SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Badyaev, A.J. 1997. Covariation between life history and sexually selected traits: an example with cardueline finches. Oikos 80: 128138.
  • Badyaev, A.V. & Ghalambor, C.K. 1998. Does a trade-off exist between sexual ornamentation and ecological plasticity? Sexual dichromatism and occupied elevational range in finches. Oikos 82: 319324.
  • Badyaev, A.V. & Hill, G.E. 2000. Evolution of sexual dichromatism: contribution of carotenoid versus melanin-based coloration. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 69: 153172.
  • Badyaev, A.V. & Hill, G.E. 2003. Avian sexual dichromatism in relation to phylogeny and ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34: 2749.
  • Baker, M.C., Baker, M.S.A. & Tilghman, L.M. 2006. Differing effects of isolation on evolution of bird songs: examples from an island-mainland comparison of three species. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 89: 331342.
  • Bard, S.C., Hau, M., Wikelski, M. & Wingfield, J.C. 2002. Vocal distinctiveness and response to conspecific playback in the spotted antbird, a Neotropical suboscine. Condor 104: 387394.
  • Barraclough, T.G., Harvey, P.H. & Nee, S. 1995. Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 259: 211215.
  • Bennett, A.T.D. & Owens, I.P.F. 2002. Evolutionary Ecology of Birds: Life-history, Mating System and Extinction. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Bennett, A.T.D., Cuthill, I.C., Partridge, J.C. & Lunau, K. 1997. Ultraviolet plumage colors predict mate preferences instarlings. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 94: 86188621.
  • Bókony, V., Garamszegi, L.Z., Hirschenhauser, K. & Liker, A. 2008. Testosterone and melanin-based black plumage coloration: a comparative study. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 12291238.
  • Braun, M.J., Isler, M.L., Isler, P.R., Bates, J.M. & Robbins, M.B. 2005. Avian speciation in the Pantepui: the case of the Roraiman antbird (Percnostola [Schistocichla] “leucostigmasaturata). Condor 107: 327341.
  • Brooks, R. 2000. Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406: 6770.
  • Brumfield, R.T. & Edwards, S.V. 2007. Evolution into and out of the Andes: a Bayesian analysis of historical diversification in Thamnophilus antshrikes. Evolution 61: 346367.
  • Brumfield, R.T., Tello, J.G., Cheviron, Z.A., Carling, M.D., Crochet, N. & Rosenberg, K.V. 2007. Phylogenetic conservatism and antiquity of a tropical specialization: army-ant-following in the typical antbirds (Thamnophilidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 45: 113.
  • Brush, A.H. 1978. Avian pigmentation. In: Chemical Zoology (A.H.Brush, ed.), pp. 141161. Academic Press, New York.
  • Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. 2004. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods Res 33: 261304.
  • Burns, K.J. 1998. A phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual dichromatism in tanagers (Thraupidae): the role of female versus male plumage. Evolution 52: 12191224.
  • Candolin, U. & Heuschele, J. 2008. Is sexual selection beneficial during adaptation to environmental change? Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 446452.
  • Catchpole, C.K. & Slater, P.J.B. 1995. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Clement, P., Harris, A. & Davis, J. 1993. Finches and Sparrows: An Identification Guide. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Collins, S. 2004. Vocal fighting and flirting: the functions of birdsong. In: Nature’s Music: The Science of Birdsong (P.Marler & H.Slabbekoorn, eds), pp. 3979. Elsevier, London.
  • Cramp, S. & Perrins, C.M. 1994. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 8. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Cuthill, I.C., Partridge, J.C., Bennett, A.T.D., Church, S.C., Hart, N.S. & Hunt, S. 2000. Ultraviolet vision in Birds. Adv. Stud. Behav. 29: 159215.
  • Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Natural Selection. John Murray & Sons, London.
  • Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray & Sons, London.
  • Doherty, P.F., Sorci, G., Royle, J.A., Hines, J.E., Nichols, J.D. & Boulinier, T. 2003. Sexual selection affects local extinction and turnover in bird communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 100: 58585862.
  • Doucet, S.M., Mennill, D.J., Montgomerie, R., Boag, P.T. & Ratcliffe, L.M. 2005. Achromatic plumage reflectance predicts reproductive success in male black-capped chickadees. Behav. Ecol. 16: 218222.
