SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alcorn, S.M., Orum, T.V., Steigerwalt, A.G., Foster, J.L.M., Fogleman, J.C. & Brenner, D.J. 1991. Taxonomy and pathogenicity of Erwinia cacticida sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41: 197212.
  • Alonso-Pimentel, H. & Tobin, T.R. 1992. Discriminant function analysis of the courtship behavior of Drosophila mojavensis (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Insect Behav. 5: 131139.
  • Antony, C. & Jallon, J.-M. 1982. The chemical basis for sex recognition in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 28: 873880.
  • Basolo, A.L. 1995. Phylogenetic evidence for the role of a pre-existing bias in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 259: 307311.
  • Blows, M.W. 2002. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 11131118.
  • Blows, M.W. & Higgie, M. 2002. Evolutionary experiments on mate recognition in the Drosophila serrata species complex. In: Genetics of Mate Choice: From Sexual Selection to Sexual Isolation (W.J.Etges & M.A.F.Noor, eds), pp. 239250. Kluwer, New York.
  • Boake, C.R.B., DeAngelis, M.P. & Andreadis, D.K. 1997. Is sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? Mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94: 1244212445.
  • Boughman, J.W. 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411: 944948.
  • Boughman, J.W. 2002. How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 571577.
  • Boul, K.E., Funk, W.C., Darst, C.R., Cannatella, D.C. & Ryan, M.J. 2007. Sexual selection drives speciation in an Amazonian frog. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274: 399406.
  • Brazner, J.C. & Etges, W.J. 1993. Pre-mating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. II. Effects of larval substrates on time to copulation, mate choice, and mating propensity. Evol. Ecol. 7: 605624.
  • Carson, H.L. 1978. Speciation and sexual selection in Hawaiian Drosophila. In: Ecological Genetics: The Interface (P.F.Brussard, ed.), pp. 93107. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Carson, H.L. 2000. Sexual selection in populations: the facts require a change in the genetic definition of the species. In: Evolutionary Genetics: From Molecules to Morphology (R.S.Singh & C.Krimbas, eds), pp. 495512. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Carvajal-Rodríguez, A. & Rolán-Alvarez, E. 2006. jmating: a software for detailed analysis of sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequency data. BMC Evol. Biol. 6: 40.
  • Costanza, M.C. & Afifi, A.A. 1979. Comparison of stopping rules in forward stepwise discriminant analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74: 777785.
  • Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Coyne, J.A., Crittenden, A.P. & Mah, K. 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265: 14611464.
  • Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Etges, W.J. 1990. Direction of life history evolution in Drosophila mojavensis. In: Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila (J.S.F.Barker, W.T.Starmer & R.J.MacIntyre, eds), pp. 3756. Plenum, New York.
  • Etges, W.J. 1992. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 46: 19451950.
  • Etges, W.J. 1998. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. IV. Correlated responses in behavioral isolation to artificial selection on a life history trait. Am. Nat. 152: 129144.
  • Etges, W.J. & Ahrens, M.A. 2001. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. V. Deep geographic variation in epicuticular hydrocarbons among isolated populations. Am. Nat. 158: 585598.
  • Etges, W.J. & Jackson, L.L. 2001. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. VI. Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation in Drosophila mojavensis cluster species. J. Chem. Ecol. 27: 21252149.
  • Etges, W.J., Johnson, W.R., Duncan, G.A., Huckins, G. & Heed, W.B. 1999. Ecological genetics of cactophilic Drosophila. In: Ecology of Sonoran Desert Plants and Plant Communities (R.Robichaux, ed.), pp. 164214. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
  • Etges, W.J., Over, K.F., De Oliveira, C.C. & Ritchie, M.G. 2006. Inheritance of courtship song variation among geographically isolated populations of Drosophila mojavensis. Anim. Behav. 71: 2051214.
  • Etges, W.J., De Oliveira, C.C., Gragg, E., Ortíz-Barrientos, D., Noor, M.A.F. & Ritchie, M.G. 2007. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success and genotype × environment interactions. Evolution 61: 11061119.
  • Ewing, A.W. & Miyan, J.A. 1986. Sexual selection, sexual isolation and the evolution of song in the Drosophila repleta group of species. Anim. Behav. 34: 421429.
  • Fellows, D.P. & Heed, W.B. 1972. Factors affecting host plant selection in desert-adapted cactophilic Drosophila. Ecology 53: 850858.
  • Ferveur, J.-F. 2007. Elements of courtship behavior in Drosophila. In: Invertebrate Neurobiology, Vol. Monograph 49 (G.North & R.J.Greenspan, eds), pp. 405436. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
  • Gerhardt, H.C. & Huber, F. 2002. Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Heed, W.B. 1982. The origin of Drosophila in the Sonoran Desert. In: Ecological Genetics and Evolution: The Cactus-Yeast-Drosophila Model System (J.S.F.Barker & W.T.Starmer, eds), pp. 6580. Academic Press, Sydney.
