SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Benton, M.J. 2000. Vertebrate Palaeontology, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Inc., Malden, MA.
  • Benton, M.J. & Clark, J.M. 1988 Archosaur phylogeny and the relationships of the Crocodylia. In: The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 1 (M.J.Benton, ed.). pp. 295338. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Brochu, C.A. 1995. Heterochrony in the crocodylian scapulocoracoid. J. Herpetol. 29: 464468.
  • Brochu, C.A. 1997. Morphology, fossils, divergence timing, and the phylogenetic relationships of Gavialis. Syst. Biol. 46: 479522.
  • Brochu, C.A. 1999. Taxon sampling and reverse successive weighting. Syst. Biol. 48: 808813.
  • Brochu, C.A. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence timing of Crocodylus based on morphology and the fossil record. Copeia 2000: 657673.
  • Brochu, C.A. 2001a. Crocodylian snouts in space and time: phylogenetic approaches toward adaptive radiation. Am. Zool. 41: 564585.
  • Brochu, C.A. 2001b. Progress and future directions in archosaur phylogenetics. J. Paleontol. 75: 11851201.
  • Brochu, C.A. 2003. Phylogenetic approaches toward crocodylian history. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 31: 357397.
  • Busbey, A.B. 1995 The structural consequences of skull flattening in crocodilians. In: Functional Morphology in Vertebrate Paleontology (J.J.Thomason, ed.), pp. 173192. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Clark, J.M. 1986 Phylogenetic Relationships of the Crocodylomorph Archosaurs, pp. 556. University of Chicago, PhD Thesis.
  • Clark, J.M. 1994 Patterns of evolution in Mesozoic Crocodyliformes. In: In the Shadow of the Dinosaurs: Early Mesozoic Tetrapods (N.C.Fraser & H.-D.Sues, eds). pp. 8497. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Cope, E.D. 1861. Recent species of Emydosaurian reptiles represented in the museum of the academy. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 12: 549551.
  • Crandall, K.A. 2002 Convergent and parallel evolution. In: Encyclopedia of Evolution, Vol. 1 (M.Pagel, ed.), pp. 201205. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Cubo, J. & Arthur, W. 2000. Patterns of correlated character evolution in flightless birds: a phylogenetic approach. Evol. Ecol. 14: 693702.
  • Cuvier, G.L.C.F.D. 1807. Sur les différentes especes de crocodiles vivans et sur leurs caracteres distinctifs. Ann. Natl Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris 10: 886.
  • Cuvier, G.L.C.F.D. 1825. Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles de quadrupèdes, où l’on rétablit les caractères du plusieurs espèces d’animaux que les révolutions du globe paroissent avoir détruites, 3rd edn. Dufour & d’Ocagne, Paris.
  • Daudin, F.M. 1802. Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particulière des Reptiles; ouvrage faisant suit à l’Histoire naturell générale et particulière, composée par Leclerc de Buffon; et rédigee par C.S. Sonnini, membre de plusieurs sociétés savantess. F. Dufart, Paris.
  • Densmore, L.D. & Owen, R.D. 1989. Molecular systematics of the order Crocodilia. Am. Zool. 29: 831841.
  • Densmore, L.D. & White, P.S. 1991. The systematics and evolution of the Crocodilia as suggested by restriction endonuclease analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Copeia 1991: 602615.
  • Donoghue, M.J., Doyle, J.A., Gauthier, J., Kluge, A.G. & Rowe, T. 1989. The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 431460.
  • Emerson, S.B. & Hastings, P.A. 1998. Morphological correlations in evolution: consequences for phylogenetic analysis. Q. Rev. Biol. 73: 141162.
  • Felsenstein, J. 1973. Maximum likelihood and minimum-steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Syst. Zool. 22: 240249.
  • Gatesy, J., Amato, G., Norell, M., DeSalle, R. & Hayashi, C. 2003. Combined support for wholesale taxic atavism in gavialine crocodylians. Syst. Biol. 52: 403422.
  • Gauthier, J., Kluge, A.G. & Rowe, T. 1988. Amniote phylogency and the importance of fossils. Cladistics 4: 105209.