  • Dunn, P.O., Whittingham, L.A. & Pitcher, T.E. 2001. Mating systems, sperm competition and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution 55: 161175.
  • Dunning, J.B. 1993. CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  • Eaton, M.D. 2005. Human vision fails to distinguish widespread sexual dichromatism among sexually “monochromatic” birds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 102: 1094210946.
  • Eshel, I. 1979. Sexual selection, population density, and availability of mates. J. Theor. Popul. Biol. 16: 301314.
  • Fedy, B.C. & Stutchbury, B.J.M. 2004. Territory switching and floating in white-bellied antbird (Myrmeciza longipes), a resident tropical passerine in Panama. Auk 121: 486496.
  • Fedy, B.C. & Stutchbury, B.J.M. 2005. Territory defence in tropical birds: are females as aggressive as males? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58: 414422.
  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 125.
  • Felsenstein, J. 2008. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised. Am. Nat. 171: 713725.
  • Fisher, R.A. 1915. The evolution of sexual preference. Eugen. Rev. 7: 184192.
  • Fisher, R.A. 1930. The Genetic Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Fox, H.M. & Vevers, G. 1960. The Nature of Animal Colours. Sidwick & Jackson Limited, London.
  • Freckleton, R.P., Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M.D. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160: 712726.
  • Fricke, C. & Arnqvist, G. 2007. Rapid adaptation to a novel host in a seed beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus): the role of sexual selection. Evolution 61: 440454.
  • Garamszegi, L.Z., Hegyi, G., Heylen, D., Ninni, P., De Lope, F., Eens, M. & Møller, A.P. 2006. The design of complex sexual traits in male barn swallows: associations between signal attributes. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 20522066.
  • Garamszegi, L.Z., Pavlova, D.Z., Eens, M. & Møller, A.P. 2007. The evolution of song in female birds in Europe. Behav. Ecol. 18: 8696.
  • Garland, T., Harvey, P.H. & Ives, A.R. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41: 1832.
  • Gavrilets, S., Arnqvist, G. & Friberg, U. 2001. The evolution of female choice by sexual conflict. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 531539.
  • Gil, D. & Gahr, M. 2002. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 133141.
  • Gomez, D. & Théry, M. 2007. Simultaneous crypsis and conspicuousness in color patterns: comparative analysis of a Neotropical rainforest bird community. Am. Nat. 169: S42S61.
  • Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 326: 119157.
  • Grafen, A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 144: 517546.
  • Gray, D.A. 1996. Carotenoids and sexual dichromatism in North American passerine birds. Am. Nat. 148: 453480.
  • Griffith, S.C., Parker, T.H. & Olson, V.A. 2006. Melanin- versus carotenoid-based sexual signals: is the difference really so black and red? Anim. Behav. 71: 749763.
  • Haldane, J.B.S. 1932. The Causes of Evolution. Harper, London.
  • Hamao, S. & Ueda, K. 2000. Simplified song in an island population of the bush warbler Cettia diphone. J. Ethol. 18: 5357.
  • Hamilton, W.D. & Zuk, M. 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218: 384387.
  • Handford, P. & Lougheed, S.C. 1991. Variation in duration and frequency characters in the song of the rufous-collared sparrow Zonotrichia capensis, with respect to habitat, trill dialects and body size. Condor 93: 644658.
  • Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M.D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Harvey, P.H. & Rambaut, A. 2000. Comparative analyses for adaptive radiations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 355: 15991605.
  • Holland, B. 2002. Sexual selection fails to promote adaptation to a new environment. Evolution 56: 721730.
  • Holland, B. & Rice, W.R. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 96: 50835088.
  • Houle, D. & Kondrashov, A.S. 2001. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 97104.
  • Irestedt, M., Fjeldså, J., Johansson, U.S. & Erickson, P.G.P. 2002. Systematic relationships and biogeography of the tracheophone suboscines. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 23: 499512.
  • Irestedt, M., Fjeldså, J., Nylander, J.A.A. & Ericson, P.G.P. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of typical antbirds (Thamnophilidae) and test of incongruence based on Bayes factors. BMC Evol. Biol. 4: 23.
  • Isler, P.R. & Whitney, B.M. 2002. Songs of the Antbirds: Thamnophilidae, Formicariidae and Conopophagidae. Library of Natural Sounds, Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.
