SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Airoldi, J.P. & Flury, B.D. 1988. An application of common principal component analysis to cranial morphometry of Microtus californicus and M. ochrogaster (Mammalia, Rodentia). J. Zool. 216: 2136.
  • Anderson, T.W. 1984. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.
  • Blows, M.W. 2007. A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 18.
  • Blows, M.W. & Higgie, M. 2003. Genetic constraints on the evolution of mate recognition under natural selection. Am. Nat. 161: 240253.
  • Blows, M.W., Chenoweth, S.F. & Hine, E. 2004. Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits. Am. Nat. 163: 329340.
  • Cheetham, A.H., Jackson, J.B.C. & Hayek, L.C. 1993. Quantitative genetics of bryozoan phenotypic evolution. I. Rate tests for random change versus selection in differentiation of living species. Evolution 47: 15261538.
  • Chernoff, B. & Magwene, P.M. 1999. Morphological integration: forty years later. Afterword in: Morphological Integration (E.C.Olson & R.L.Miller, eds), pp. 316360. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Cheverud, J.M. 1996. Quantitative genetic analysis of cranial morphology in the cotton-top (Saguinus oedipus) and saddle-back (S. fuscicollis) tamarins. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 542.
  • Cheverud, J.M. & Marroig, G. 2007. Comparing covariance matrices: random skewers method compared to the common principal components model. Genet. Mol. Biol. 30: 461469.
  • Cheverud, J.M., Rutledge, J.J. & Atchley, W.R. 1983. Quantitative genetics of development: genetic correlations among age-specific trait values and the evolution of ontogeny. Evolution 37: 895905.
  • Cheverud, J.M., Wagner, G.P. & Dow, M.M. 1989. Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns. Syst. Zool. 38: 201213.
  • Coltman, D.W., O'Donoghue, P., Hogg, J.T. & Festa-Bianchet, M. 2005. Selection and genetic (CO)variance in bighorn sheep. Evolution 59: 13721382.
  • Eaton, M.L. 1983. Multivariate Statistics: A Vector Space Approach. Wiley, New York.
  • Estes, S. & Arnold, S.J. 2007. Resolving the paradox of stasis: models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary divergence on all timescales. Am. Nat. 169: 227244.
  • Flury, B.D. 1984. Common principal components in k groups. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 79: 892898.
  • Flury, B. 1988. Common Principal Components and Related Multivariate Models. Wiley, New York.
  • Foerster, K., Coulson, T., Sheldon, B.C., Pemberton, J.M., Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Kruuk, L.E.B. 2007. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature 447: 11071109.
  • Galis, F., Van Dooren, T.J.M., Feuth, J.D., Metz, J.A.J., Witkam, A., Ruinard, S., Steigenga, M.J. & Wijnaendts, L.C.D. 2006. Extreme selection in humans against homeotic transformations of cervical vertebrae. Evolution 60: 26432654.
  • Hallgrímsson, B. & Hall, B.K. 2005. Variation. Elsevier Academic, Amsterdam.
  • Hand, D.J. 2004. Measurement Theory and Practice: The World Through Quantification. Arnold, London.
  • Hansen, T.F. 2003. Is modularity necessary for evolvability? Remarks on the relationship between pleiotropy and evolvability. Biosystems 69: 8394.
  • Hansen, T.F. 2006. The evolution of genetic architecture. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37: 123157.
  • Hansen, T.F. & Houle, D. 2004. Evolvability, stabilizing selection, and the problem of stasis. In: The Evolutionary Biology of Complex Phenotypes (M.Pigliucci & K.Preston, eds), pp. 130150. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Hansen, T.F., Armbruster, W.S., Carlson, M.L. & Pélabon, C. 2003a. Evolvability and genetic constraint in Dalechampia blossoms: genetic correlations and conditional evolvability. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 296B: 2339.
  • Hansen, T.F., Pélabon, C., Armbruster, W.S. & Carlson, M.L. 2003b. Evolvability and genetic constraint in Dalechampia blossoms: components of variance and measures of evolvability. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 754766.
  • Hereford, J., Hansen, T.F. & Houle, D. 2004. Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong? Evolution 58: 21332143.
  • Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195204.
  • Houle, D., Mezey, J. & Galpern, P. 2002. Interpreting the results of common principal component analyses. Evolution 56: 433440.
  • Houle, D., Mezey, J., Galpern, P. & Carter, A. 2003. Automated measurement of Drosophila wings. BMC Evol. Biol. 3: 25.
  • Hunt, G. 2007. Evolutionary divergence in directions of high phenotypic variance in the ostracode genus Poseidonamicus. Evolution 61: 15601576.
  • Jensen, H., Sæther, B.-E., Ringsby, T.H., Tufto, J., Griffith, S.G. & Ellegren, H. 2003. Sexual variation in heritability and genetic correlations of morphological traits in house sparrow (Passer domesticus). J. Evol. Biol. 16: 12961307.
