SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Badyaev, A.V. 2005. Stress-induced variation in evolution: from behavioural plasticity to genetic assimilation. Proc. R. Soc. B. 272: 877886.
  • Birdsall, K., Zimmerman, E., Teeter, K. & Gibson, G. 2000. Genetic variation for the positioning of wing veins in Drosophila melanogaster. Evol. Dev. 2: 1624.
  • Bookstein, F.L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Bookstein, F.L. 1996. Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bull. Math. Biol. 58: 313365.
  • Carreira, V., Soto, I.M., Fanara, J.J. & Hasson, E. 2006. Patterns of variation in wing morphology in the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii and its sibling D. koepferae. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 12751282.
  • Carreira, V., Soto, I.M., Fanara, J.J. & Hasson, E. 2007. A study of wing morphology and fluctuating asymmetry of interspecific hybrids between Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae. Genetica DOI: DOI: 10.1007/s10709-007-9176-z.
  • Cavicchi, S., Guerra, D., Giorgi, G. & Pezzoli, C. 1985. Temperature-related divergence in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 1. Genetic and developmental basis of wing size and shape variation. Genetics 109: 665689.
  • Charlesworth, B., Lande, R. & Slatkin, M. 1982. A neo-Darwinian commentary on macroevolution. Evolution 36: 474498.
  • Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Cuervo, A.M. & Restrepo, C. 2007. Assemblage and population-level consequences of forest fragmentation on bilateral asymmetry in tropical montane birds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 92: 119133.
  • Dambroski, H.R., Linn, C., Berlocher, S., Forbes, A.A., Roelofs, W. & Feder, J.L. 2005. The genetic basis for fruit odor discrimination in Rhagoletis flies and its significance for sympatric host shifts. Evolution 59: 19531964.
  • Darwin, C. 1859. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life. Modern Library, New York.
  • David, J. 1962. A new medium for rearing Drosophila in axenic conditions. Dros. Inf. Serv. 36: 128.
  • David, J.R., Moreteau, B., Gauthier, J.P., Pétavy, G., Stockel, A. & Imasheva, A.G. 1994. Reaction norms of size characters in relation to growth temperature in Drosophila melanogaster: an isofemale lines analysis. Genet. Sel. Evol. 26: 229251.
  • De Celis, J.F. 2003. Pattern formation in the Drosophila wing: the development of the veins. Bioessays 25: 443451.
  • Debat, V., Alibert, P., David, P., Paradis, E. & Auffray, J.C. 2000. Independence between developmental stability and canalization in the skull of the house mouse. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. 267: 423430.
  • Debat, V., Bégin, M., Legout, H. & David, J.R. 2003. Allometric and non allometric components of Drosophila wing shape respond differently to developmental temperature. Evolution 57: 27732784.
  • Dryden, I.L. & Mardia, K.V. 1998. Statistical Shape Analysis. Wiley, Chichester.
  • Dujardin, J.P. & Slice, D. 2007. Geometric morphometrics: Contributions to Medical Entomology. In: Encyclopedia of Infectious Diseases – Modern Methods (M.Tibayrenc, ed), 435445. John Wiley and Sons.
  • Etges, W.J. 1990. Direction of life-history evolution in Drosophila mojavensis. In: Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila (J. S. F.Barker, W. T.Starmer & R. J.MacIntyre, eds), pp. 3756. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Etges, W.J., Veenstra, C.L. & Jackson, L.L. 2006. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. VII. Effects of larval dietary fatty acids on adult epicuticular hydrocarbons. J. Chem. Ecol. 32: 26292646.
  • Fanara, J.J. & Hasson, E. 2001. Oviposition acceptance and fecundity schedule in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae on their natural hosts. Evolution 55: 26152619.
  • Fanara, J.J., Fontdevila, A. & Hasson, E. 1999. Oviposition preference, viability, developmental time and body size in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila koepferae and D. buzzatii in association to their natural hosts. Evol. Ecol. 13: 173190.
  • Fanara, J.J., Mensch, J., Folguera, G. & Hasson, E. 2004. Developmental time and thorax length differences between the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae reared in different natural hosts. Evol. Ecol. 18: 203214.
  • Faurby, S., Kjaersgaard, A., Pertoldi, C. & Loeschcke, V. 2005. The effect of maternal and grandmaternal age in benign and high temperature environments. Exp. Gerontol. 40: 988996.
  • Flatt, T. 2005. The evolutionary genetics of canalization. Q. Rev. Biol. 80: 287316.
  • Floate, K.D. & Fox, A.S. 2000. Flies under stress: a test of fluctuating asymmetry as a biomonitor of environmental quality. Ecol. Appl. 10: 15411550.
  • Fogleman, J.C. & Abril, J.R. 1990. Ecological and evolutionary importance of host plant chemistry. In: Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila (J. S. F.Barker, W. T.Starmer & R.MacIntyre, eds), pp. 121143. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Fontdevila, A., Pla, C., Hasson, E., Wasserman, M., Sanchez, A., Naveira, H. & Ruiz, A. 1988. Drosophila koepferae: a new member of the Drosophila serido (Diptera-Drosophilidae) super-species taxon. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 81: 380385.