  • Isler, M.L., Isler, P.R. & Whitney, B.M. 1998. Use of vocalizations to establish species limits in antbirds (Passeriformes, Thamnophilidae). Auk 115: 577590.
  • Isler, M.L., Isler, P.R. & Whitney, B.M. 1999. Species limits in antbirds (Passeriformes: Thamnophilidae): the Myrmotherula surinamensis complex. Auk 116: 8396.
  • Isler, M.L., Isler, P.R., Whitney, B.M. & Walker, B. 2001. Species limits in antbirds: the Thamnophilus punctatus complex continued. Condor 103: 278286.
  • Isler, M.L., Alonso, J.A., Isler, P.R., Valqui, T., Begazo, A. & Whitney, B.M. 2002. Rediscovery of a cryptic species and description of a new subspecies in the Myrmeciza hemimelaena (Thamnophilidae) of the Neotropics. Auk 119: 362378.
  • Isler, M.L., Isler, P.R. & Brumfield, R.T. 2005. Clinal variation in vocalizations of an antbird (Thamnophilidae) and implications for defining species limits. Auk 122: 433444.
  • Isler, M.L., Isler, P.R. & Whitney, B.M. 2007a. Species limits in antbirds (Thamnophilidae): the Hypocnemis cantator complex. Auk 124: 1128.
  • Isler, M.L., Isler, P.R., Whitney, B.M. & Zimmer, K.J. 2007b. Species limits in the “Schistocichla” complex of Percnostola antbirds (Passeriformes: Thamnophilidae). Wilson J. Ornithol. 119: 5370.
  • Isler, M.L., Lacerda, D.R., Isler, P.R., Hackett, S.J., Rosenberg, K.V. & Brumfield, R.T. 2007c. Epinecrophylla, a new genus of antwrens (Aves: Passeriformes: Thamnophilidae). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 119: 522527.
  • Iwasa, Y. & Pomiankowski, A. 1994. The evolution of male preferences for multiple sexual ornaments. Evolution 48: 853867.
  • Iwasa, Y. & Pomiankowski, A. 1999. Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution. J. Theor. Biol. 200: 97109.
  • Jawor, J.M. & Breitwisch, R. 2003. Melanin ornaments, honesty and sexual selection. Auk 120: 249265.
  • Kingma, S.A., Szentirmai, I., Székely, T., Bókony, V., Bleeker, M., Liker, A. & Komdeur, J. 2008. Sexual selection and the function of a melanin-based plumage ornament in polygamous penduline tits Remiz pendulinus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 12771288.
  • Kirkpatrick, M. & Ryan, M.J. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350: 3338.
  • Kokko, H. & Brooks, R. 2003. Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 40: 207219.
  • Kokko, H. & Johnston, R.A. 2002. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357: 319330.
  • Kroodsma, D.E. 2004. The diversity and plasticity of birdsong. In: Nature’s Music: The Science of Birdsong (P.Marler & H.Slabbekoorn, eds), pp. 108131. Academic Press, London.
  • Kvarnemo, C. & Ahnesjö, I. 1996. The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 404408.
  • Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292305.
  • Liker, A. & Székely, T. 2005. Mortality costs of sexual selection and parental care in natural populations of birds. Evol. Biol. 59: 890897.
  • Lorch, P.D., Proulx, S., Rowe, L. & Day, T. 2003. Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5: 867881.
  • Martin, T.E. & Badyaev, A.V. 1996. Sexual dichromatism in birds: importance of nest predation and nest location for females versus males. Evolution 50: 24542460.
  • Martins, E.P. & Hansen, T.F. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149: 646667.
  • Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • McGraw, K.J. 2006. Mechanics of melanin-based coloration. In: Bird Coloration, Vol. 1. Mechanisms and Measurements (G.E.Hill & K.J.McGraw, eds), pp. 243294. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • McGraw, K.J. 2008. An update on the honesty of melanin-based color signals in birds. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 21: 133138.
  • McLain, D.K. 1993. Cope’s rule, sexual selection and the loss of ecological plasticity. Oikos 68: 490500.
  • McLain, D.K., Moulton, M.P. & Redfearn, T.P. 1995. Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in oceanic islands. Oikos 74: 2734.
  • McLain, D.K., Moulton, M.P. & Sanderson, J.G. 1999. Sexual selection and extinction: the fate of plumage-dimorphic and plumage-monomorphic birds introduced to islands. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 549565.
