Present Address: Western Australian Museum, Perth, WA 6000, Australia.
Male choice generates stabilizing sexual selection on a female fecundity correlate
Article first published online: 23 JUL 2007
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 20, Issue 5, pages 1745–1750, September 2007
How to Cite
CHENOWETH, S. F., PETFIELD, D., DOUGHTY, P. and BLOWS, M. W. (2007), Male choice generates stabilizing sexual selection on a female fecundity correlate. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20: 1745–1750. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01390.x
- Issue published online: 23 JUL 2007
- Article first published online: 23 JUL 2007
- Received 23 February 2007; revised 14 May 2007; accepted 17 May 2007
- 2000. Why are female birds ornamented? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:149–155.
- 2001. Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:13155–13160. &
- 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
- 2004. Orientation of the genetic variance–covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits. Am. Nat. 163:E329–E340. , &
- 2001. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol. Rev. 76:305–339.
- 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural-selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:313–318. , &
- 1977. Parental investment, mate choice and mate quality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74:3476–3479.
- 2006. Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 273:917–922. &
- 2003. Signal trait sexual dimorphism and mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 57:2326–2334. &
- 2005. Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata. Am. Nat. 165:281–289. &
- 2006. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation? Ecol. Lett. 9:179–184. , &
- 2004. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 271:771–783. , &
- 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Longman, Essex, UK. &
- 1995. Ornaments or offspring: costs to reproductive success restrict sexual selection processes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 55:251–260. , &
- 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290:519–521. , &
- 2002. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and offspring fitness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 269:2215–2219. , , &
- 2004. What is genetic quality? Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:329–333. , , &
- 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72:283–327. &
- 1996. Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution 50:1382–1391. , &
- 1993. Mutual sexual selection in a monogamous seabird. Nature 362:238–239. &
- 2002. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357:319–330. &
- 2001. Predicting the direction of sexual selection. Ecol. Lett. 4:159–165. &
- 1999. Variance in female quality, operational sex ratio and male mate choice in a bushcricket. Behav. Ecol. Soc. 45:245–252. &
- 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210–1226. &
- 2003. Nonlinear and correlational sexual selection on ‘honest’ female ornamentation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 270:2159–2165. , &
- 2000. The influence of male and female body size on copulation duration and fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 132:243–247. &
- 1987. Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41:1149–1161. &
- 1994. Sex-differences, sex-ratios and sex-roles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 258:93–99. &
- 1983. Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Mate Choice (P. Bateson, ed.), pp. 141–166. Cambridge University Press, New York.
- 2005. Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102:6045–6050. , , &
- 1996. The shape of female mating preferences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93:14628–14631.
- 1994. Patterns of biosynthesis and accumulation of hydrocarbons and contact sex-pheromone in the female German-cockroach, Blattella germanica. Arch. Insect. Biochem. Physiol. 25:375–391. , , &
- 1988. Estimating the form of natural-selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42:849–861.
- 2006. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice. Evolution 60:674–685. &
- 1998. Heritable variation for fecundity in field-collected Drosophila melanogaster and their offspring reared under different environmental temperatures. Evolution 52:134–143. &
- 1990. Examining selection on the multivariate phenotype: plant resistance to herbivores. Evolution 44:1177–1188.
- 1960. Effects of size on fecundity, longevity and viability in populations of Drosophila-Pseudoobscura. Am. Nat. 94:395–403. &
- 2004. Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:323–328. , , &
- 1972. Paternal investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Decent of Man 1871–1971 (B. G. Campbell, ed.), pp. 136–179. Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago, IL.
- 1995. Influence of ovary and ecdysteroids on pheromone biosynthesis in Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 92:197–202. &
- 1999. Food intake in Blattella germanica (L.) nymphs affects hydrocarbon synthesis and its allocation in adults between epicuticle and reproduction. Arch. Insect. Biochem. Physiol. 41:214–224. , &