.J. 1994. The biology of the imported willow leaf beetle, Plagiodera versicolora (Laicharting). In: Novel Aspects of the Biology of the Chrysomelidae (P. H.Jolivet, M. L.Cox & E.Petitpierre, eds), pp. 541547. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
  • Wagner, G.P. 1988. The influence of variation and of developmental constraints on the rate of multivariate phenotypic evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 1: 4566.
  • Wagner, G.P. & Altenberg, L. 1996. Complex adaptations and evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50: 967976.
  • Wiens, J.J. & Graham, C.H. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 519539.
  • Windig, J.J. 1997. The calculation and significance testing of genetic correlations across environments. J. Evol. Biol. 10: 853874.