SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Álvarez-Rebolledo, M. 2000. Cantos de aves de la cordillera oriental de Colombia. Banco de Sonidos Animales (BSA). Instituto de Investigaciones de Recursos Biológicos Alexander van Humboldt. Boyacá, Colombia.
  • Álvarez-Rebolledo, M., Córdoba, S. & López, J.A. 2003. Guía sonora de las aves del Departamento del Valle de Cauca, Colombia. Reserva Forestal de Yo Toco. Serie CAR. Banco de Sonidos Animales (BSA). Instituto de Investigaciones de Recursos Biológicos Alexander van Humboldt. Villa de Leyva, Boyacá, Colombia.
  • Amundsen, T. 2000. Why are female birds ornamented? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 149155.
  • Andersson, M. 1982. Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 17: 375393.
  • Andersson, M. 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40: 804816.
  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Badyaev, A.V. & Hill, G.E. 2000. Evolution of sexual dichromatism: contribution of carotenoid-versus melanin-based coloration. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 69: 153172.
  • Badyaev, A.V. & Hill, G.E. 2003. Avian sexual dichromatism in relation to phylogeny and ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 2749.
  • Badyaev, A.V., Hill, G.E. & Weckworth, B.V. 2002. Species divergence in sexually selected traits: increase in song elaboration is related to decrease in plumage ornamentation in finches. Evolution 56: 412419.
  • Birkhead, T.R. & Møller, A.P. 1992. Sperm Competition in Birds: Evolutionary Causes and Consequences. Academic Press, London, UK.
  • Blomberg, S.P., Garland, T. & Ives, A.R. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57: 717745.
  • Brush, A.H. 1978. Avian pigmentation. In: Chemical Zoology. Vol. 10. Aves (A.H.Brush, ed.), pp. 141164. Academic Press, New York.
  • Catchpole, C.K. & Slater, P.J.B. 1995. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Charif, R.A., Mitchell, S. & Clark, C.W. 1995. Canary 1.2.1 User’s Manual. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.
  • Coffey, B.B. & Coffey, L.C. 1990. Songs of Mexican Birds. Ara records, Gainesville, FL.
  • Coffey, B.B. & Coffey, L.C. 1993. Bird Songs and Calls from Southeast Peru. Ara Records, Gainesville, FL.
  • Collar, N.J. 2001. Family Trogonidae (Trogons). In: Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 6. Mousebirds to Hornbills (J.Del Hoyo, A.Elliott & J.Sargatal, eds), pp. 80129. Lynx Editions, Barcelona, Spain.
  • DaCosta, J.F. & Klicka, J. 2008. The Great American Interchange in birds: a phylogenetic perspective with the genus Trogon. Mol. Ecol. 17: 13281343.
  • Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London.
  • Dunn, P.O., Whittingham, L.A. & Pitcher, T.E. 2001. Mating system, sperm competition, and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution 55: 161175.
  • Endler, J.A. & Théry, M. 1996. Interacting effects of lek placement, display behavior, ambient light, and color patterns in three neotropical forest-dwelling birds. Am. Nat. 148: 421452.
  • Endler, J.A., Wescott, D.A., Madden, J.A. & Robson, T. 2005. Animal visual systems and the evolution of color patterns: sensory processing illuminates signal evolution. Evolution 59: 17951818.
  • Espinosa de los Monteros, A. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships among the trogons. Auk 115: 937954.
  • Espinosa de los Monteros, A. 2000. Higher-level phylogeny of Trogoniformes. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 14: 2034.
  • Fain, M.G. & Houde, P. 2004. Parallel radiations in the primary clades of birds. Evolution 58: 25582573.
  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 115.
  • Fox, H.M. & Vevers, G. 1960. The Nature of Animal Colors. Macmillan, New York.
  • Garland, T. Jr, Harvey, P.H. & Ives, A.R. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41: 1832.
  • Garland, T., Bennett, A.F. & Rezende, E.L. 2005. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J. Exp. Biol. 208: 30153035.
  • Gil, D. & Gahr, M. 2002. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Evol. Evol. 17: 133141.
  • Goloboff, P.A. 1993. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9: 8391.
  • González, C. & Ornelas, J.F. 2005. Song structure and microgeographic variation song variation in Wedge-tailed Sabrewings (Campylopterus curvipennis) in Veracruz, Mexico. Auk 122: 593607.
  • Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 326: 119157.
  • Grafen, A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 144: 517546.
