SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerly, D.D. 2000. Taxon sampling, correlated evolution, and independent contrasts. Evolution 54: 14801492.
  • Alcock, J. 1994. Postinsemination associations between males and females in insects: the mate-guarding hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39: 121.
  • Alexander, R.D., Marshall, D.C. & Cooley, J.R. 1997. Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. In: The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (J. C.Choe & B. J.Crespi, eds), pp. 331. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Arnqvist, G. 1989. Sexual selection in water strider: the function, nature of selection and heritability of a male grasping apparatus. Oikos 56: 344350.
  • Arnqvist, G. 1998. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393: 784786.
  • Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 1995. Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes: a morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 261: 123127.
  • Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2002a. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56: 936947.
  • Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2002b. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415: 787789.
  • Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Bertin, A. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2005. One tool, many uses: precopulatory sexual selection on genital morphology in Aquarius remigis. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 949961.
  • Birkhead, T.R. & Møller, A.P. 1998. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  • Birkhead, T.R. & Pizzari, T. 2002. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 262273.
  • Blomberg, S.P., Garland, T. & Ives, A.R. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57: 717745.
  • Córdoba-Aguilar, A. 2002. Sensory trap as the mechanism of sexual selection in an damselfly genitalic trait (Insects: Calopterygidae). Am. Nat. 160: 504601.
  • Dickinson, J.L. 1997. Multiple mating, sperm competition, and cryptic female choice in the leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). In: The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (J. C.Choe & B. J.Crespi, eds), pp. 164183. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 1985. Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 2004. Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice. Evolution 58: 19471970.
  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 115.
  • Gage, M.J.G., Parker, G.A., Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. 2002. Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 23092316.
  • Garland, T., Harvey, P.H. & Ives, A.R. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41: 1832.
  • Gomendio, M., Martin-Coello, J., Crespo, C., Magaña, C. & Roldan, E.R.S. 2006. Sperm competition enhances functional capacity of mammalian spermatozoa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103: 1511315117.
  • Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M.D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Hosken, D.J. & Stockley, P. 2004. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 8793.
  • Hosken, D.J., Jones, K.E., Chipperfield, K. & Dixson, A. 2001. Is the bat os penis sexually selected? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50: 450460.
  • Ishikawa, R. 1987. On the function of copulatory organs of Ohomopterus (Coleoptera, Carabidae, genus Carabus). Kontyû (Tokyo) 55: 202206.
  • Ishikawa, R. 1991. The Evolution of Carabus: Divergence and Isolating Mechanisms. Yasaka Shobo, Tokyo (in Japanese).
  • Ishikawa, R. & Kubota, K. 1994. Geographical races of Carabus maiyasanus Bates and C. arrowianus (Breuning) in Honshu, Japan: a tentative revision (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Bull. Biogeogr. Soc. Jpn 49: 105128.
  • Klingenberg, C.P. 1996. Multivariate allometry. In: Advances in Morphometrics (L. F.Marcus, M.Corti, A.Loy, G. J. P.Naylor & D. E.Slice, eds), pp. 2349. Plenum, New York.
  • Larivière, S. & Ferguson, S.H. 2002. On the evolution of the mammalian baculum: vaginal friction, prolonged intromission or induced ovulation? Mamm. Rev. 32: 283294.
  • Laurin, M. 2004. The evolution of body size, Cope's rule and the origin of Amniotes. Syst. Biol. 53: 594622.
  • Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2004. Mesquite: A modular System for Evolutionary Analysis, version 1.05. http://mesquiteproject.org .
  • Maddison, W.P. & Slatkin, M. 1991. Null models for the number of evolutionary steps in a character on a phylogenetic tree. Evolution 45: 11841197.
  • Martins, E.P. & Garland, T. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45: 534557.
  • Midford, P.E., Garland, T. & Maddison, W.P. 2003. PDAP Package. http://mesquiteproject.org/pdap_mesquite .
  • Parker, G.A. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45: 525567.