  • Garcia-Bellido, A., Ripio, P. & Morata, G. 1973. Developmental compartimentalization of the wing disk of Drosophila. Nature 245: 251253.
  • Gibbs, M. & Breuker, C.J. 2006. Effect of larval-rearing density on adult life-history traits and developmental stability of the dorsal eyespot pattern in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 118: 4147.
  • Gilchrist, G.W., Huey, R.B., Balanyà, J., Pascual, M. & Serra, L. 2004. A tim series of evolution in action: a latitudinal cline in wing size in South American Drosophila suboscura. Evolution 58: 768780.
  • Graham, J.H., Freeman, D.C. & Emlen, J.M. 1993a. Antisymmetry, directional asymmetry, and dynamic morphogenesis. Genetica 89: 121137.
  • Graham, J.H., Roe, K.E. & West, T.B. 1993b. Effects of lead and benzene on the developmental stability of Drosophila melanogaster. Ecotoxicology 2: 185195.
  • Graham, J.H., Emlen, J.M., Freeman, D.C., Leamy, L.J. & Kieser, J.A. 1998. Directional asymmetry and the measurement of developmental instability. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 64: 116.
  • Guerra, D., Pezzoli, M.C., Giorgi, G., Garoia, F. & Cavicchi, S. 1997. Developmental constraints in the Drosophila wing. Heredity 79: 564571.
  • Hasson, E., Fanara, J.J., Rodríguez, C., Vilardi, J.C., Reig, O.A. & Fontdevila, A. 1992. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXIV: second chromosome inversions have different average effect on thorax length. Heredity 68: 557563.
  • Hawthorne, D.J. & Via, S. 2001. Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature 412: 904907.
  • Jaenike, J. & Holt, R.D. 1991. Genetic variation for habitat preference: evidence and explanations. Am. Nat. 137: 567590.
  • Jaureguy, L.M. & Etges, W.J. 2007. Assessing patterns of senescence in Drosophila mojavensis reared on different host cacti. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9: 91107.
  • Jones, C.D. 1998. The genetic basis of Drosophila sechellia’s resistance to a host plant toxin. Genetics 149: 18991908.
  • Jones, C.D. 2004. Genetics of egg production in Drosophila sechellia. Heredity 92: 235241.
  • Kark, S. 2001. Shifts in bilateral asymmetry within a distribution range: the case of the chukar partridge. Evolution 55: 20882096.
  • Kircher, H.W. 1982. Chemical composition of cacti and its relationship to Sonoran desert Drosophila. In: Ecological Genetics and Evolution (J. S. F.Barker & W. T.Starmer, eds), pp. 143158. Academic Press, Sydney, Australia.
  • Klingenberg, C.P. 2002. Developmental instability as a research tool: using patterns of fluctuating asymmetry to infer the developmental origins of morphological integration. In: Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences (M.Polak, Ed.), pp. 427442. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Klingenberg, C.P. & McIntyre, S. 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating assymetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 52: 13631375.
  • Klingenberg, C.P. & Zaklan, S.D. 2000. Morphological integration between development compartments in the Drosophila wing. Evolution 54: 12731285.
  • Klingenberg, C.P., Barluenga, M. & Meyer, A. 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56: 19091920.
  • Lawrence, P.A. 1992. The Making of a Fly: The Genetics of Animal Design. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
  • Lawrence, P.A. & Morata, G. 1976. The compartment hypothesis. Symp. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 8: 132149.
  • Leamy, L. 1984. Morphometric studies in inbred and hybrid house mice. V. Directional and fluctuating asymmetry. Am. Nat. 123: 579593.
  • Mackay, T.F.C. 2004. The genetic architecture of quantitative traits: lessons from Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14: 253257.
  • Manfrin, M.H. & Sene, F.M. 2006. Cactophilic Drosophila in South America: a model for evolutionary studies. Genetica 126: 5775.
  • Maynard Smith, J., Burian, R., Kauffman, S., Alberch, P., Campbell, J., Goodwin, B., Lande, R., Raup, D. & Wolpert, L. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution: a perspective from the Mountain Lake Conference on development and evolution. Q. Rev. Biol. 60: 265287.
  • McBride, C.S. 2007. Rapid evolution of smell and taste receptor genes during host specialization in Drosophila sechellia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 12: 49965001.
  • McIntosh, A.R., Bookstein, F., Haxby, J. & Grady, C. 1996. Multivariate analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares. NeuroImage 3: 143157.
  • Mitter, C. & Futuyma, D.J. 1983. An evolutionary-genetic view of host-plant utilization by insects. In: Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems (R. F.Denno & M. S.Mcclure, eds), pp. 427459. Academic Press, New York.
  • Moraes, E.M., Spressola, V.L., Prado, P.R.R., Costa, L.F. & Sene, F.M. 2004. Divergence in wing morphology among sibling species of the Drosophila buzzatii cluster. J. Zoolog. Syst. Evol. Res. 42: 154158.
