SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alfonso, L., Noguera, J.L., Babot, D. & Estany, J. 1997. Estimates of genetic parameters for litter size at different parities in pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 47: 149156.
  • Belsley, D.A. 1991. Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression. Wiley, New York.
  • Catchpole, E.A., Fan, Y., Morgan, B.J.T., Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Coulson, T. 2004. Sexual dimorphism, survival and dispersal in red deer. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 9: 126.
  • Charmantier, A. & Réale, D. 2005. How do misassigned paternities affect the estimation of heritability in the wild? Mol. Ecol. 14: 28392850.
  • Charmantier, A., Kruuk, L.E.B., Blondel, J. & Lambrechts, M.M. 2004. Testing for microevolution in body size in three blue tit populations. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 732743.
  • Charmantier, A., Perrins, C., McCleery, R.H. & Sheldon, B.C. 2006. Evolutionary response to selection on clutch size in a long-term study of the mute swan. Am. Nat. 167: 453465.
  • Clement, V., Bibe, B., Verrier, E., Elsen, J.M., Manfredi, E., Bouix, J. & Hanocq, E. 2001. Simulation analysis to test the influence of model adequacy and data structure on the estimation of genetic parameters for traits with direct and maternal effects. Genet. Sel. Evol. 33: 369395.
  • Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Pemberton, J.M. 2004. Soay Sheep: Population Dynamics and Selection on St. Kilda. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Clutton-Brock, T.H., Guinness, F.E. & Albon, S.D. 1982. Red Deer – Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Coltman, D.W., Pilkington, J., Kruuk, L.E.B., Wilson, K. & Pemberton, J.M. 2001. Positive genetic correlation between parasite resistance and body size in a free-living ungulate population. Evolution 55: 21162125.
  • Falconer, D.S. & Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, Essex.
  • Garant, D. & Kruuk, L.E.B. 2005. How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations. Mol. Ecol. 14: 18431859.
  • Gilmour, A.R., Gogel, B.J., Cullis, B.R., Welham, S.J. & Thompson, R. 2002. ASReml User Guide Release 1.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
  • Hadfield, J.D., Burgess, M.D., Lord, A., Phillimore, A.B., Clegg, S.M. & Owens, I.P.F. 2006. Direct versus indirect sexual selection: genetic basis of colour, size and recruitment in a wild bird. Proc. R. Soc. B 273: 13471353.
  • Hanocq, E., Boichard, D. & Foulley, J.L. 1996. A simulation study of the effect of connectedness on genetic trend. Genet. Sel. Evol. 28: 6782.
  • van der Jeugd, H.P. & McCleery, R. 2002. Effects of spatial autocorrelation, natal philopatry and phenotypic plasticity on the heritability of laying date. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 380387.
  • Kirkpatrick, M. & Lande, R. 1989. The evolution of maternal characters. Evolution 43: 485503.
  • Krist, M. & Remes, V. 2004. Egg size and offspring performance: in search of the best method. Oikos 106: 422426.
  • Kruuk, L.E.B. 2004. Estimating genetic parameters in wild populations using the ‘animal model’. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 359: 873890.
  • Kruuk, L.E.B., Clutton-Brock, T.H., Slate, J., Pemberton, J.M., Brotherstone, S. & Guinness, F.E. 2000. Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97: 698703.
  • Kruuk, L.E.B., Merilä, J. & Sheldon, B.C. 2001. Phenotypic selection on heritable size traits revisited. Am. Nat. 158: 557571.
  • Kruuk, L.E.B., Slate, J., Pemberton, J.M., Brotherstone, S., Guinness, F.E. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2002. Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution. Evolution 56: 16831695.
  • Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • MacColl, A.D.C. & Hatchwell, B.J. 2003. Heritability of parental investment in a passerine bird. Evolution 57: 21912195.
  • Marshall, T.C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L.E.B. & Pemberton, J.M. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7: 639655.
  • McAdam, A.G., Boutin, S., Réale, D. & Berteaux, D. 2002. Maternal effects and the potential for evolution in a natural population of animals. Evolution 56: 846851.
  • McCleery, R.H., Pettifor, R.A., Armbruster, P., Meyer, K., Sheldon, B. & Perrins, C.M. 2004. Components of variance underlying fitness in a natural population of the great tit Parus major. Am. Nat. 164: E64E74.
