SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Second International Symposium on Information Theory (B. N.Petrov & F.Caski, eds), pp. 267281. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
  • Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 19: 716723.
  • Alexander, R.D. 1974. The evolution of social behavior. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 5: 325383.
  • Bellinato, F. & Bogliani, G. 1995. Colonial breeding imposes increased predation: experimental studies with herons. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 7: 347353.
  • Birkhead, T.R. & Hudson, P.J. 1977. Population parameters for Common Guillemot Uria aalge. Ornis Scand. 8: 145154.
  • Birkhead, T.R. & Nettleship, D.N. 1995. Arctic fox influence on a seabird community in Labrador – a natural experiment. Wilson Bull 107: 397412.
  • Bretagnolle, V., Attié, C. & Pasquet, E. 1998. Cytochrome-b evidence for validity and phylogenetic relationships of Pseudobulweria and Bulweria (Procellariidae). Auk 115: 188195.
  • Brown, C.R. & Brown, M.B. 1987. Group-living in Cliff Swallows as an advantage in avoiding predators. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21: 97107.
  • Brown, C.R. & Brown, M.B. 1996. Coloniality in the Cliff Swallow: The Effect of Group Size on Social Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Brown, C.R. & Brown, M.B. 2001. Avian coloniality. Progress and problems. In: Current Ornithology, Vol. 16 (V.Nolan & C.F.Thompson eds), pp. 182. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
  • Brown, C.R., Brown, M.B. & Danchin, E. 2000. Breeding habitat selection in cliff swallows: the effect of conspecific reproductive success on colony choice. J. Anim. Ecol. 69: 133142.
  • Brunton, D.H. 1997. Impacts of predators: center nests are less successful than edge nests in a large nesting colony of Least Terns. Condor 99: 372380.
  • Burger, J. 1977. Crow predation on Black-crowned Night Heron eggs. Wilson Bull 89: 350351.
  • Burger, J. 1984. Colony stability in Least Terns. Condor 86: 6167.
  • Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. 1998. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Cézilly, F., Dubois, F. & Pagel, M. 2000. Is mate fidelity related to site fidelity? A comparative analysis in Ciconiiformes. Anim. Behav. 59: 11431152.
  • Clode, D. 1993. Colonially breeding seabirds: predators or prey Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 336338.
  • Collias, N.E. & Collias, E.C. 1984. Nest Building and Bird Behavior. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
  • Couzin, I.D., Krause, J., Franks, N.R. & Levin, S.A. 2005. Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature 433: 513516.
  • Cramp, S. 19851992. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: The birds of the Western Palaearctic, Vols 4–6. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Cramp, S. & Perrins, C.M. 19931994. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: The Birds of the Western Palaearctic, Vols 7–8. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Cramp, S. & Simmons, K.E.L. 19771983. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: The Birds of the Western Palaearctic, Vols 1–3. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Crochet, P.A., Bonhomme, F. & Lebreton, J.D. 2000. Molecular phylogeny and plumage evolution in Gulls (Larini). J. Evol. Biol. 13: 4757.
  • Crook, J.H. 1965. The adaptive significance of avian social organizations. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 14: 181218.
  • Danchin, E. & Giraldeau, L.-A. 2005. Vivre en groupe: hypothèses et controverses. In: Écologie Comportementale (E.Danchin, L.-A.Giraldeau & F.Cézilly, eds), pp. 367405. Dunod, Paris.
  • Danchin, E., & Wagner, R.H. 1997. The evolution of coloniality: the emergence of new perspectives. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 342347.
  • Darling, F.F. 1938. Bird Flocks and the Breeding Cycle. A Contribution to the Study of Avian Sociality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Dubois, F., Cezilly, F. & Pagel, M.D. 1998. Mate fidelity and coloniality in waterbirds: a comparative analysis. Oecologia 116: 433440.