  • Moreteau, B., Imasheva, A.G., Morin, J.P. & David, J.R. 1998. Wing shape and developmental temperature in two Drosophila sibling species: different wing regions exhibit different norms of reaction. Genetika 34: 248258.
  • Morin, J.P., Moreteau, B., Pétavy, G. & David, J.R. 1999. Divergence of reaction norms of size characters between tropical and temperate populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 329339.
  • Nicieza, A.G., Álvarez, D. & Atienza, E.M.S. 2006. Delayed effects of larval predation risk and food quality on anuran juvenile performance. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 10921103.
  • Palmer, A.R. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry analyses: a primer. In: Developmental Instability: Its Origins and Evolutionary Implications (T. A.Markow, Ed.), pp. 335364. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  • Palmer, A.R. & Strobeck, C. 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: measurements, analysis, patterns. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 391421.
  • Palmer, A.R. & Strobeck, C. 1992. Fluctuating assymetry as a measure of developmental stability: implications of non-normal distributions and power of statistical tests. Acta Zool. Fenn. 191: 5772.
  • Pezzoli, M.C., Guerra, D., Giorgi, G., Garoia, F. & Cavicchi, S. 1997. Developmental constraints and wing shape variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 79: 572577.
  • Polack, M. (Ed.) 2003. Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Powell, J.R. 1997. Progress and Prospects in Evolutionary Biology: The Drosophila Model. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Réale, D. & Roff, D.A. 2003. Inbreeeding, developmental stability, and canalization in the sand cricket Gryllus firmus. Evolution 57: 597605.
  • Rego, C., Matos, M. & Santos, M. 2006. Symmetry breaking in interspecific Drosophila hybrids is not due to developmental noise. Evolution 60: 746761.
  • Rohlf, F.J. 1993. Relative warp analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings. In: Contributions to Morphometrics (L. F.Marcus, E.Bello & A.Garcia-Valdecasas, eds), pp. 131159. Monografias, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid.
  • Rohlf, F.J. 2003a. TpsDig ver. 1.38. Available at: http://morph.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/index.html. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, New York.
  • Rohlf, F.J. 2003b. TpsSmall ver. v 1.20. Available at: http://morph.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/index.html. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, New York.
  • Rohlf, F.J. 2003c. TpsRelw ver. 1.31. Available at: http://morph.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/index.html. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, New York.
  • Rohlf, F.J. 2005. TpsPLS ver. 1.14. Available at: http://morph.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/index.html. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, New York.
  • Ruiz, A.H. & Wasserman, M. 1993. Evolutionary cytogenetics of the Drosophila buzzatii species complex. Heredity 70: 582596.
  • Santos, M. 2001. Fluctuating asymmetry is nongenetically related to mating succes in Drosophila buzzatii. Evolution 55: 22482256.
  • Santos, M., Brites, D. & Laayouni, H. 2006. Thermal evolution of pre-adult life history traits, geometric size and shape, and developmental stability in Drosophila subobscura. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 20062021.
  • Schlichting, C. & Pigliucci, M. 1998. Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Schmalhausen, I.I. 1949. Factors of Evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Soto, I.M., Manfrin, M.H., Sene, F.M. & Hasson, E. 2007a. Viability and developmental time in the cactophilic Drosophila gouveai and D. antonietae (Diptera: Drosophilidae) are dependent of the cactus host. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am 4: 490496.
  • Soto, I.M., Carreira, V.P., Fanara, J.J. & Hasson, E. 2007b. Evolution of male genitalia: environmental and genetic factors affecting genital morphology in sibling Drosophila species and their hybrids. BMC Evol. Biol. 7: 77.
  • Soto, I.M., Hasson, E. & Manfrin, M.H. 2007c. Wing morphology is related to host plants in cactophilic Drosophila gouveai and D. antonietae (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. in press.
  • StatSoft. Inc. 2001. statistica (data analysis software system), version 6.0. Available at: http://www.statsoft.com.
  • Stige, L.C., Hessen, D.O. & Vøllestad, L.A. 2004. Severe food stress has no detectable impact on developmental instability in Daphnia magna. Oikos 107: 519530.
  • Van Valen, L. 1962. A study of fluctuating assymetry. Evolution 16: 125142.
  • Via, S. 1990. Ecological genetics and host adaptation in herbivorous insects: the experimental study of evolution in natural and agricultural systems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35: 421446.
  • Waddington, C.H. 1942. Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature 150: 563565.
  • Wasserman, M. 1982. Evolution of the repleta Group. In: The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3 (M.Ashburner, H. L.Carson & J. N.ThompsonJr, eds), 61139. Academic, London.
  • Zakharov, V.M. 1992. Population phenogenetics: analysis of developmental stability in natural populations. Acta Zool. Fenn. 191: 730.
  • Zimmerman, E., Palsson, A. & Gibson, G. 2000. Quantitative trait loci affecting components of wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 155: 671683.