  • Gmelin, S.G. 1789. In: Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus 1, Pars III. Editio decima tertia, aucta, reformata (C.LInnaeus, ed.), pp. 10331516. Emanuel Beer, Lipsiae [Leipzig].
  • Graves, M.L. 1819. Sur deux nouvelles espèces de crocodile. Ann. Gen. Sci. Phys. Bruxelles 2: 343353.
  • Hall, B.K. 1995. Atavisms and atavistic mutations. Nat. Genet. 10: 126127.
  • Hall, B.K. 2003. Unlocking the black box between genotype and phenotype: cell condensations as morphogenetic (modular) units. Biol. Philos. 18: 219247.
  • Harris, S.R., Wilkinson, M. & Marques, A.C. 2003. Countering concerted homoplasy. Cladistics 19: 128130.
  • Harshman, J., Huddleston, C.J., Bollback, J.P., Parsons, T.J. & Braun, M.J. 2003. True and false gharials: a nuclear gene phylogeny of Crocodylia. Syst. Biol. 52: 386402.
  • Hillis, D.M. & Wiens, J.J. 2000. Molecules versus morphology in systematics: conflicts, artifacts, and misconceptions. In: Phylogenetic Analysis of Morphological Data (J.J.Wiens, ed.), pp. 119. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  • Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Nielsen, R. 1999. Effect of nonindependent substitution on phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 48: 317328.
  • Hutchinson, J.H. 1992. Western North American reptile and amphibian record across the Eocene-Oligocene boundary and its climatic implications. In: Eocene-Oligocene Climatic and Biotic Evolution (D.R.Prothero & W.A.Berggren, eds), pp. 451463. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Kluge, A.G. & Farris, J.S. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18: 132.
  • Krefft, G. 1873. Remarks on Australian crocodiles, and description of a new species. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1873: 334335.
  • Langston, W. 1973. The crocodilian skull in historical perspective. In: Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 4 (C.Gans & T.Parsons, eds.), pp. 263284. Academic Press, London.
  • Larsson, H.C.E. 1998. A new method for comparing ontogenetic and phylogenetic data and its application to the evolution of the crocodilian palate. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Palaontol., Abh. 210: 345368.
  • Laurenti, J.N. 1768. Specimen medicum, exhibens synopsin reptilium emendatam cum experimentis circa venena et antidota reptilium austracorum, quod authoritate et consensu. Thomaei, Vienna.
  • Lorch, P.D. & Eadie, J.M. 1999. Power of concentrated changes test for correlated evolution. Syst. Biol. 48: 170191.
  • Maddison, W.P. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? Evolution 44: 539557.
  • Maddison, W.P. 2000. Testing character correlation using pairwise comparisons on a phylogeny. J. Theor. Biol. 202: 195204.
  • Maddison, D.R. & Maddison, W.P. 2000. MacClade Version 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. pp. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2008. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 2.5. URL http://mesquiteproject.org (Last accessed 30 July 2008)
  • Markwick, P.J. 1998. Crocodilian diversity in space and time: the role of climate in paleoecology and its implication for understanding K/T extinctions. Paleobiology 24: 470497.
  • McAliley, L.R., Willis, R.E., Ray, D.A., White, P.S., Brochu, C.A. & Densmore, L.D. 2006. Are crocodiles really monophyletic? Evidence for subdivisions from sequence and morphological data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 39: 1632.
  • Monteiro, L.R. & Soares, M. 1997. Allometric analysis of the ontogenetic variation and evolution of the skull in caimin, spix, 1825 (Crocodylia: Alligatoridae). Herpetologica 53: 6269.
  • Monteiro, L.R., Cavalcanti, M.J. & Sommer, H.J.S. 1997. Comparative ontogenetic shape changes in the skull of Caiman species (Crocodylia, Alligatoridae). J. Morphol. 231: 5362.
  • Mook, C.C. 1921. Individual and age variations in the skulls of recent crocodilia. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 44: 5166.
  • Müller, S. 1838. Waarnemingen over de Indische Krokodillen en Beschrijving Van Enne Nieuwe Soort. Tijdschrift voor Natuurlijke Geschiedenis en Physiologie, Amsterdam and Leyden 5: 6287.
  • Norell, M.A. 1989. The higher level relationships of the extant Crocodylia. J. Herpetol. 23: 325335.