  • Jones, A.G., Arnold, S.J. & Bürger, R. 2003. Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift. Evolution 57: 17471760.
  • Jones, A.G., Arnold, S.J. & Bürger, R. 2004. Evolution and stability of the G-matrix on a landscape with a moving optimum. Evolution 58: 16391654.
  • Jones, A.G., Arnold, S.J. & Bürger, R. 2007. The mutation matrix and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 61: 727745.
  • Kingsolver, J.G., Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hill, C.E., Hoang, A., Gibert, P. & Beerli, P. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157: 245261.
  • Kirkpatrick, M. 2008. Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions. Genetica.
  • Klingenberg, C.P. & Leamy, L.J. 2001. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Evolution 55: 23422352.
  • Lande, R. 1976. The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet. Res. 26: 221235.
  • Lande, R. 1977. On comparing coefficients of variation. Syst. Zool. 26: 214217.
  • Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402416.
  • Lande, R. 1980. The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94: 203215.
  • Lande, R. 1988. Quantitative genetics and evolutionary theory. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quantitative Genetics (B.S.Weir, E.J.Eisen, M.M.Goodman & G.Namkoong, eds), pp. 7184. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 12101226.
  • Van Der Linde, K. & Houle, D. 2008. A phylogeny of the genus Drosophila and some closely related genera. J. Insect Syst., accepted.
  • Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Magwene, P.M. 2001. New tools for studying integration and modularity. Evolution 55: 17171733.
  • Marroig, G. & Cheverud, J.M. 2005. Size as a line of least evolutionary resistance: diet and adaptive morphological radiation in new world monkeys. Evolution 59: 11281142.
  • McGuigan, K., Chenoweth, S.F. & Blows, M.W. 2005. Phenotypic divergence along lines of genetic variance. Am. Nat. 165: 3243.
  • Mezey, J.G. & Houle, D. 2003. Comparing G matrices: are common principal components informative? Genetics 165: 411425.
  • Mezey, J.G. & Houle, D. 2005. The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59: 10271038.
  • Mitteroecker, P. & Bookstein, F. 2007. The conceptual and statistical relationship between modularity and morphological integration. Syst. Biol. 56: 818836.
  • Olson, E.D. & Miller, R.L. 1958. Morphological Integration. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Phillips, P.C. & Arnold, S.J. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance–covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53: 15061515.
  • Rønning, B., Jensen, H., Moe, B. & Bech, C. 2007. Basal metabolic rate: heritability and genetic correlations with morphological traits in the zebra finch. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 18151822.
  • Rolff, J., Armitage, S.A.O. & Coltman, D.W. 2005. Genetic constraints and sexual dimorphism in immune defence. Evol. Dev. 59: 18441850.
  • Sarle, W.S. 1997. Measurement theory: frequently asked questions. Available at: ftp://ftp.sas.com/pub/neural/measurement.html.
  • Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50: 17661774.
  • Schluter, D. 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Steppan, S.J., Phillips, P.C. & Houle, D. 2002. Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 320327.
  • Stevens, S.S. 1946. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103: 677680.
  • Stevens, S.S. 1959. Measurement, psychophysics and utility. In: Measurement: Definitions and Theories (C.W.Churchman & P.Ratoosh, eds), pp. 1863. Wiley, New York.
  • Stevens, S.S. 1968. Measurement, statistics, and the schemiparic view. Science 161: 849856.
  • Turelli, M. 1984. Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25: 138193.
  • Turelli, M. 1985. Effects of pleiotropy on predictions concerning mutation–selection balance for polygenic traits. Genetics 111: 165195.
  • Turelli, M. 1988a. Phenotypic evolution, constant covariances and the maintenance of additive variance. Evolution 42: 13421347.
  • Turelli, M. 1988b. Population genetic models for polygenic variation and evolution. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quantitative Genetics (B.S.Weir, E.J.Eisen, M.J.Goodman & G.Namkoong, eds), pp. 601618. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Van Valen, L. 1978. The statistics of variation. Evol. Theory 4: 3343.
  • Van Valen, L. 2005. The statistics of variation. In: Variation (B.Hallgrímsson & B.K.Hall, eds), pp. 2947. Elsevier Academic, Amsterdam.
  • Wagner, G.P. 1984. On the eigenvalue distribution of genetic and phenotypic dispersion matrices: evidence for a nonrandom organization of quantitative character variation. J. Math. Biol. 21: 7795.
  • Wagner, G.P. & Altenberg, L. 1996. Perspective: complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50: 967976.
  • Zelditch, M.L. 1987. Evaluating models of developmental integration in the laboratory rat using confirmatory factor analysis. Syst. Zool. 36: 368380.
  • Zhivotovsky, L.A. 1988. Some methods of analysis of correlated characters. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Quantitative Genetics (S.J.Arnold, B.S.Weir, E.J.Eisen, M.M.Goodman & G.Namkoong, eds), pp. 423432. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.