  • Grandcolas, P., Deleporte, P., Desutter-Grandcolas, L. & Daugeron, C. 2001. Phylogenetics and ecology: as many characters as possible should be included in the cladistic analysis. Cladistics 17: 104110.
  • Gray, D.A. 1996. Carotenoids and sexual dimorphism in North American passerine birds. Am. Nat. 148: 453480.
  • Hardy, J.W. 1983. Voices of Neotropical birds. Ara records, Gainesville, FL.
  • Hardy, J.W., Reynard, G.B. & Coffey, B.B. 1987. Voices of the New World Cuckoos and Trogons. Ara records, Gainesville, FL.
  • Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S. & Von Schantz, T. 1996. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381: 229232.
  • Hill, G.E. 1990. Female house finches prefer colourful males: sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait. Anim. Behav. 40: 563572.
  • Hill, G.E. 1993. Male mate choice and the evolution of female plumage coloration in the house finch. Evolution 47: 15151525.
  • Hill, G.E. 2000. Energetic constraints on expression of carotenoid-based plumage coloration. J. Avian Biol. 31: 559566.
  • Hill, G.E., Doucet, S.M. & Buchholtz, R. 2005. The effect of coccidial infection on iridescent plumage coloration in wild turkeys. Anim. Behav. 69: 387394.
  • Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754755.
  • Huelsenbeck, J.P., Larget, B., Miller, R.E. & Ronquist, F. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51: 673688.
  • Iwasa, Y. & Pomianowski, A. 1994. The evolution of mate preferences for multiple sexual ornaments. Evolution 48: 853867.
  • Jawor, J.M. & Breitwisch, R. 2003. Melanin ornaments, honesty, and sexual selection. Auk 120: 249265.
  • Johansson, U.S. 1998. The early evolution of the Trogonidae. Ostrich 69: 402.
  • Johansson, U.S. & Ericson, P.G.P. 2003. Molecular support for a sister group relationship between Pici and Galbulae (Piciformes sensu Wetmore 1960). J. Avian Biol. 34: 185187.
  • Johansson, U.S. & Ericson, P.G.P. 2005. A re-evaluation of basal phylogenetic relationships within trogons (Aves: Trogonidae) based on nuclear DNA sequences. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 43: 166173.
  • Johnsgard, P.A. 2000. Trogons and Quetzals of the World. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  • Keller, G.A. 2001. Bird Songs of Southeastern Arizona and Sonora, Mexico. Macaulay Library of Natural Sounds, Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.
  • Kodric-Brown, A. & Brown, J.H. 1984. Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am. Nat. 124: 309323.
  • Lessels, C.M. & Boag, P.T. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104: 116121.
  • Maddison, D.R. & Maddison, W.P. 2004. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 1.01 [on line]. Available at: http://mesquiteproject.org.
  • Martins, E.P. & Garland, T. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45: 534557.
  • McGraw, K.J. 2003. Melanins, metals, and mate quality. Oikos 102: 402406.
  • McGraw, K.J. & Hill, G.E. 2000. Differential effects of endoparasitism on the expression of carotenoid- and melanin-based ornamental coloration. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 15251530.
  • McGraw, K.J., Mackillop, E.A., Dale, J. & Hauber, M.E. 2002. Different colors reveal different information: how nutritional stress affects the expression of melanin and structurally based ornamental plumage. J. Exp. Biol. 205: 37473755.
  • McNaught, M.K. & Owens, I.P.F. 2002. Interspecific variation in plumage colour among birds: species recognition or light environment? J. Evol. Biol. 15: 505514.
  • Midford, P.E., Garland, T. Jr & Maddison, W.P. 2002 pdap: pdtree Package for Mesquite, Version 1.01.1. URL http://mesquiteproject.org/mesquite/pdap.
  • Møller, A.P. & Birkhead, T.R. 1994. The evolution of plumage brightness in birds is related to extrapair paternity. Evolution 48: 10891100.
  • Moyle, R.G. 2005. Phylogeny and biogeographical history of Trogoniformes, a pantropical bird order. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84: 725738.
  • Nixon, K.C. 1999. The Parsimony Ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15: 407414.
  • Nowicki, S., Peters, S. & Podos, J. 1998. Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Am. Zool. 38: 179190.
  • Nowicki, S., Searcy, W.A. & Peters, S. 2002. Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the “nutritional stress hypothesis.” J. Comp. Physiol. A. 188: 10031014.
  • Olson, V.A. & Owens, I.P.F. 1998. Costly sexual signals: are carotenoids rare, risky or required? Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 510514.