  • O’Keefe, F.R. & Wagner, P.J. 2001. Inferring and testing hypotheses of cladistic character dependence by using character compatibility. Syst. Biol. 50: 657675.
  • Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies – a general-method for the comparative-analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 255: 3745.
  • Pierce, S.E., Angielczyk, K.D. & Rayfield, E.J. 2008. Patterns of morphospace occupation and mechanical performance in extant crocodilian skulls: a combined geometric morphometric and finite element modeling approach. J. Morphol. 269: 840864.
  • Poe, S. 1996. Date set incongruence and the phylogeny of crocodilians. Syst. Biol. 45: 393414.
  • Pooley, A.C. 1989. Food and feeding habits. In: Crocodiles and Alligators (C.A.Ross, ed.), pp. 6791. Facts on File, New York.
  • Read, A.F. & Nee, S. 1995. Inference from binary comparative data. J. Theor. Biol. 173: 99108.
  • Ricklefs, R.E. 1990. Ecology, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman, New York.
  • Rieppel, O. 1993. Studies on skeleton formation in reptiles.V. Patterns of ossification in the skeleton of Alligator-mississippiensis Daudin (Reptilia, Crocodylia). Zool J. Linn. Soc. 109: 301325.
  • Salisbury, S.W. & Willis, P.M.A. 1996. A new crocodylian from the early Eocene of south-eastern Queensland and a preliminary investigation of the phylogenetic relationships of crocodyloids. Alcheringa 20: 179226.
  • Smith, A.B. 1998. The adequacy of the fossil record. Nature 395: 340341.
  • Sneath, P.H.A. & Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
  • Sneath, P.H.A., Sackin, M.J. & Ambler, R.P. 1975. Detecting evolutionary incompatibilities from protein sequences. Syst. Zool. 24: 311332.
  • Sues, H.-D. 1989. The place of crocodilians in the living world. In: Crocodiles and Alligators (C.A.Ross, ed.), pp. 6791. Facts on File, New York.
  • Taplin, L.E. 1984. Evolution and zoogeography of crocodilians: a new look at an ancient order. In: Vertebrate Zoogeography and Evolution in Australasia (M.Archer & G.Clayton, eds), pp. 361370. Hesperian, Victoria Park, Western Australia.
  • Tarsitano, S.F., Frey, E. & Riess, J. 1989. The evolution of the Crocodilia – a conflict between morphological and biochemical data. Am. Zool. 29: 843856.
  • Trueman, J.W.H. 1998. Reverse successive weighting. Syst. Biol. 47: 733737.
  • Vickaryous, M.K. & Hall, B.K. 2008. Development of the dermal skeleton in Alligator mississippiensis (Archosauria, crocodylia) with comments on homology of osteoderms. J. Morphol. 269: 39–422.
  • Wagner, P.J. 1998. A likelihood approach for evaluating estimates of phylogenetic relationships among fossil taxa. Paleobiology 24: 430449.
  • Wenzel, J.W. & Carpenter, J.M. 1994. Comparing methods: adaptive traits and tests of adaptation. In: Phylogenetics and Ecology (P.Eggleton & R.Vane-Wright, eds), pp. 79101. Academic Press, London.
  • Werdelin, L. & Tullberg, B.S. 1995. A comparison of two methods to study correlated discrete characters on phylogenetic trees. Cladistics 11: 265277.
  • White, P.S. & Densmore, L.D. 2001. DNA sequence alignments and data analysis methods: their effect on the recovery of crocodylian relationships. In: Crocodilian Biology and Evolution (G.Grigg, F.Seebacher & C.E.Franklin, eds), pp. 2937. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, NSW.
  • Wiens, J.J. 2004. The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 53: 653661.
  • Wiens, J.J. 2005. Can incomplete taxa rescue phylogenetic analyses from long-branch attraction? Syst. Biol. 54: 731742.
  • Willis, R.E., McAliley, L.R., Neeley, E.D. & Densmore, L.D. 2007. Evidence for placing the false gharial (Tomistoma schlegelii) into the family Gavialidae: inferences from nuclear gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 43: 787794.
  • Zhang, J.Z. & Kumar, S. 1997. Detection of convergent and parallel evolution at the amino acid sequence level. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14: 527536.