  • Møller, A.P. 1989. Viability costs of male tail ornaments in a swallow. Nature 339: 132135.
  • Møller, A.P. 1997. Immune defence, extra-pair paternity, and sexual selection in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 561566.
  • Morrow, E.H. & Pitcher, T.E. 2003. Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 17931799.
  • Morrow, E.H., Pitcher, T.E. & Arnqvist, G. 2003. No evidence that sexual selection is an ‘engine of speciation’ in birds. Ecol. Lett. 6: 228234.
  • Morton, E.S. 1975. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am. Nat. 109: 1734.
  • Morton, E.S., Derrickson, K.C. & Stutchbury, B.J.M. 2000. Territory switching behavior in a sedentary tropical passerine, the dusky antbird (Cercomacra tyrannina). Behav. Ecol. 11: 648653.
  • Nadeau, N., Burke, T. & Mundy, N.I. 2007. Evolution of an avian pigmentation gene correlates with a measure of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274: 18071813.
  • Olson, V.A. & Owens, I.P.F. 2005. Interspecific variation in the use of carotenoid-based coloration in birds: diet, life history and phylogeny. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 15341546.
  • Orteiza, N., Linder, J.E. & Rice, W.R. 2005. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 13151323.
  • Owens, I.P.F. & Bennett, P.M. 1994. Mortality costs of parental care and sexual dimorphism in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257: 18.
  • Pagel, M.D. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401: 877884.
  • Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. 2004. APE: an R package for analyses of phylogenetics and evolution. Bioinformatics 20: 289290.
  • Parker, G.A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (M.S.Blum & N.A.Blum, eds), pp. 123166. Academic Press, New York.
  • Parker, T.A., Stotz, D.F. & Fitzpatrick, J.W. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases. In: Neotropical Birds, Ecology and Conservation (D.F.Stotz, J.W.Fitzpatrick, T.A.ParkerIII & D.B.Moskovits, eds), pp. 113436. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Parker, T.H., Stansberry, B.M., Becker, C.D. & Gipson, P.S. 2003. Do melanin- or carotenoid-pigmented plumage ornaments signal condition and predict pairing success in the Kentucky warbler? Condor 105: 663671.
  • Phillimore, A.B., Freckleton, R.P., Orme, C.D.L. & Owens, I.P.F. 2006. Ecology predicts large-scale patterns of phylogenetic diversification in birds. Am. Nat. 168: 220229.
  • Podos, J., Huber, S.K. & Taft, B. 2004. Birdsong: the interface of evolution and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 35: 5587.
  • Pogány, A. & Székely, T. 2007. Female choice in the penduline tit Remiz pendulinus: the effects of nest size and male mask size. Behaviour 144: 411427.
  • Price, T. 1997. Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 352: 519529.
  • Price, T. 2008. Speciation in Birds. Roberts & Company Publishers, Greenwood Village, CO.
  • Promislow, D.E.L., Montgomerie, R. & Martin, T.E. 1992. Mortality costs of sexual dimorphism in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 250: 143150.
  • Promislow, D.E.L., Montgomerie, R. & Martin, T.E. 1994. Sexual selection and survival in North American waterfowl. Evolution 48: 20452050.
  • Promislow, D.E.L., Smith, E.A. & Pearse, L. 1998. Adult fitness consequences of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 95: 1068710692.
  • Proulx, S.R. 1999. Matings systems and the evolution of niche breadth. Am. Nat. 154: 8998.
  • Proulx, S.R. 2002. Niche shifts and expansion due to sexual selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4: 351369.
  • Purvis, A. & Rambaut, A. 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (caic): an Apple Macintosh application for analyzing comparative data. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 11: 247251.
  • R Development Core Team 2004. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  • Read, A.F. & Weary, D.M. 1992. The evolution of birdsong: comparative analyses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 338: 165187.
  • Reid, J.M., Arcese, P., Cassidy, A., Hiebert, S.M., Smith, J.N.M., Stoddard, P.K., Marr, A.B. & Keller, L.F. 2005. Fitness correlates of song repertoire size in free-living song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Am. Nat. 165: 299310.
  • Remsen, J.V. 2005. Pattern, process and rigor meet classification. AUK 122: 403413.