  • Parker, G.A. 1974. Courtship persistence and female-guarding as male time investment strategies. Behaviour 48: 157184.
  • Parker, G.A. 1984. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. In: Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (R. L.Smith, ed.), pp. 260. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  • Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817818.
  • Rodríguez, V., Windsor, D.M. & Eberhard, W.G. 2004. Tortoise beetle genitalia and demonstrations of a sexually selected advantage for flagellum length in Chelymorpha alternans (Chrysomelidae, Cassidini, Stolaini). In: New Developments in the Biology of Chrysomelidae (P.Jolivet, J. A.Santiago-Blay & M.Schmitt, eds), pp. 739748. Academic Publishing bv, The Hague.
  • Rowe, L. & Arnqvist, G. 2002. Sexually antagonistic coevolution in a mating system: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes. Evolution 56: 754767.
  • SAS Institute Inc. 2004. JMP version 5, release 5.1.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  • Shuster, S.M. & Wade, M.J. 2003. Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Simmons, L.W. 2001. Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Sota, T. 1985. Activity patterns, diets and interspecific interactions of coexisting spring and autumn breeding carabids: Carabus yaconinus and Leptocarabus kumagaii (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Ecol. Entomol. 10: 315324.
  • Sota, T. 2002. Radiation and reticulation: extensive introgressive hybridization in the carabid beetles Ohomopterus inferred from mitochondrial gene genealogy. Popul. Ecol. 44: 145156.
  • Sota, T. & Ishikawa, R. 2004. Phylogeny and life-history evolution in Carabus (subtribe Carabina: Coleoptera, Carabidae) based on sequences of two nuclear genes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 81: 135149.
  • Sota, T. & Vogler, A.P. 2001. Incongruence of mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees in the carabid beetles Ohomopterus. Syst. Biol. 50: 3959.
  • Sota, T. & Vogler, A.P. 2003. Reconstructing species phylogeny of the carabid beetles Ohomopterus using multiple nuclear DNA sequences: heterogeneous information content and the performance of simultaneous analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26: 139154.
  • Stockley, P. 2002. Sperm competition risk and male genital anatomy: comparative evidence for reduced duration of female sexual receptivity in primates with penile spines. Evol. Ecol. 16: 123137.
  • Su, Z.H., Tominaga, O., Ohama, T., Kajiwara, E., Ishikawa, R., Okada, T.S., Nakamura, K. & Osawa, S. 1996. Parallel evolution in radiation of Ohomopterus ground beetles inferred from mitochondrial ND5 sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 43: 662674.
  • Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4.10b. Sinauer Associations, Sunderland.
  • Takami, Y. 2000a. Phylogeny of the subgenus Ohomopterus (Coleoptera, Carabidae, genus Carabus): a morphological aspect. Tokyo Metropol. Univ. Bull. Nat. Hist. 4: 132.
  • Takami, Y. 2000b. Evolution of genitalia and speciation in Carabus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with special reference to the subgenus Ohomopterus. PhD thesis, in Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo.
  • Takami, Y. 2002. Mating behavior, insemination and sperm transfer in the ground beetle Carabus insulicola. Zool. Sci. 19: 10671073.
  • Takami, Y. 2003. Experimental analysis of the effect of genital morphology on insemination success in the ground beetle Carabus insulicola (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 15: 5161.
  • Takami, Y. 2007. Spermatophore displacement and male fertilization success in the ground beetle Carabus insulicola. Behav. Ecol. in press.
  • Waage, J.K. 1979. Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer. Science 203: 916918.
  • Waage, J.K. 1986. Evidence for widespread sperm displacement ability among Zygoptera (Odonata) and the means for predicting its presence. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 28: 285300.
  • Yamamura, N. 1986. An evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) model of postcopulatory guarding in insects. Theor. Popul. Biol. 29: 438455.
  • Yamamura, N. & Tsuji, N. 1989. Post-copulatory guarding strategy in a finite mating period. Theor. Popul. Biol. 35: 3650.