  • Higgie, M., Chenoweth, S. & Blows, M.W. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290: 519521.
  • Howard, D.J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (R.G.Harrison, ed.), pp. 4669. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Howard, R.W., Jackson, L.L., Banse, H. & Blows, M.W. 2003. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila birchii and D. serrata: identification and role in mate choice in D. serrata. J. Chem. Ecol. 29: 961976.
  • Knowles, L.L. & Markow, T.A. 2001. Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98: 86928696.
  • Krebs, R.A. & Markow, T.A. 1989. Courtship behavior and control of reproductive isolation in Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 43: 908912.
  • Machado, C.A., Matzkin, L.M., Reed, L.K. & Markow, T.A. 2007. Multilocus nuclear sequences reveal intra- and interspecific relationships among chromosomally polymorphic species of cactophilic Drosophila. Mol. Ecol. 16: 30093024.
  • Markow, T.A. 1981. Courtship behavior and control of reproductive isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis. Evolution 35: 10221027.
  • Markow, T.A. 1991. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 45: 15251529.
  • Markow, T.A. & Toolson, E.C. 1990. Temperature effects on epicuticular hydrocarbons and sexual isolation in Drosophila mojavensis. In: Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila, Monographs in Evolutionary Biology (J.S.F.Barker, W.T.Starmer & R.J.MacIntyre, eds), pp. 315331. Plenum, New York.
  • Markow, T.A., Fogleman, J.C. & Heed, W.B. 1983. Reproductive isolation in Sonoran Desert Drosophila. Evolution 37: 649652.
  • Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Nemoto, T., Doi, M., Oshio, K., Matsubayashi, H., Oguma, Y., Suzuki, T. & Kuwahara, Y. 1994. (Z,Z)-5,27-Tritriacontadiene: major sex pheromone of Drosophila pallidosa (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 20: 30293037.
  • Noor, M.A.F. 1999. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83: 503508.
  • Oguma, Y., Nemoto, T. & Kuwahara, Y. 1992. A sex pheromone study of a fruit-fly Drosophila virilis Sturtevant (Diptera: Drosophilidae): additive effect of cuticular alkadienes to the major sex pheromone. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 27: 499505.
  • Panhuis, T.M., Butlin, R., Zuk, M. & Tregenza, T. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 364371.
  • Paterson, H.E.H. 1993. Evolution and the Recognition Concept of Species: Collected Writings. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
  • Ritchie, M.G. 2007. Sexual selection and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 79102.
  • Rolan-Alvarez, E. & Caballero, A. 2000. Estimating sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequencies. Evolution 54: 3036.
  • Ruiz, A. & Heed, W.B. 1988. Host-plant specificity in the cactophilic Drosophila mulleri species complex. J. Anim. Ecol. 57: 237249.
  • Ruiz, A., Heed, W.B. & Wasserman, M. 1990. Evolution of the mojavensis cluster of cactophilic Drosophila with descriptions of two new species. J. Hered. 81: 3042.
  • Ryan, M.J. 1998. Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science 281: 19992003.
  • Ryan, M.J. & Rand, A.S. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47: 647657.
  • Sætre, G.-P., Moum, T., Bures, S., Kral, M., Adamjan, M. & Moreno, J. 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387: 589592.
  • SAS-Institute 2004. SAS/STAT 9.1.2. pp. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  • Servedio, M.R. & Noor, M.A.F. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 339364.
  • Spieth, H.T. 1952. Mating behavior within the genus Drosophila (Diptera). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 99: 395474.
  • Starmer, W.T. 1982. Analysis of community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. I. Stenocereus gummosus. Microb. Ecol. 8: 7181.
  • Stennett, M.D. & Etges, W.J. 1997. Pre-mating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. III. Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation is determined by use of different host plants in Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae. J. Chem. Ecol. 23: 28032824.
  • Tompkins, L., McRobert, S.P. & Kaneshiro, K.Y. 1993. Chemical communication in Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution 47: 14071419.
  • Toolson, E.C., Markow, T.A., Jackson, L.L. & Howard, R.W. 1990. Epicuticular hydrocarbon composition of wild and laboratory-reared Drosophila mojavensis Patterson and Crow (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 83: 11651176.
  • Wasserman, M. & Koepfer, H.R. 1977. Character displacement for sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis. Evolution 31: 812823.
  • West-Eberhard, M.J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58: 155183.
  • Zouros, E. & D’Entremont, C.J. 1974. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis race B. Dros. Inf. Serv. 51: 112.
  • Zouros, E. & D’Entremont, C.J. 1980. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis: response to pressure from a related species. Evolution 34: 421430.