  • Duncan, P. & Vigne, N. 1979. The effect of group size in horses on the rate of attacks by blood-sucking flies. Anim. Behav. 27: 623625.
  • Eberhard, J.R. 2002. Cavity adoption and the evolution of coloniality in cavity-nesting birds. Condor 104: 240247.
  • Elliot, R.D. 1985. The exclusion of avian predators from aggregations of nesting Lapwings (Vanellus vanellus). Anim. Behav. 33: 308314.
  • Ferrière, R., Cazelles, B., Cézilly, F. & Desportes, J.P. 1996. Predictability and chaos in bird vigilant behaviour. Anim. Behav. 52: 457472.
  • Foster, W.A. & Treherne, J.E. 1981. Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature 293: 466467.
  • Friesen, V.L. & Anderson, D.J. 1997. Phylogeny and evolution of the Sulidae (Aves: Pelecaniformes): a test of alternative modes of speciation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7: 252260.
  • Garland, T., Dickerman, A.W. Jr, Janis, C.M. & Jones, J.A. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42: 265292.
  • Giannini, N. & Bertelli, S. 2004. Phylogeny of extant penguins based on integumentary and breeding characters. Auk 121: 422434.
  • Gotmark, F. & Andersson, M. 1984. Colonial breeding reduces nest predation in the Common Gull (Larus canus). Anim. Behav. 32: 485492.
  • Griffiths, C.S. 1999. Phylogeny of the Falconidae inferred from molecular and morphological data. Auk 116: 116130.
  • Hamilton, W.D. 1971. Geometry for the selfish herd. J. Theor. Biol. 31: 295311.
  • Harshman, J. 1994. Reweaving the tapestry: what can we learn from Sibley and Ahlquist (1990)? Auk 111: 377388.
  • Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M.D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Hoogland, J.L. & Sherman, P.W. 1976. Advantages and disadvantages of Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) coloniality. Ecol. Monogr. 46: 3358.
  • Houde, P. 1987. Critical evaluation of DNA hybridization studies in avian systematics. Auk 104: 1732.
  • Del Hoyo, J., Elliot, A. & Sargatal, J. 19921997. Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vols 1–4. Lynx editions, Barcelona.
  • Hunter, R.A. & Morris, R.D. 1976. Nocturnal predation by a Black-crowned Night Heron at a Common Tern colony. Auk 93: 629633.
  • Ims, R.A. 1990. On the adaptive value of reproductive synchrony as a predator-swamping strategy. Am. Nat. 136: 485498.
  • Kennedy, M. & Page, R.D.M. 2002. Seabird supertrees: combining partial estimates of procellariiform phylogeny. Auk 119: 88108.
  • Kennedy, M. & Spencer, H.G. 2004. Phylogenies of the Frigatebirds (Fregatidae) and Tropicbirds (Phaethonidae), two divergent groups of the traditional order Pelecaniformes, inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31: 3138.
  • Kennedy, M., Gray, R.D. & Spencer, H.G. 2000. The phylogenetic relationships of the shags and cormorants: can sequence data resolve a disagreement between behavior and morphology? Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17: 345359.
  • Kenward, R.E. 1978. Hawks and doves: factors affecting success and selection in goshawk attacks on wood-pigeons. J. Anim. Ecol. 47: 449460.
  • Kolm, N., Stein, R.W., Mooers, A.Ø, Verspoor, J.J. & Cunningham, E.J.A. 2006. Can sexual selection drive female life histories? A comparativestudy on Galliform birds. J. Evol. Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01248.x.
  • Kosciuch, K.L. & Langerhans, R.B. 2004. Evolution of coloniality via commodity selection: what about variance? Auk 121, 257262.
  • Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. 1993. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Kruuk, H. 1964. Predators and anti-predator behaviour of the Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus. Behaviour 11: 1129.
  • Lack, D. 1968. Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds. Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Lanyon, S.M. 1992. Book reviews: phylogeny and classification of birds. A study in molecular evolution. Condor 94: 304310.