  • Ornelas, J.F., González, C. & Uribe, J. 2002. Complex vocalizations and aerial displays of the Amethyst-throated Hummingbird (Lampornis amethystinus). Auk 119: 11411149.
  • Owens, I.P.F. & Bennett, P.M. 1994. Mortality costs of parental care and sexual dimorphism in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257: 18.
  • Owens, I.P.F. & Hartley, I.R. 1998. Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are there so many different forms of dimorphism? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 397407.
  • Podos, J., Huber, S.K. & Taft, B. 2004. Bird song: the interface of evolution and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 35: 5587.
  • Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817818.
  • Price, T.D. 1984. Sexual selection on body size, plumage and territory variables in a population of Darwin’s finches. Evolution 38: 327341.
  • Price, J.J. & Lanyon, S.M. 2002. Reconstructing the evolution of complex bird song in the oropendolas. Evolution 56: 15141529.
  • Price, J.J. & Lanyon, S.M. 2004. Patterns of song evolution and sexual selection in the oropendolas and caciques. Behav. Ecol. 15: 485497.
  • Purvis, A., Glitteman, J.L. & Luh, H.K. 1994. Truth or consequences: effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. J. Theor. Biol. 167: 293300.
  • De Queiroz, K. 1996. Including the characters of interest during tree reconstruction and the problems of circularity and bias in studies of character evolution. Am. Nat. 148: 700708.
  • Read, A.F. & Harvey, P.H. 1989. Reassessment of comparative evidence for Hamilton and Zuk theory on the evolution of secondary sexual characters. Nature 339: 618620.
  • Read, A.F. & Weary, D.M. 1992. The evolution of bird song: comparative analyses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B, Biol. Sci. 338: 165187.
  • De Repentigny, Y., Ouellet, H. & McNeil, R. 2000. Song versus plumage in some North American oscines: testing Darwin’s hypothesis. EcoScience 7: 137148.
  • Roff, D.A. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2007. The evolution of trade-offs: where are we? J. Evol. Biol. 20: 433447.
  • Ross, D.L., Rabenold, K.N. & Simons, T.R. 1997. Indicator Birds of the Costa Rican Cloud Forest. Library of Natural Sounds, Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.
  • Schluter, D. & Price, T. 1993. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 253: 117122.
  • Searcy, W.A. 1992. Song repertoire and mate choice in birds. Am. Zool. 32: 7180.
  • Seddon, N. 2005. Ecological adaptation and species recognition drives vocal evolution in Neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution 59: 200215.
  • Shutler, D. & Weatherhead, P.J. 1990. Targets of sexual selection: song and plumage of wood warblers. Evolution 44: 19671977.
  • Sibley, C.G. & Monroe, B.L. 1990. Distribution and Classification of the Birds of the World. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
  • Siefferman, L. & Hill, G.E. 2005. Evidence for sexual selection on structural plumage coloration in female Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis). Evolution 59: 18191828.
  • Sikes, D.S. & Lewis, P.O. 2001. Beta Software, Version 1. paupRat: paup* Implementation of the Parsimony Ratchet. Distributed by the authors, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
  • Sorenson, M.D., Oneal, E., García Moreno, J. & Mindell, D.P. 2003. More taxa, more characters: the hoatzin problem is still unresolved. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 14841498.
  • SPSS, Inc. 2002. SPSS 11.0.2 for Mac OSX. SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL.
  • Stephens, P.R. & Wiens, J.J. 2008. Testing for evolutionary trade-offs in a phylogenetic context: ecological diversification and evolution of locomotor performance in emydid turtles. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 7787.
  • Swofford, D.L. 2002. paup*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other Methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Walther, B.A. & Clayton, D.H. 2004. Elaborate ornaments are costly to maintain: evidence for high maintenance handicaps. Behav. Ecol. 16: 8995.
  • Wasserman, F.E. & Cigliano, J.A. 1991. Song output and stimulation of the female in white-throated sparrows. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 5559.
  • Wiens, J.J. 1998. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy? Syst. Biol. 47: 625640.
  • Wiens, J.J. 2003. Missing data, incomplete taxa and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52: 528538.
  • Wiens, J.J., Fetzner, J.W., Parkinson, C.L. & Reeder, T.W. 2005. Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades. Syst. Biol. 54: 719748.
  • Zrzavy, J. 1997. Phylogenetics and ecology: all characters should be included in the cladistic analysis. Oikos 80: 186192.