  • Remsen, J.V., Jaramillo, J.A., Nores, M., Pacheco, J.F., Robbins, M.B., Schulenburg, T.S., Stiles, F.G., Da Silva, J.M.C., Stotz, D.F. & Zimmer, K.J. 2006. A Classification of the Bird Species of South America. Available at: http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.html (accessed April 2006). American Ornithologists’ Union.
  • Rohwer, S. 1982. The evolution of reliable and unreliable badges of fighting ability. Am. Zool. 22: 531546.
  • Rosenzweig, M.L. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Rundle, H.D., Chenoweth, S.F. & Blows, M.W. 2006. The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment. Evolution 60: 22182225.
  • Searcy, W.A. & Andersson, M. 1986. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 507533.
  • Searcy, W.A. & Yasukawa, K. 1996. Song and female choice. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (D.E.Kroodsma & A.H.Miller, eds), pp. 454473. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
  • Seddon, N. 2005. Ecological adaptation and species recognition drive vocal evolution in Neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution 59: 200215.
  • Seddon, N. & Tobias, J.A. 2006. Duets defend mates in a suboscine passerine, the warbling antbird (Hypocnemis cantator). Behav. Ecol. 17: 7383.
  • Seddon, N. & Tobias, J.A. 2007. Song divergence at the edge of Amazonia: an empirical test of the peripatric speciation model. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 90: 173188.
  • Seddon, N., Merrill, R. & Tobias, J.A. 2008. Sexually selected traits predict patterns of species richness in a diverse clade of suboscine birds. Am. Nat. 171: 620631.
  • Sharp, N.P. & Agrawal, A.F. 2008. Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 62: 857867.
  • Simpson, G.G. 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Sorci, G., Møller, A.P. & Clobert, J. 1998. Plumage dichromatism of birds predicts introduction success in New Zealand. J. Anim. Ecol. 67: 263269.
  • Specht, B. 2006. Avisoft SASLabPro, version 4.15. Avisoft, Berlin, Germany.
  • Spencer, K.A., Buchanan, K.L., Leitner, S., Goldsmith, A.R. & Catchpole, C.K. 2005. Parasites affect song complexity and neural development in a songbird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272: 20372043.
  • SPSS 2007. SPSS for windows. Version 15.0. SPSS, Chicago.
  • Stotz, D.F., Fitzpatrick, J.W., Parker, T.A. III & Moskovits, D.B. 1996. Neotropical Birds: Ecology and Conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Svanback, R. & Persson, L. 2004. Individual diet specialization, niche width and population dynamics: implications for trophic polymorphisms. J. Anim. Ecol. 73: 973982.
  • Svardson, G. 1949. Competition and habitat selection in birds. Oikos 1: 157174.
  • Tanaka, Y. 1996. Sexual selection enhances population extinction in a changing environment. J. Theor. Biol. 180: 197206.
  • Tarof, S.A., Dunn, P.O. & Whittingham, L.A. 2005. Dual functions of a melanin-based ornament in the common yellowthroat. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272: 11211127.
  • Thusius, K.J., Peterson, K.A., Dunn, P.O. & Whittingham, L.A. 2001. Male mask size is correlated with mating success in the common yellowthroat. Anim. Behav. 62: 435446.
  • Veiga, J.P. & Puetra, M. 1996. Nutritional constraints determine the expression of a sexual trait in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 229234.
  • Wallace, A.R. 1889. Darwinism. Macmillan, London.
  • West-Eberhard, M.J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58: 155183.
  • Westneat, D.F. & Sherman, P.W. 2004. Density and extra-pair fertilizations in birds: a comparative analysis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 205215.
  • Whitlock, M.C. 2000. Fixation of new alleles and the extinction of small populations: drift load, beneficial alleles, and sexual selection. Evolution 54: 18551861.
  • Wikelski, M., Hau, M. & Wingfield, J.C. 1999. Social instability increases plasma testosterone in a year-round territorial Neotropical bird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 551556.
  • Wiley, R.H. 1991. Associations of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of Eastern North America. Am. Nat. 138: 973993.
  • Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection? A selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53: 205214.
  • Zimmer, K.J. & Isler, M.L. 2003. Family Thamnophilidae (typical antbirds). In: Handbook of Birds of the World, Vol. 8 (J.Del Hoyo, A.Elliott & D.Christie, eds), pp. 448681. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.