  • De Leeuw, J. 1992. Introduction to Akaike (1973) information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Breakthroughs in Statistics, Vol. 1 (S.Kotz & N. L.Johnson, eds), pp. 599609. Springer-Verlag, London.
  • Lerner, H.R.L. & Mindell, D.P. 2005. Phylogeny of eagles, Old World vultures, and other Accipitridae based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37: 327346.
  • Møller A.P. 1987. Advantages and disadvantages of coloniality in the Swallow, Hirundo rustica. Anim. Behav. 35: 819832.
  • Møller, A.P., Sorci, G. & Erritze, J. 1998. Sexual dimorphism in immune defense. Am. Nat. 152: 605619.
  • Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2004. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 1.05. http://mesquiteproject.org .
  • Martin, T.E. 1988a. Processes organizing open-nesting bird assemblages: competition or nest predation? Evol. Ecol. 2: 3750.
  • Martin, T.E. 1988b. Habitat and area effects on forest bird assemblages: is nest predation an influence? Ecology 69: 7484.
  • Martin, T.E. 1993a. Evolutionary determinants of clutch size in cavity-nesting birds: nest predation or limited breeding opportunities? Am. Nat. 142: 937946.
  • Martin, T.E. 1993b. Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: revising the dogmas. Am. Nat. 141: 897913.
  • Martin, T.E. 1995. Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecol. Monogr. 65: 101127.
  • Martin, T.E. & Clobert, J. 1996. Nest predation and avian life-history evolution in Europe versus North America: a possible role of humans? Am. Nat. 147: 10281046.
  • Martin, T.E. & Li, P. 1992. Life history traits of open- vs. cavity-nesting birds. Ecology 73: 579592.
  • Mikami, O.K. 2006. A new approach to understanding the evolutionary conditions leading to colonial breeding: a comparison of colonial breeding with solitary territorial breeding and solitary nonterritorial breeding. J. Avian Biol. 37: 125130.
  • Mooers, A.O. & Cotgreave, P. 1994. Sibley and Alquist's tapestry dusted off. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 458459.
  • Moum, T., Johansen, S., Erikstad, K.E. & Piatt, J.F. 1994. Phylogeny and evolution of the auks (subfamily Alcinae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 91: 79127916.
  • Murphy, E.C. & Schauer, J.H. 1996. Synchrony in egg-laying and reproductive success of neighboring Common Murres, Uria aalge. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39: 245258.
  • Nosil, P. & Mooers, A.Ø. 2005. Testing hypotheses about ecological specialization using phylogenetic trees. Evolution 59: 22562263.
  • Nunn, C.L. 1999. The number of males in primate social groups: a comparative test of the socioecological model. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46: 113.
  • Nunn, G.B. & Stanley, S.E. 1998. Body size effects and rates of cytochrome-b evolution in tube-nosed seabirds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 13601371.
  • Nunn, G.B., Cooper, J., Jouventin, P., Robertson, C.J.R. & Robertson, G.G. 1996. Evolutionary relationships among extant albatrosses (Procellariiformes: Diomedeidae) established from complete cytochrome-b gene sequences. Auk 113: 784801.
  • Owens, I.P.F. & Bennett, P.M. 1995. Ancient ecological diversification explains life-history variation among living birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 261: 227232.
  • Pagel, M.D. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255: 3745.
  • Pagel, M.D. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Scr. 26: 331348.
  • Pagel, M.D. 1999a. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401: 877884.
  • Pagel, M.D. 1999b. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48: 612622.
  • Pagel, M.D. 2000. Discrete: Correlated Evolution, Ancestral States and Trait Evolution, Version 4.0. A computer program distributed by the author.
  • Palmer, R.S. 1962. Handbook of North American Birds. Vol. 1: Loons through Flamingos. Yale University Press, New Haven, London.
  • Patterson, I.J. 1965. Timing and spacing of broods in the Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus. Ibis 107: 433459.