  • Merilä, J. 1996. Genetic variation in offspring condition: an experiment. Funct. Ecol. 10: 465474.
  • Merilä, J. 1997. Expression of genetic variation in body size of the collared flycatcher under different environmental conditions. Evolution 51: 526536.
  • Merilä, J. & Sheldon, B.C. 2001. Avian quantitative genetics. Curr. Ornithol. 16: 179255.
  • Merilä, J., Kruuk, L.E.B. & Sheldon, B.C. 2001a. Cryptic evolution in a wild bird population. Nature 412: 7679.
  • Merilä, J., Kruuk, L.E.B. & Sheldon, B.C. 2001b. Natural selection on the genetical component of variance in body condition in a wild bird population. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 918929.
  • Merilä, J., Kruuk, L.E.B. & Sheldon, B.C. 2006. Evolution and expression of genetic variation in nestling traits. Proc. 23rd Int. Ornithol. Cong., Acta Zool. Sin. 52 (Suppl.): 666669.
  • Meyer, K. 1998. Estimating covariance functions for longitudinal data using a random regression model. Genet. Sel. Evol. 30: 221240.
  • Mousseau, T.A. & Fox, C.W. 1998. Maternal Effects as Adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Nespolo, R.F., Bacigalupe, L.D. & Bozinovic, F. 2003. Heritability of energetics in a wild mammal, the leaf-eared mouse (Phyllotis darwini). Evolution 57: 16791688.
  • Perrins, C.M. 1979. British Tits. Collins, London.
  • Pettay, J.E., Kruuk, L.E.B., Jokela, J. & Lummaa, V. 2005. Heritability and genetic constraints of life-history trait evolution in preindustrial humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102: 28382843.
  • Pinheiro, J.C. & Bates, D.M. 2000. Mixed Effects Models in S and S-Plus. Springer Verlag, New York.
  • Postma, E. 2006. Implications of the difference between true and predicted breeding values for the study of natural selection and micro-evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 309320.
  • Quinn, J.L., Charmantier, A., Garant, D. & Sheldon, B.C. 2006. Data depth, data completeness, and their influence on quantitative genetic estimation in two contrasting bird populations. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 9941002.
  • R Development Team. ‘‘R: A Language and environment for statistical computing’’. Publisher: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, http://www.r-project.org .
  • Räsänen, K. & Kruuk, L.E.B. 2007. Maternal Effects and Evolution on Ecological Time Scales. Funct. Ecol. 21: 408421.
  • Rauter, C.M. & Moore, A.J. 2002. Evolutionary importance of parental care performance, food resources, and direct and indirect genetic effects in a burying beetle. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 407417.
  • Réale, D., Festa-Bianchet, M. & Jorgenson, J.T. 1999. Heritability of body mass varies with age and season in wild bighorn sheep. Heredity 83: 526532.
  • Riska, B., Rutledge, J.J. & Atchley, W.R. 1985. Covariance between direct and maternal genetic-effects in mice, with a model of persistent environmental-influences. Genet. Res. 45: 287297.
  • Rossiter, M.C. 1996. Incidence and consequences of inherited environmental effects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 451476.
  • Satoh, M., Hicks, C., Ishii, K. & Furukhawa, T. 2002. Choice of statistical model for estimating genetic parameters using restricted maximum likelihood in swine. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 119: 285296.
  • Sorensen, D.A. & Gianola, D. 2002. Likelihood, Bayesian and MCMC Methods in Quantitative Genetics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Stewart, G.W. 1987. Collinearity and least squares regression. Stat. Sci. 2: 6884.
  • Wilham, R.L. 1972. The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. J. Anim. Sci. 28: 7481.
  • Wilson, A.J., Coltman, D.W., Pemberton, J.M., Overall, A.J., Byrne, K.A. & Kruuk, L.E.B. 2005a. Maternal genetic effects set the potential for evolution in a free-living vertebrate population. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 405414.
  • Wilson, A.J., Kruuk, L.E.B. & Coltman, D.W. 2005b. Ontogenetic patterns in heritable variation for body size: using random regression models in a wild ungulate population. Am. Nat. 166: E177E192.
  • Wilson, A.J., Pemberton, J.M., Pilkington, J.G., Coltman, D.W., Mifsud, D.V., Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Kruuk, L.E.B. 2006. Environmental coupling of selection and heritability limits evolution. PLoS Biol. 4: e216.