  • Perrins, C.M. & Birkhead, T.R. 1983. Avian Ecology. Blackie, Glasgow, London.
  • Poiani, A. & Pagel, M. 1997. Evolution of avian cooperative breeding: comparative tests of the nest predation hypothesis. Evolution 51: 226240.
  • Poulin, R. 1999. The intra- and interspecific relationships between abundance and distribution in helminth parasites of birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 719725.
  • Pulliam, H.R. & Caraco, T. 1984. Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In: Behavioural Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach (J. R.Krebs & N. B.Davies, eds), pp. 122147. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
  • Ricklefs, R.E. 1969. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 9: 148.
  • Roberts, G. 1996. Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Anim. Behav. 51: 10771086.
  • Robinson, S.K. 1985. Coloniality in the Yellow-rumped Cacique as a defense against nest predators. Auk 102: 506519.
  • Rodgers, J.A. 1987. On the antipredator advantages of colonality: a word of caution. Wilson Bull 99: 269271.
  • Rolland, C., Danchin, E. & De Fraipont, M. 1998. The evolution of coloniality in birds in relation to food, habitat, predation, and life-history traits: a comparative analysis. Am. Nat. 151: 514529.
  • Seghers, B.H. 1974. Schooling behaviour in the guppy Poecilia reticulata: an evolutionary response to predation. Evolution 28: 486489.
  • Sheldon, F.H. & Gill, F.B. 1996. A reconsideration of songbird phylogeny, with emphasis on the evolution of titmice and their sylvioid relatives. Syst. Biol. 45: 473495.
  • Sibley, C.G. & Ahlquist, J.E. 1990. Phylogeny and Classification of Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, London.
  • Siegel-Causey, D. & Kharitonov, S.P. 1990. The evolution of coloniality. In: Current Ornithology (D. M.Power, ed.), pp. 285330. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Slikas, B. 1998. Recognizing and testing homology of courtship displays in storks (Aves: Ciconiiformes: Ciconiidae). Evolution 52: 884893.
  • Smith, M.J. & Graves, H.B. 1978. Some factors influencing mobbing behavior in Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica). Behav. Biol. 23: 355372.
  • Thomas, G.H., Wills, M.A. & Székely, T. 2004. A supertree approach to shorebird phylogeny. BMC. Evol. Biol. 4: 28.
  • Tinbergen, N., Impekoven, M. & Frank, D. 1967. An experiment on spacing-out as a defence against predation. Behaviour 28: 307321.
  • Wagner, R.H., Danchin, E., Boulinier, T. & Helfenstein, F. 2000. Colonies as byproducts of commodity selection. Behav. Ecol. 11: 572573.
  • Ward, P. & Zahavi, A. 1973. The importance of certain assemblages of birds as ‘information centres’ for food-finding. Ibis 115: 517534.
  • Whittingham, L.A., Sheldon, F.H. & Emlen, S.T. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of jacanas and its implications for morphologic and biogeographic evolution. Auk 117: 2232.
  • Wiklund, C.G. & Andersson, M. 1994. Natural selection of colony size in a passerine bird. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 765774.
  • Wink, M. & Sauer-Gürth, H. 2000. Advances in the molecular systematics of African raptors. In: Raptors at Risk (R. D.Chancellor & B.-U.Meyburg, eds), pp. 135147. WWGBP and Hancock House, Berlin.
  • Wink, M. & Sauer-Gürth, H. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships in diurnal raptors based on nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear marker genes. In: Raptors Worldwide (R. D.Chancellor & B.-U.Meyburg, eds), pp. 483498. WWGBP and MME, Berlin.
  • Wittenberger, J.F. & Hunt, G.L.J. 1985. The adaptive significance of coloniality in birds. In: Avian Biology (D. S.Farner, J. R.King & K. C.Parkes, eds), pp. 178. Academic Press, New York.